Slashdot Mirror


Adobe Flash Exploit Could Log Keystrokes

Kenyon Lessi writes "Adobe has issued three critical security updates, one of which is designed to stop a problem in the way the Flash player interacts with browsers, which could result in users' keystrokes being transmitted to attackers. The problem affect Adobe Flash Player version 9.0.45.0, 8.0.34.0 and 7.0.69.0, as well as their earlier versions running on all platforms."

11 of 156 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Great... by GizmoToy · · Score: 1, Insightful

    You'd think that it would have occurred to them that they were putting a Flash ad on a page discussing a major flaw in Flash. Of course, they just want to get paid and don't really care about you, so I can't say I'm all that surprised.

  2. Re:Always So Negative by monk.e.boy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    they should Open Source the player. That would solve most of their problems.

    The only bit that is worth anything is the Flash IDE designer thingy.

    If it was opensource it'd be a great stop gap between HTML + JS (now) and HTML + SVG + JS (future). It'd also help fight Silverlight, which is gunna take over the world if we aren't careful :-(

    Any other ideas for spreading multi-media web without using Java (ugh) Flash (ugh) or Silverlight (hm...)?

    monk.e.boy

  3. Re:If exploited on a ... by AKAImBatman · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I believe the buttons on the Wiimote map to a few keys (for use in Flash games)

    Actually, the keypresses only make it as far as Javascript. In order to "hear" the presses in Flash, you need to use the WiiCade API, which traps all the keypresses and forwards them to Flash. There's also the earlier Quasimondo API, but it fails to trap the keypresses, making it useless under most circumstances.
  4. Re:Great... by Cutriss · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You'd think that it would have occurred to them that they were putting a Flash ad on a page discussing a major flaw in Flash. Of course, they just want to get paid and don't really care about you, so I can't say I'm all that surprised.
    Or...maybe the world isn't as evil of a place as you think, and the people writing the article aren't the same people that develop the website? Maybe they don't even know how to use Flash and just write copy?
    --
    "Mod, mod, mod...and another troll bites the dust."
  5. Re:Monopoly by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Even though my primary computer has Linux installed I find myself hoping that the new Windows Silverlight will give Flash a lot of healthy competition.

    You're hoping that Flash will be displaced by Silverlight, a Microsoft offering? Seriously?

    Say what you want about Adobe but at least Flash is available for more than Windows and OSX, which are the only two OSes that Silverlight will be available on.

    Not only do Adobe produce Linux players, they also produce a Solaris player. Good luck trying to get either of those out of Microsoft this side of armageddon.

    Oh, and I do appreciate that some people consider Flash to be an evil tool but at least you have the choice whether or not to install it. You just know that with Silverlight, as with MSIE, installation will be compulsory somewhere down the line, via a critical update or service pack.

    Trust me, if you're worried about monopolies then the last company that you want involved in building a Flash killer is Microsoft.

    --

    "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
  6. Is the ActiveX affected? by smooth+wombat · · Score: 2, Insightful

    We don't allow people to install Flash on their systems here at work but we do provide the ActiveX component to run Flash. Is it affected as well? The article doesn't say.

    Personally, I don't run Flash. Time and again it has been shown to be a security risk and these new developments only strengthen that perception.

    --
    We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
    1. Re:Is the ActiveX affected? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Personally, I don't run Flash. Time and again it has been shown to be a security risk

      And ActiveX isn't?!

  7. Re:Quality by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So well written that they couldn't port it to 64bit platforms without rewriting the underlying script host from the ground up.

    Portability (which has multiple dimensions) is not a measure of quality, it is a design goal that may or may not be part of the goals of a project.

    --
    Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
  8. Re:Monopoly by TheRaven64 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Look at IE between killing off NetScape and FireFox becoming popular. Now compare that to IE when it had competition from NetScape and later FireFox. I don't want SilverLight to win, but I'd much rather Flash had some competition, because competition helps encourage innovation.

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  9. Misleading headline by mad.frog · · Score: 2, Insightful

    More accurate would be "Adobe Issues Fixes For Flash Exploit That Could Log Keystrokes"...

    Headline implies that exploits were just found and still exist. Not so.

  10. Re:Quality by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You sir, are not a programmer. End of story.

    --
    "But this one goes to 11!"