Slashdot Mirror


Which Google Should Congress Believe?

theodp writes "In Congressional testimony last month, Google's VP of People Operations told the House Judiciary Subcommittee on Immigration that, due to limits on the number of H-1B visas, Google is regularly unable to pursue highly qualified candidates. But as Google stock tumbled in after hours trading Wednesday, Google's CEO blamed disappointing profits on a hiring binge and promised Wall Street analysts that the company would keep a careful eye on headcount in the future. So which Google should Congress believe?"

9 of 428 comments (clear)

  1. Outsourcing? by Renaissance+2K · · Score: 4, Funny

    I didn't realize IT companies weren't allowed to hire American workers.

  2. Re:Qualifications by moderatorrater · · Score: 5, Funny

    Actually, by "qualifications" they mean "people who have Ph.D.s"; they're similar to what you were saying, I know, but the difference is there.

  3. Looks like by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 3, Funny

    Google spent oodles of boodle hiring the entire kit and caboodle while the managers went feudal.

    If they think congress will buy both stories, they lost their noodles!

    --
    She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
  4. I know! by Etrias · · Score: 2, Funny

    The first one. Wait! No, that second guy. I don't know! Third base!

  5. Re:The two are not mutually exclusive by eln · · Score: 5, Funny

    Sure, but then you have all of the additional overhead costs associated with maintaining 9 babies instead of just one.

  6. Re:The two are not mutually exclusive by PCM2 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Not if they're foreign babies! Clearly, the high cost of American babies is the problem here, not procreation in general.

    --
    Breakfast served all day!
  7. Re:The two are not mutually exclusive by PCM2 · · Score: 5, Funny

    So what are you saying? I need to have sex with 9 women this month in order to optimize overall baby production?

    Not exactly. The Mythical Man Month teaches us that when you're having woman problems, throwing more women at the problem is never the solution.

    The formula is n(n-1)/2 ... that is, for each group of women n, the number of channels of communication in the group is equal to n times n-1 (where the 1 is you), divided by two.

    Because of this, Fred Brooks recommends that you not engage any baby-producers until the overall system of women is well architected. Note that this process can take an incredibly long time. Another solution is to employ women with off-the-shelf babies, which often come with a third-party support contract.

    --
    Breakfast served all day!
  8. Re:The two are not mutually exclusive by Bobby+Mahoney · · Score: 3, Funny

    Or perhaps... It's the Microsoft-hive-brain itself writing the article!

    --
    !#&*
  9. Believe Both by PPH · · Score: 4, Funny

    Google was unable to hire sufficient numbers of qualified (i.e. third world minimum wage) programmers. As a result, they were forced to employ overpaid local talent who spent most of their day posting snotty remarks on /.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.