Slashdot Mirror


Huge Martian Dust Storm Threatens Rovers

Riding with Robots writes "NASA reports that a severe ongoing dust storm on the Red Planet has blocked 99 percent of the direct sunlight that powers the Opportunity rover. If these conditions persist for too long, it could finally bring an end to the marathon mission of this robot geologist, and perhaps of its partner Spirit as well. 'Before the dust storms began blocking sunlight last month, Opportunity's solar panels had been producing about 700 watt hours of electricity per day, enough to light a 100-watt bulb for seven hours. When dust in the air reduced the panels' daily output to less than 400 watt hours, the rover team suspended driving and most observations, including use of the robotic arm, cameras and spectrometers to study the site where Opportunity is located ... A possible outcome of this storm is that one or both rovers could be damaged permanently or even disabled. Engineers will assess the capability of each rover after the storm clears.'"

16 of 164 comments (clear)

  1. Oh no, we're ruined! by eln · · Score: 3, Funny

    Has anyone checked on the Buggalo? This could be another kidnap attempt by the native Martians.

  2. Dust Devils by MathFox · · Score: 3, Funny

    When the storm has settled the dust devils will come to clean the rovers... no worry!

    --
    extern warranty;
    main()
    {
    (void)warranty;
    }
    1. Re:Dust Devils by Rakishi · · Score: 3, Informative

      The problem is that without power the heaters don't run, without heaters the components get too cold and stop working permanently..

    2. Re:Dust Devils by BytePusher · · Score: 3, Informative

      "The worst-case scenario is that enough dust in the sky decreases solar energy to the point that we have to shut down too many things to save power," Lemmon said. "The rovers keep their battery alive by keeping their electronics alive."

      http://www.space.com/news/070705_dusty_rovers.html

      However, the article also mentions the cold breaking solder joints:
      John Callas, project manager for the Mars Exploration Rover (MER) mission at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, Calif., explained that a dead rover battery could allow cold temperature to maim Opportunity's electronics.

      "It's like leaving your laptop out in an Antarctic winter," Callas said. "Soldered joints in the electronics can contract due to thermal contraction. If a rover gets too cold, something essential will fail." Callas explained the situation is unprecedented, so the team isn't certain how much more light-blocking dust the rovers-especially Opportunity-can take.

  3. Well, look at the bright side by Anonymous+Crowhead · · Score: 5, Insightful

    These rovers have lasted something like 15 times their original intended/predicted lifespan.

    1. Re:Well, look at the bright side by Commander+Doofus · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yes, that would explain their weird behavior.

      --
      Want to improve your life? This guy will show you how!
  4. Panel Sweepers by rez_rat · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I saw a show on Spirit and Opportunity's trek a few nights back. Pretty amazing couple of machines. I was very impressed. When they brought up the topic of their panels' susceptibility to dust and dust storms, I was wondering why no one had thought to install a couple of panel sweepers or something (like windshield wipers)?

    All in all, these two little guys have done pretty well.

    S-

    1. Re:Panel Sweepers by evanbd · · Score: 4, Informative

      As I understand it, they were pretty sure they could add useful panel wipers -- not perfect, but useful. Or maybe peel-away disposable covers. Or any of several options. The eventual decision was that there were several viable methods, and they all would take the place of about 1 instrument. And the researchers decided they'd rather have another instrument, even if it meant shorter life. As it turns out, they got very lucky and mostly don't need the wipers.

  5. Re:Oy. by Loadmaster · · Score: 3, Funny

    Maybe electric companies convert to a usable measurement like Library of Congress' or width of human hair. I know mine comes as a percent of how many dollars it would take to circle the earth.

