Slashdot Mirror


Intel Researchers Demonstrate 40Gbps Optical Chips

scott3778 writes "Intel Researchers announced they have successfully demonstrated a 40Gbps optical chip, an accomplishment the company says will yield cheaper photonic integrated circuits. 'chip makers have shown a keen interest in photonic integrated circuits (PICs) over the past few years because of their ability to provide a cost-effective solution for optical communication and future optical interconnects in computing industry. There are obstacles, though: One of the key components needed for silicon PICs is the very high-speed silicon optical modulator, which is used to encode data on optical beam.'"

14 of 49 comments (clear)

  1. Silicon! by the_kanzure · · Score: 4, Informative

    There are obstacles, though: One of the key components needed for silicon PICs is the very high-speed silicon optical modulator, which is used to encode data on optical beam.
    * Historical overview of silicon crystal pulling [pdf]
    * Sam's Laser FAQ

    Catalyzing development. (hopefully) :)
    - Does anybody have links or papers re: manufacturing of fiber optics or very small optical beams? Would be great to have.
  2. They need to give one of these for this lady... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Now that's something Sigbritt Löthberg (http://slashdot.org/articles/07/07/12/1236231.sht ml) needs to install on her computer to take advantage of her 40GBps internet link!

    1. Re:They need to give one of these for this lady... by Token_Internet_Girl · · Score: 3, Funny

      Sigbritt Löthberg was the envy of all the retirement home, as she consistently utilized the world's fastest internet connection to outbid everyone on Ebay.

      --
      Sure baby, I'll give you my phone number...in Hex
  3. Re:PICs? by dextromulous · · Score: 2, Funny

    PICs? Hasn't this acronym been used before?
    Sure, it has been used a few times. there are only so many TLAs, you know. Much less than there are IPv4 addresses, and we seem to be running out of those as well.
    --
    There are two types of people in the world: those who divide people into two types and those who don't.
  4. Cool, but ho hum in the year 2075 by caywen · · Score: 2, Funny

    Definitely sounds like a good bet for getting us past Moore's Law after 2065. I think electron spin technology will carry us from 2050-2060, and quantum spooky effect chips will take us to 2075, but man, after that we're just screwed without this technology. Until 2065, though, we're just gonna have to live with million core chips suspended in a bathtub of liquid nitrogen. As long as it's cost effective!

  5. Re:PICs? by iamdrscience · · Score: 3, Funny

    Yes, but there are only so many initialisms available, they overlap regularly. My favorite one is POS, either "Point of Sale" or "Piece of Shit". I loved calling referring to the cash registers at my last job as POS systems because they were both.

  6. high-speed silicon optical modulator by iminplaya · · Score: 3, Funny

    Would spinning one those color wheels they use at the discos at 10,000rpm work?

    --
    What?
  7. Re:PICs by jedimark · · Score: 2, Funny

    At least one (sad) person though that was funny and relevant..

    I wish these companies would stop pinching trademarks when they create stupid acronyms.. If it's leads to 40ghz chips and technology, they should put a little more thought into a funkier ground-breaking name for their concept..

  8. This sucks for modding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    I mean how the hell am I gonna overclock light?

    1. Re:This sucks for modding by seanadams.com · · Score: 2, Funny

      I mean how the hell am I gonna overclock light?

      Immerse it in lead and then run it on Xrays. Duh.

    2. Re:This sucks for modding by tygerstripes · · Score: 2, Funny

      And now the Modders and Overclockers are set to polarise into two distinct communities - those who try to improve performance by reducing light-leakage, and those who prettify the setup by mounting a spinning disco-ball in their many-windowed case and grinding a refractive biohazard symbol into the top of their CPU...

      --
      Meta will eat itself
  9. Re:O-E converter by imgod2u · · Score: 4, Informative

    This is actually the main problem that is solved with this solution. Traditionally, electro-optical conversion was done using discrete components. This consumed a great deal of power and also added the extra restriction that a separate, optical modulator had to be added along with the central electronic chip. It also meant that the electronic chip had to somehow send a very fast electrical signal (and all the attenuation that would occur to it) to the optical module.

    The optical IC they came up with isn't optical entirely. The internal logic is still electrical but they've managed to do a silicon-level electro-optical converter and directly send the optical signal out (I'm guessing through a microlens). This isn't likely to make internal logic (the next Pentium...wait they don't use that name anymore) calculate faster, but it'll be interesting to see this used as a RAM interface, for instance, or for multi-processor interconnect.

  10. Re:PICs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    ISTR that if we assume that most TLAs consist of the 26 ASCII letters (case-insensitive), and therefore there are 26^3=17576 TLAs. However, according to
    http://www.internetworldstats.com/blog.htm, there are currently 1,173,109,925 internet users. Clearly, there are not enough TLAs to go around, and so I propose TLAv2. TLAv2 will increase the number of available TLAs to 8031810176; this is almost seven times the number of people currently using the internet!

    These fancy new seven-letter three letter acronyms (FNSLTLAs) also appeal because those using them will be able to spell out such phrases as DEDBEEF and PATRIOT (whoops, I think that one may already be taken). This, in addition to the easy availability of addresses (IANA will be selling a 26-address block, for example BOOBIE{A through Z}, for less than the price of a single TLAv1 address)

  11. Re:I for one... by Nullav · · Score: 2, Funny

    PICs or it didn't happen.

    --
    I just read Slashdot for the articles.