Slashdot Mirror


Take Two Vows To Publish Manhunt 2

Despite Manhunt 2's bad reception in both UK and US, Take Two has publicly announced that it will publish the game at some point. Backing the title as art, once again, the company vowed to see the game released in some capacity or another. "The chairman added that Take-Two subsidiary Rockstar Games, which publishes Manhunt and the Grand Theft Auto series, sees itself as a producer of games rated M for Mature. However, Zelman did say Take-Two would stand by its game, even if it bore the dreaded AO for Adults Only rating. 'We don't see ourselves in the Adults Only business,' he told analysts listening to the call. 'Having said that, if we find ourselves in the Adults Only business, it would be because we have a title that we consider art and entertainment, that we consider if appropriately labeled AO, and that we would like to bring to market.'"

8 of 116 comments (clear)

  1. In some capacity or another. by Digital+Vomit · · Score: 4, Funny

    In some capacity or another, eh? Come on collectible card game!

    --
    Modern copyright is theft of culture from everyone and it retards the progress of the useful arts and sciences.
  2. Uh, How Will This Work? by blueZhift · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It's nice that they're determined to get the game out, but how is this going to happen if the Sony and Nintendo won't approve the game for their consoles? And I don't recall there being a PC version of the game. Of course they could port it to the PC and then just sell it online, maybe even with Steam. But unless they were planning this contingency all along, it will take time to port the game. Another question is whether Microsoft would allow the game on the 360. If they have to take the time to do a PC port, then a 360 port almost comes for free. Manhunt 2 as an Xbox 360/Windows Vista exclusive might actually make sense. Not only that, if they're successful, it could put a whole new spin on the AO rating issue. It might just remove the curse.

  3. Re:Good for them by Volante3192 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    AO is more like the NC-17 rating. ESRB's M is equivalent, in theory, to MPAA's R even though they're not enforced the same.

    I'd like to see whoever it was that ran a sting operation and saw 69% of kids under 17 could buy M rated games do the same for R rated films like Hostel, Saving Private Ryan and Pulp Fiction. (Yes, I picked those films on purpose as examples)

  4. Stop the presses! by Control+Group · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Take 2 vows to try and eke some income out of a product they've already spent money on!

    --

    Reality has a conservative bias: it conserves mass, energy, momentum...
  5. Could be the best thing by ihatewinXP · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Think of it....

      I think I speak for a lot of people that would _love_ to see the AO rating go from "the dreaded" to the "hells yeah!" rating. I mean we all want these kinds of titles - we are growing up but dammit as much as I love nintendo I want my games to grow up with me. Honestly I cant figure out where the real problem is. Distributors refuse to carry it - why? I know the fact that Wal-Mart wont carry it is a real problem when you are looking at your bottom line - but thankfully they looked at a bottom line of zero and are deciding to go ahead.

    What I could see this as doing for the future is this being remembered as that first title that said 'the hell with it' and went through with the AO rating and made the Nintendo/Sony/Microsoft's realize that there is a market here and it is worth expanding our definition of games. Take Two is an utter mess at this point - but that desperation is great for doing something crazy that just might work. Dont tone down the game - throw in those few bits you were scared would originally garner an AO rating and just sell the damn thing.

    --
    ---- The real Slashdot is still here. You just have to browse at -1 to read the comments.
    1. Re:Could be the best thing by BMonger · · Score: 4, Insightful

      As I grow up I didn't stop saving the princess and start killing people in brutal ways. Just because my age changes doesn't mean I want more violence in my life.

      I'm not saying they shouldn't publish the game at all... Publish away, I don't have to buy it. I just don't think the majority of adults even really care about AO games.

    2. Re:Could be the best thing by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Nintendo/Microsoft/Sony should be able to bar whatever they want Would you extend Microsoft's right to being able to prevent playing AO games on XP or Vista?

      What if all the major record labels decided they would no longer publish songs with profanity in them? Or even CD players refused to play certain CDs based on their content?

      How about the DVDCCA deciding to amend their license to require DVD players to refuse to play anything above R?

      Yeah, I disagree that the makers of a game console can restrict what types of games I can play based on their content. That console is in the privacy of my own home; I should get to decide what gets played on it. Once I buy it, it isn't their console anymore; it's mine! If they want control, they should lease the console, not sell it.
      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
  6. Re:I'm sure there is a market. by plague3106 · · Score: 3, Informative

    The ESRB was created out of an act of Congress.

    No, it was created in response to a threat of an act of Congress, by the industry itself.