Slashdot Mirror


Police Given Access to Congestion-Charge Cameras

The BBC is reporting that anti-terror Police officers in London have been given live access to the "congestion charge cameras", allowing them to view and track vehicles in real time. This is a change from the original procedure that required them to apply for access on a case-by-case basis. "Under the new rules, anti-terror officers will be able to view pictures in "real time" from Transport for London's (Tfl) 1,500 cameras, which use Automatic Number Plate Recognition (ANPR) technology to link cars with owners' details. But they will only be able to use the data for national security purposes and not to fight ordinary crime, the Home Office stressed."

10 of 293 comments (clear)

  1. Can you taste that? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Mmm, frog stew.

  2. The best part. by Radon360 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    only be able to use the data for national security purposes and not to fight ordinary crime, the Home Office stressed

    Yeah, for now.

    1. Re:The best part. by Nightwraith · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yep. And they weren't to be used for National Security purposes when installed.

      This is why you don't give a mouse a cookie...

    2. Re:The best part. by cuantar · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yeah, just like the American government only uses the Patriot Act for national security purposes and not to fight ordinary crime, like drug dealers and street gangs... *cough*

      --
      Legalize it.
  3. you mean, "on the record," right? by tiedyejeremy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "The BBC is reporting that anti-terror Police officers in London have been given live access to the "congestion charge cameras", allowing them to view and track vehicles in real time. "

    If the anti-terror Police officers in London are anything like the anti-terror officers in the States, I would suspect that public acknowledgment means it's been going on for a decade, minimum.

    --
    Anything you say will be held against you. ... "tits"
  4. New Rules? by keithmo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "Under the new rules... will only be able to use the data for national security purposes and not to fight ordinary crime..."

    Until, of course, they change the rules again.

  5. Beauuutiful example by MobyDisk · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is a perfect example of how the government creates a system that COULD be abused but has a legitimate purpose initially. The people allow it, so long as it is not used for evil. Then, once the government has it in place, the rules are changed. I'll have to remember this one next time somebody gives the argument that we don't have to worry about the some new PATRIOT-style act.

  6. Yeah, that'll last. by smellsofbikes · · Score: 4, Insightful

    >But they will only be able to use the data for national security purposes and not to fight ordinary crime, the Home Office stressed.

    I wonder how long that'll last... which is to say, I wonder for how long they've already been using the data to at least track ordinary crime, just waiting for the general public to give up caring enough that they can use the reams of data they've collected with impunity. Or whether we, over here in the USA, will even find out that this kind of technology exists and is being used.

    Anything the government can use against its citizens, it probably already is, and if not, it's only because of technical limitations they're busily trying to fix.

    --
    Nostalgia's not what it used to be.
  7. Re:Hm by Volante3192 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    And then what? Assult? Property damage? Jaywalking? Littering? Unregistered gatherings...that simply turns out to be three people waiting for the lorry?

    It always seems reasonable until it becomes too late to change it.

  8. Jean Charles de Menezes by tsbiscaro · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The offices can't even tell the difference between 2 photos. Jean was murdered by London officers after they mislead him with a Muslim terrorist that lived at the same building. An officer took a picture of Jean, sent to the police headquarters, and they said: "that's it, he's our man". http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jean_Charles_de_Menez es