Psychology, Design and Economics of Slot-Machines
6 writes "Technology isn't just about design and hardware; sometimes it's about psychology, politics, sociology, and economics. The website of Stanford design prof Michael Shanks is hosting a student project by William Choi and Antoine Sindhu, a fascinating online course about slot machines. From the site: 'Much research has been devoted to studying gambling behavior from various points of view, including the psychological, social, economic, and political bases and implications of gambling ... [just the same,] focusing on slot machines reveals and inspires the study of many sociological issues that have come to express themselves specifically and notably on these machines. Here, we examine a number of these issues, attempting to link slot machines to them in an effort to better understand and explain them.'"
The authors show a fundamental misunderstanding of what's going on:
Essentially, then, significant government regulation of gambling and casinos means protecting people from themselvesfrom their own innate psychology.
It's amazing how they could come to such a conclusion after detailing so many manipulative and deceptive practices. The lighting, the drinks, the drugged air the arrangement of odds are all lies. Because people do not know they are being lied to, it's hardly fair to say that regulating Casinos is protecting people from themselves.
Taking things from people you are lying to is called fraud. It is a crime and it is indirectly violent because the victim must work and make sacrifices to replace what was stolen. Casinos as they exist in the US are practicing fraud. Outlawing these disgusting institutions is no more paternalistic than banning other forms of theft. It's that simple.
Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.
The lighting and drinks are lies? What does that mean? The drugged air? I've heard of that conspiracy theory, but as far as I know, it's only that -- a conspiracy theory
The article's authors believe otherwise and explain themselves before deciding that regulating fraudulent practices in casinos was some kind of paternalistic, protecting the marks from themselves move. Allow me to quote what they said because you are too lazy to read or to protective to acknowledge the practices.
The mark is kept unaware of the passing of time by artificial lighting.Near misses manipulate the player's sense of odds
Manipulation of payout odd placement Drugging patrons."Free" drinks and ordinary odds are not deceptive like the above is. The mark is unaware of the powerful emotional manipulation at work. This is not a friendly game of cards, it's fraud.
Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.