Slashdot Mirror


What Happens Next on the US Vote on OOXML

Andy Updegrove writes "As you may know, V1, the INCITS Technical Committee that had charge of the US vote on Microsoft's OOXML, failed to reach consensus on either approving or disapproving the specification. As expected, Microsoft has turned to the full INCITS Executive Board in an effort to salvage the situation. Between now and Labor Day, a complicated series of fall-back ballots and meetings has been scheduled to see whether the Executive Board can agree to approve or disapprove OOXML, in either case "with comments." A vote to approve would mean that addressing the comments would not be required for the US vote to stand, while a vote to disapprove would hold the possibility of US approval if the comments are satisfactorily addressed. The bottom line is that a vote to approve (either in the US or in many other nations around the world) does not appear likely, due to the sheer number of technical issues that have been raised with OOXML, and the expedited schedule upon which Microsoft has insisted throughout the process."

2 of 82 comments (clear)

  1. Re:I, for one, am for choice by KlomDark · · Score: 4, Informative

    Wouldn't that be nice?

    Unfortunately, the current OOXML (The Microsoft format) is so messy it's unmaintainable and unimplementable. Major holes, parts with undocumented binary data, etc. It's all a last-ditch attempt for Microsoft to continue it's office monopoly.

    They are being way sneaky with the naming too. Note that the Open Office.org is called ODF (Open Document Format), while Microsoft sneakily called theirs OOXML (Office Open XML) - which confuses everyone, as many people think that OOXML is the "good" format, since they reasonably assume that OOXML means "Open Office XML". But it's not.

    Our best attack right now is to make as many people as we can knowledgable of this name game.

    ODF: Good and Open
    OOXML: Bad and Closed by Microsoft. (It's not truly open when it comes to the details of the format)

  2. Re:No OOXML; Maybe Not ODF by MightyMartian · · Score: 4, Informative

    Save that the specs are ridiculously huge, and full of what really amount to undocumented references. It's not a useful specification.

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.