Slashdot Mirror


UK Rejects Extending Music Copyright

timrichardson writes "The British Government has rejected extending copyright for sound recordings. This is an important development in the face of trends to extend copyright duration, although it leaves British copyright protection for music recordings at a shorter duration than for written works. The decision came despite fierce lobbying from the large British music industry. The music industry will now lobby directly to the European Commission, but without the support of the national government, its position is significantly weakened. British copyright for music recordings therefore remains at 50 years after the date of release of a recording, in contrast to 95 years in the US and 70 years in Australia."

1 of 338 comments (clear)

  1. Ukians? Thinking of voting Conservative? by maroberts · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ...don't until you've got an announcement of a reversal of policy on copyright. I got this reply after expressing my concerns about a speech David Cameron gave to the BPI.

    Dear Mr Roberts,

    I am writing on behalf of David Cameron to thank you for your e-mail
    following David's recent speech to the British Phonographic Industry
    AGM.

    There is little doubt that copyright theft is a major threat to the
    future of our creative industries. Last year alone an estimated 20
    billion music files were downloaded illegally. We must also not forget
    the strong evidence showing that much of the profit from illegal
    downloads and piracy goes to fund drugs and organised crime. Taking
    proper measures to protect our musicians and artists from such theft
    will allow more money to end up with musicians and artists, and will
    allow the music industry to reinvest in developing and nurturing new
    talent.

    That is why David supports the extension of copyright term from the
    current 50 years to 70 years. This would reduce the disparity between
    the length of copyright term given to composers and that granted to
    producers and performers, and will protect the thousands of musicians
    who will lose the rights to their recordings over the next ten years.
    Some people think these are all multi-millionaire rock stars, but the
    reality is that many are low-earning session musicians who will be
    losing a vital pension.

    Finally, we believe that extending copyright term will not only allow
    record companies to further reinvest in developing the next generation
    of musical talent, it will also encourage the industry to digitise both
    older and niche repertoire which will be good for all music fans.

    Thank you, once again, for getting in touch.
    Yours sincerely,

    Honor Fishburn
    Office of David Cameron MP
    House of Commons
    London SW1A 0AA

    My original message was:

    David Cameron is not winning friends and influencing people by the
    speech to the BPI. The recording industry is small, and overly vocal,
    while there are a vast number of people who expect that copyright should
    protect the immediate future of artists, but should not drag on to the
    obscene level of 50 or 70 years after the death of the artist or
    publication. Many people wonder what is so special about music when
    designs and patents only extend for 20 years or so. Like patents,
    copyright should be a deal; protection for a limited term in exchange
    for placing ideas into the public pool.

    Copyright and Patents are designed to encourage people to place their
    ideas into the open so that other people may use them immediately at a
    cost, and so that the ideas therein may become part of the Public body
    of knowledge, available to all for the good of all.

    Far from campaigning for an increase in the length of copyright, its
    duration should be reduced to that similar to patents.

    This argument has been dragging on for ages. He should really read a
    speech by Thomas McCauley on Copyright from 1841, the opinions therein
    are still just as valid today.

    The byline on this form states
    "Conservatives are tackling the issues that matter to the mainstream
    majority."; in making this speech Mr Cameron is pandering to an
    overprivileged minority. Their ideas and products deserve protection for
    a limited term, not fossilisation for ever.

    --

    Donte Alistair Anderson Roberts - hi son!
    Karma: Chameleon