    Swi

  6. Re:Turbines by Cervantes · · Score: 4, Informative

    It's too bad these rovers don't have some sort of wind turbines to be utilized for energy. They could have extended an already impressive run. That would be nice, but don't forget Mars has something like 99% less atmosphere than us. So little air pressure that if you jumped out of a plane on Mars and popped a parachute, you'd be the next crater Spirit went to study. I just can't see it being practical, at least on the scale of the rovers.
    --
    If I knew the wedgies I gave you back in 6th grade would have resulted in this . . . I might have taken a moments pause.
  7. Re:WHY was there no brush included? by dastrike · · Score: 4, Informative

    A) The dust is charged (static electricity). Brushing would just shove it around and scratch the solar panels. So some other means of cleaning them would be required, e.g. charging the solar panels so it repels the charged dust?

    B) What good are clean solar panels when the sky is opaque with dust? Needs more nuclear power, which is what the upcoming rover will have.

    --
    while true; do eject; eject -t; done
  8. Re:Do humans really *want* to go to Mars? by WindBourne · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I volunteer. I am willing to bet that you would find more than 10K just in America who would go. This is the ULTIMATE adventure. Hell, if you are worried about dieing, that can happen in ALL sorts of ways here on earth.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  9. Re:Turbines by Surt · · Score: 5, Informative

    You're confusing the possibility that a dust storm can lift enough dust into the atmosphere to block sunlight with the possibility that the wind intensity is sufficiently high to drive a wind turbine. Mars has a very thin atmosphere, and this wind isn't nearly enough to drive a turbine that would produce enough power for the rovers. Lifting dust is a lot easier than pushing the blades of a fan.

    Also, whatever turbine you added would go into the weight of the rover, which then affects the parachute/airbag requirements for landing, and during drive around time you're carrying that extra weight uselessly most of the time.

    This setup:
    http://store.motorwavegroup.com/8-micro-turbines-w ith-generato.html

    generates about twice as much power as the article suggests is needed, on earth (presumably 1atm pressure) at 10m/s wind speed.

    http://www.nap.edu/openbook/0309084261/html/22.htm l
    claims that martian windspeeds peak at 50m/s, but that the dynamic pressure is only 1/9th of that due to the lower atmospheric pressure.
    That gives you an equivalent of only 6m/s equivalent speed (at peak intensity!).

    So ... even at peak windspeed it's going to be hard to generate enough power with turbines that the rover could reasonably carry, and that would all be deadweight for the solar panels during non wind times.

    --
    "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
  10. Re:Turbines by mollymoo · · Score: 3, Informative

    At best, what this teaches us is to include a "wiper" system for at least part of the panels so that we can maintain at least a minimal section of solar panel to generate energy for the essential gear and would give us the ability to keep the rover alive long enough to let the wind that exists on the plant to "clean" the other panels in the time after a storm.

    The problem is that the dust storms are blocking the light before it hits the panels, not just covering the panels with dust. I doubt they'll know how much dust has accumulated on the panels as a result of this storm till it's over.

    --
    Chernobyl 'not a wildlife haven' - BBC News
  11. Its not over till the BBW sings... by PinkyGigglebrain · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Considering their history it would be premature to write them off so soon.

    When the storm ends and the dust settles and no signal is received from Spirit and Opportunity then, and only then, will I raise a glass in memory of those two incredible machines and the end of their mission.


    On a side note has anyone every thought of using Tesla's energy transmitter or other "beamed" energy delivery system (microwave?) to power a planetary probe? Use a big nuke power module, keep it in geostat orbit, or land it with the transmiter, and then drop the rovers down. years of power for the rovers and it could be used by later missions as well.

  12. Re:Do humans really *want* to go to Mars? by R2.0 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Larry Niven tells a story about a NASA panel he was on in the 80's regarding future exploration. It was obvious that the NASA administrator was a bureaucratic hack, and Niven got irritated and started pushing him.

    Niven asked him what the future plans for colonizing the Moon was, and the man replied, incredulously, "Why would anyone want to live on the moon?"

    Niven turned to the assembled reporters and said "Why don't we ask? Let's have a show of hands: How many of you would want to live on the Moon" About 90% of the hands went up, baffling the administrator.

    One reporter said out loud "I'd have to ask my wife". The reporter next to him turned and said "I'd leave my wife."

    --
    "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." A. Carlson