Slashdot Mirror


Wikipedia Infiltrated by Intelligence Agents?

An anonymous reader writes "International Humanitarian Law professor Ludwig Braeckeleer thinks so. In an article published yesterday in the Korean newspaper OhMyNews, he reveals a discovery he made while researching a story on the bombing of Pan Am Flight 103 over Scotland. It turns out that a Wikipedia administrator named SlimVirgin is actually Linda Mack, a woman who as a young graduate in the 1980s was hired by investigative reporter Pierre Salinger of ABC News to help with the investigation. Salinger later came to believe that Mack was actually working for Britain's MI5 on a mission to investigate the bombing and to infiltrate and monitor the news agency. Shortly after her Wikipedia identity was uncovered, many of her edits to articles related to the bombing were permanently removed from the database in an attempt to conceal her identity. This discovery comes only months after another Wikipedia admin was caught lying about his credentials to the press. What can Wikipedia do about those who would use it for their own purposes?"

2 of 428 comments (clear)

  1. get your facts straight troll by coaxial · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    I brought this up at the time, but everyone I brought it up to dismissed it. This is CENTCOM's job - US taxpayer's dollars to rewrite history, so that the US can keep going overseas militarily. It particularly annoyed me that I was paying the salary of the person trying to rewrite history. I kind of felt like I was battling someone in the bowels of the US's Orwellian version of "Minitru". Get your facts straight troll. CENTCOM is US Central Command. It is the US military's unified (i.e. interbranch) command for the middle east and central asia, excluding Israel. (Israel for some reason is under EUCOM.) It is not a propaganda arm of the US Military. CENTCOM's job is wage war. That's it. Do that have a PR arm? Of course! All large organizations do.

    Does that mean that someone with a centcom.mil address didn't edited wikipedia? No of course not. But then again, why shouldn't some soldier edit wikipedia? It's open to everyone.

    Now reading your edits, it makes me wonder why you have a bug up your ass about this, because the sections removed had to do with unverifyable assertions, namely that 300-400 people were killed even though bodies weren't found where they were reportedly buried. Since this unverifyable, it should not appear in wikipedia, as per wikipedia standards. If you want it there, verify it. Find those bodies. But just because you want it to be true, doesn't make it so, and doesn't entitle it to be there.

    It is interesting thing note that, Josh Rushing, the Marine public relations officer, now works for Al Jazeera English.

    In the mid-1990s, I got a strange SNMP request from an army intelligence outfit in Quantico, Virginia after reading Australian web sites which discussed possible CIA involvement in overthrowing Australia's government in the 1970's (the Whitlam/Kerr thing).

    Yeah yeah. The Man thinks you're a grave threat.

    Hate to bust bubble, but contrary to what you mom told you, no one gives a shit about you because you're just not special.
  2. Durova at www.encyclopediadramatica.com/Durova by Durovawatch · · Score: 0, Flamebait
    Lise, Lise, Lise Diane Broer They have your number on this page. You have perfected dispassion in lying to an art and you aren't really that good at it. Durova has been going back to Jimbo and assuring him that she's convinced you to not believe this is true here: "Jimbo, by the end of the thread that editor seems pretty well convinced that the rumor was baseless. Perhaps he or she will follow up on some leads for Wikinews? I'd be glad to see that curiosity put to constructive use. Perhaps a few encouraging words from you would help in that direction. DurovaCharge! 01:08, 30 July 2007 (UTC) " http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_tal k:Jimbo_Wales&diff=prev&oldid=147960859 Lise/Durova is writing on Wikipedia to DENY, DENY, DENY, here:

    "How about WP:DENY? No matter how Signpost approaches it, coverage would either draw attention to the identity of a contributor who prefers to remain anonymous or expose some uninvolved and misidentified person to greater risk of harassment. DurovaCharge! 16:12, 29 July 2007 (UTC)"
    http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedi a:Wikipedia_Signpost/Newsroom/Suggestions&diff=pre v&oldid=147872212 Lise hides the links here: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedi a:Wikipedia_Signpost/Newsroom/Suggestions&diff=pre v&oldid=147857491 http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedi a:Wikipedia_Signpost/Newsroom/Suggestions&diff=pre v&oldid=147856870 http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedi a:Administrators'_noticeboard&diff=prev&oldid=1475 69843 Why does Lise care? Because both Slimvirgin and Durova (Linda Mack and Lise Diane Broer) broke a deal they made with Daniel Brandt. They were to take down his article (that he'd been trying to get down for two years, that Slimvirgin/Linda wrote), and he would hide their names on his site, and wikipediareview.com redacted them. Brandt's site didnt go down, really, and their names went back up. So Slimvirgin and Durova are in this together. Durova is a very nasty admin. She has a page up on Encyclopedia Dramatica http://www.encyclopediadramatica.com/Durova/, which details what kind of abuses shes done. Slim has a page up on Wikitruth. Lise is a consummate liar, and like one of the other responders on this thread said, she's not a good liar, but she has the cool dispassion down to an art, and it fools a lot of people. It doesn't fool us. Don't let her fool you. :') despite the fact that Wikipediareview.com has had information on Linda Mack being Slimvirgin for years. Such good information that she and Lise/Durova bargained with wikipediareview to remove their names from the site. That lasted about one month, when Lise and Linda didnt fulfill their side of the deal. Lise and Linda