Slashdot Mirror
Next Version of Windows? Call it '7'
CNet has the news that Microsoft is currently aiming to release the next version of the Windows operating system in about three years. Previously known as Vienna, the OS is now simply known internally as '7'. After achieving a quality product, the article states, Microsoft's big goal with 7 is to recapture a regular release schedule for their operating system product. From the article: "Like Vista, Windows 7 will ship in consumer and business versions, and in 32-bit and 64-bit versions. The company also confirmed that it is considering a subscription model to complement Windows, but did not provide specifics or a time frame. Next up on Microsoft's agenda is Service Pack 1 for Windows Vista, which is expected before year's end. The discussion of Windows' future isn't surprising, given that Microsoft has been criticized by business customers for delays related to Vista. Many business customers pay for Microsoft's software under a license agreement called Software Assurance."
the next one = 7
the next one = 7 = VISTA
7 = the next next one = 8
LK
"Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
Looks to me like this is an announcement of a schedule, and not an announcement of a product.
There are no project goals here, and no definitive statements on what it will include or exclude, except the 32/64 bit statement (which seems to be more of a knee-jerk reaction than a firm plan). The subscription method of distribution (which recently was portrayed as "the future"), is mentioned as being possible, but not necessarily included in the plan?
IMO this is all about calming market fears about release schedules. This is about the marketing department asking the software engineers about what two or three "safe bet" features they can announce for the future version of Windows when the engineers probably don't even have pencil sketches on napkins at this point.
Some people may rejoice over Windows stumbling but it's no reason to embrace Linux. Microsoft marketing and geek shilling is just as bad in my book. Windows on every desktop? Never gonna happen. Linux change the world? Never gonna happen. Watching this performance is like watching two queers do a ballet. Sure, it might be like some redneck cop being ass banged by a nigger but, hey, next week it will be the baton stick up Rodney King's ass. Jeez. You guys ought to get married.
Come on guys, this is _good news_. One of the biggest complaints about Vista is that it took so long to get finished, three years for a new OS is perfect. No,it's not going to take SEVEN gigabytes of ram or DX 17 - Vista runs _fine_ on a half-gig, with a geforce FX.
Is Windows the best OS? Defenitly not. Should we resort to hyperbolye and pot-shots? No. Am I the only one who thinks all such commentors are jerks? Apparently.
Whoo, signature!
DesireCampbell.com
have you ever looked at the package list for a distro?
run down the list for the 3 dvds of debian and you will find
1 multiple language versions
2 aps and lots of aps
3 actual documents manuals
count up what you would need for windows to match this and then get back to me
Any person using FTFY or editing my postings agrees to a US$50.00 charge
please mod parent funny if you get the reference.
"When I first heard Daydream Nation it quite frankly scared the living shit out of me." -- Matthew Stearns
Fine, I can see how you can have numerous persistent connections if XP only cuts off in excess of ten concurrent incoming half-open connections.
However, the limit is still a problem for some software (such as P2P systems and possibly some remote management utilities) as I indicated.
And yes, I'm aware that the limit can be modified.
Which doesn't quite make my post "the stupidest and most incorrect thing on Slashdot" - unless of course you haven't read Slashdot in, oh, maybe the last year.
So fuck off, moron. How's that?
Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!