Slashdot Mirror


The History of the CD-ROM

Gammu writes "The inventor of the compact disc, the most popular medium in the world for playing back and storing music, is often disputed as one individual did not invent every part of the compact disc. The most attributed inventor is James Russell, who in 1965 was inspired with a revolutionary idea as he sketched on paper a more ideal music recording system to replace vinyl records; Russell envisioned a system which could record and replay sounds without any physical contact between parts."

13 of 299 comments (clear)

  1. Original CD Players by GizmoToy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I remember my father bought one of the original Sony audio CD players. It was a CDP-102, the second version released in 1984. It looked quite a bit like the one in the article, but it was shorter and longer... the typical stereo component profile. That thing weighs a ton, and when you inserted the CD it had a clear window so you could watch the tray lower itself and the CD onto the motor. I thought that was the coolest thing.

    Built like a tank, too. It was still in regular use until just recently, and still worked flawlessly without so much as a cleaning over 20 years later. They don't make them like that, anymore. Maybe it was better components, or simply nostalgia, but I thought it had a better sound quality that most CD players these days.

    1. Re:Original CD Players by PenguSven · · Score: 4, Funny

      how was it both shorter AND longer at the same time?

      --
      What is...?
  2. Sony CDP-101 by Trogre · · Score: 4, Funny

    Bah, this must be just another proprietary Sony format that will never catch on, like the 3.5" floppy disk. When will they ever learn?

    --
    "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
  3. An interesting guy... by yroJJory · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I had the honor of meeting Mr. Russell in NYC during the Audio Engineering Society's conference in 2003. He was an interesting person to speak with and was very understated. He sat next to my fiancee on the shuttle bus returning from the conference to Times Square and it was only after chatting with him for 10 minutes or so that he revealed (after much prodding) that he was at the conference as part of the AES Historical section and that he felt like it was a waste of effort to be present. He said that nobody was interested in meeting him.

    At that, my fiancee turned to me and my other friends, sitting behind them, and introduced us.

    We chatted for the remainder of the bus ride and he told us a little of what the invention process was like and how he hadn't even made a dime from something that we noted had changed the world. (He wasn't bitter, BTW.)

    I got his autograph (as did several others) and a short line formed. I still have the CD I had him sign.

    It's nice to see him getting some recognition.

    --
    Jory
  4. Re:CD isn't obsolete by fractoid · · Score: 4, Funny

    No, what killed DVD-Audio was some top-brass exec being asked by his 12-year-old daughter why the kids at school were laughing at her. Apparently they'd found out her daddy "made DVDA albums".

    --
    Rampant carbon sequestration destroyed the Dinosaurs' tropical paradise. I'm here to help repair the damage.
  5. Bill Gates advocated CD-ROM very early by ynotds · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Bill was in Sydney on the day he became a billionaire* and was surprised to find a bunch of locals wanting to hear more of his recently published thoughts on the then still prospective new medium, but was happy enough to participate in a breakfast discussion quickly arranged by his then Australian representative Linda Graham.

    CD-ROM was arguably his last time Bill was close enough to the leading edge that others who made a living at that edge sought his opinion.

    *M$ had listed overnight Australian time.

    --
    -- Our systemic servants do not good masters make.
  6. Re:Now if we could only go back in time... by AKAImBatman · · Score: 4, Insightful

    go back in time and give him the designs for the bluRay.

    It wouldn't help anything. Today's optical discs are based on the continual refinement of manufacturing processes. You could go back in time and explain how to make a BluRay disc and player, but no one would be able to manufacture discs with tight enough tolerances or microchips of sufficient speed and power to play back the data stream. And that's leaving out the issue of finding an HDTV set to make full use of the format. (HDTV was invented in 1969, but wasn't commercially viable until the 90's.)

    Most people don't think about it, but inventions are driven as much by infrastructure as they are by smart people. If you lack the necessary industrial base, having all the technical knowledge in the world won't help you. (Witness a lot of third-world countries. The knowledge for a lot of technology is available, but they can't manufacture it.) To close the gap you still need to build tools which you refine and/or use to build better tools which you refine and/or use to build better tools, so on and so forth.
  7. Missing items by MavEtJu · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Honestly, the Wikipedia article gives a better background and has more information about related technologies (laserdisc for example).

    Also, the famous Why has the compact disc 74 minutes of playtime is explained there:

    According to a Sunday Tribune interview [1] the story is slightly more involved. At that time (1979) Philips owned Polygram, one of the world's largest distributors of music. Polygram had set up a large experimental CD plant in Hanover, Germany, which could produce huge amounts of CDs having, of course, a diameter of 115 mm. Sony did not yet have such a facility. If Sony had agreed on the 115 mm disc, Philips would have had a significant competitive edge in the market. Sony was aware of that, did not like it, and something had to be done. The long-playing time of Beethoven's Ninth imposed by Ohga was used to push Philips to accept 120 mm, so that Philips' Polygram lost its edge on disc fabrication.
    --
    bash$ :(){ :|:&};:
  8. Size Change by Kenshin · · Score: 5, Funny

    FTFA: Many other decisions were made that year, such as the disc diameter (115m)...
    The disc diameter was changed from 115m to 120mm to allow for 74 minutes of playback with the sampling rate and quality chosen.


    Thank god. I'd hate to imagine the storage rack I'd need to keep those 115m discs.

    --

    Does it make you happy you're so strange?

  9. Re:Inventor by AKAImBatman · · Score: 4, Informative

    Russell may have conceived of a technology, but Gregg was the first to actually implement a working means to digitally handle audio and music on a disc for mass consumption.

    Just to pick at a nit here, Gregg's work was an analog recording, not digital. If you look at the direct derivitive of Gregg's work - the LaserDisc - you'll find that the data is encoded in a Pulse Width Modulation format. This allowed for NTSC signals to be directly recorded to discs long before the invention of digital encoding technologies like MPEG.

    In fact, the microprocessor technology necessary to decode a digital datastream into television quality video cost millions of dollars back when the LaserDisc was introduced to the market. During development of the format, the necessary framebuffer devices were still in development and wouldn't reach truecolor capabilties until the New York Institute of Technology experiment in 1977. (They took three 8-bit, grayscale framebuffers manufactured by Evans & Sutherland and wired them together to create a 24-bit display.)

    So as you can imagine, an analog design was far superior to a digital video format back when Laserdiscs were introduced. :-)
  10. A Dutchman improved the production process by cheros · · Score: 4, Informative

    If I recall correctly it was Ron Kok, a Dutch entrepreneur, who came up with a *MUCH* more efficient production method to make them cheaper. He put the separate components inline and improved the sequence, thus taking away a lot of the media handling which caused quality issues. Quality went up, volume went up, price came down.

    Did the guy get rich off it? No, because in those days he was naive and thus had it stolen and copied from right underneath his nose. He's fared better since, but he's the guy that's responsible for CDs being so dirt cheap (AFAIK, been a while since I heard this).

    --
    Insert .sig here. Send no money now. Owner may sue, contents will settle. Batteries not included.
  11. Re:a ton would be about right. by Hal_Porter · · Score: 4, Funny

    He's probably a audiophile. A single bit error in their music causes them to haywire and then explode. This is the same effect applied to text.

    --
    echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
  12. The diameter was reduced from the original design by Poingggg · · Score: 4, Funny

    From TFA: The disc diameter was changed from 115m to 120mm to allow for 74 minutes of playback...

    Maybe they thought it might be hard to get consumers to put a 115 meter playback device in their room. And of course they would get complaints from record stores who should have to get bigger doors to get the disks through, not to mention storage space.

    --
    What person will donate an airborne act of love?