Firefox and IE Still Not Getting Along
juct writes "Heise describes a new demo showing how Firefox running under Windows XP SP2 can be abused to start applications. For this to work, however, Internet Explorer 7 needs to be installed. This severe security problem promises another round in the 'who-is-to-blame-war' between Mozilla and Microsoft. Mozilla currently is leading the race for a patch, as they have one ready in their bugzilla database. 'The authors of the demo note that there are many further examples of such vulnerabilities via registered URIs. What is so far visible is just "the tip of the iceberg". They state that registered URIs are tantamount to a remote gateway into your computer. To be on the safe side, users should, in the authors' opinion, deregister all unnecessary URIs - without, however, elucidating which are superfluous.'"
To be on the safe side, users should, in the authors' opinion, deregister all unnecessary URIs - without, however, elucidating which are superfluous.
I can answer that one for ya - Everything that FireFox doesn't handle internally; So basically, kill everything except "http", "https", and "ftp".
If you want to send email, open your email program and paste the address in. If you want to read newsgroups, open your newsreader and select the desired group. If you want to use some specialized protocol that requires a dedicated app anyway (like many P2P URIs), open them in the appropriate program.
Your web browser should not serve as a no-click interface to every network-enabled app on your machine. Period.
"It is Firefox's fault. They're invoking a Windows API directly without doing any sanity checking on the input." According to your masters its the receiving application that should do the sanity check. There was a rather heated debate on this a while ago when it was IE who forwarded malicious URLS to Firefox. Also, Firefox told IE to open an URL for all it knows, not some random application. The error is in IE7 no matter how you spin it. Dont forget any application besides Firefox can forward this kinds of URLs to IE7. In short any application you use that connects to web pages is a threat to IE7.
HTTP/1.1 400
Actually, while incredibly insecure, it is kinda cool to be able to slap in any program path in that malformed string and open any program.
d ".exe../../../../../../../../Program Files/CCP/EVE/eve.exe " - " blah.bat
For example, try this one if you have EVE installed on your PC: (You will have to copy-paste it as the Slashdot filter prevents the links from working.)
snews:%00%00../../../../../../windows/system32/cm
Official Heretic from the "Church of Global Warming". Proven right thanks to whistle blowers. AGW = Flat Earth Theory
Why should the browser be able to run privileged commands on the OS? Why should it have access to anything other than the cache directory?
sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
If you'd just speak formally _all_ the time, that'd be one less source of confusion for the unwashed masses. It turns out these things aren't inbuilt; they have to be learned from exposure. By denying exposure in the desperation to be understandable, you rob them of the chance of understanding in the long term.
StoneCypher is Full of BS
Here's a solution. Look at your status bar. If you see some wacko, malformed mailto: address appear when you hover over the link, don't click on it. The damned thing is longer than my arm! If it doesn't say joeuser@domain.foo, don't click. That simple.
Not that simple. Many browsers allow the remote site to change the string in the status bar by default (that's the first thing I disable). Until browsers show you the real destination by default, you can't expect people to notice the malformed mailto:
Opus: the Swiss army knife of audio codec