Slashdot Mirror


Cell Towers Not Responsible For Illness

drewmoney notes a BBC article on a major UK study of whether cell towers (or "mobile phone masts" as they are called in the UK) cause illness. The study concluded strongly that symptoms of illness caused by mobile phone masts are all in the mind. People claiming sensitivity to radio emissions showed more symptoms in trials, according to the article, whether signals were being emitted or not. Quoting: "Dozens of people who believed the masts triggered symptoms such as anxiety, nausea and tiredness could not detect if signals were on or off in trials. However, the Environmental Health Perspectives study stressed people were nonetheless suffering 'real symptoms.' Campaign group Mast Sanity said the results were skewed as 12 people in the trials dropped out because of illness."

1 of 355 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Bad science or bad science reporting? by pe1rxq · · Score: 5, Informative

    That was not the reason for the test....

    They tested a short-term effect claimed by people who call themself 'sensitive' to RF transmitters.
    Those people claim that those transmitters have an almost immediate effect on them.

    When a short term effect is claimed, you test for that short term effect.
    And in this case when they properly blinded those people they found no short term effect.

    Simple summary: The short term effect claimed by these people is bullshit, there might or might not be a long term effect but this test doesn't cover it in any way.

    --
    Secure messaging: http://quickmsg.vreeken.net/