Tech Writers Spreading FUD About GPLv3
Tookis writes "Tech writers are spreading FUD about GPLv3 because they fear its take up will slow the adoption of Linux, according to this open source writer. "A large number of tech writers — I wouldn't call them journalists and sully my own profession — are fearful that the license will slow adoption of Linux in the workplace. And that would lead to a lessening of their own importance and influence."" So by posting this, am I spreading fud about spreading fud? I think I broke my brain.
Journalism is well beyond being unsullied these days.
"It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education." -Albert Einstein
Remember, if you are not for GPLv3 then you are for the terrorists, or something...
Not trolling here, just being half serious/half funny--
"...they fear its take up will slow the adoption of Linux..."
I started going to LUG meetings over nine years ago. As much I love Linux, I don't think its rate of adoption could go much slower than it already is.
Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
Nah, it's a different flavor. This one has peanuts in it!
(I should've resisted the urge to post this, but for some reason I find compelled to foist this unpleasant analogy onto Slashdot.)
Ben Hocking
Need a professional organizer?