Slashdot Mirror


US Dept. of Justice May Intervene To Help RIAA

NewYorkCountryLawyer writes "In a Corpus Christi, Texas, case, Atlantic v. Boggs, where the defendant interposed a counterclaim alleging that the RIAA's $750-per-song file damages theory is unconstitutional, and the RIAA moved to dismiss the counterclaim, the US Department of Justice has sought and obtained an extension of time in which to decide whether to intervene in the case on the side of the RIAA. What probably precipitated the issue is that the constitutional question was raised not just as a defense as it was in UMG v. Lindor, but as a counterclaim, thus prompting a dismissal motion by the RIAA."

6 of 215 comments (clear)

  1. Burden in counterclaim? by EveryNickIsTaken · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Is it now the responsibility of the RIAA / US DOJ to show that the $750/song is constitutional? Or is it the defendant's responsibility to show it is unconstitutional? How would this work?

  2. Re:So much for the government working for the peop by TheRealMindChild · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You know the REAL problem here? Is they DON'T work for you, and they don't really CARE what you say you want. And the kicker is, they will likely STILL get reelected.

    --

    "When life gives you lemons, don't make lemonade. Make life take the lemons back!" -- Cave Johnson
  3. Re:DoJ is helping out a huge corporation?! by nuzak · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's not even about contributions. They have money, therefore they are afforded respect and deference at our own expense. They're "good for the economy". They don't have to give much of the money away at all, just show it off, much like a peacock's feathers, or my preferred analogy, a baboon's ass.

    Anything that's Good For The Economy is what Must Be Done. All other pursuits, goals, and ideals of this country are secondary to The Economy.

    --
    Done with slashdot, done with nerds, getting a life.
  4. Re:DoJ is helping out a huge corporation?! by Johnny5000 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    How funny that our tax dollars are being used to help a beligerant corporation make it's case, but why doesn't the common citizen get such help?

    Maybe I'm missing something here...


    You're not missing anything.

    The government doesn't even pretend to be on the side of the 'little guy' anymore.
    They used to at least give lip service to the idea, but now they don't even try to hide their kleptocracy.

    --
    The libertarian solution to the failures of capitalism is to apply more capitalism til the failures are fixed.
  5. Re:An excellent idea by SoulRider · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Damn, if that site isnt satire Im buying a gun.

  6. Re:You forget you can't spell DMCA without the *D* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Bigger hint: It's BOTH parties. BOTH parties are in the pockets of the corporations. Like the Soviets, here in the USSA we have only one party: the Republicrats. This party actually has two wings. One wing wants to tax and spend, the other wing wants to borrow and spend. One wing is for the corporations, while the other wing is for the corporations.

    Unlike the Soviets, the Republicrat Party has convinced the citizens of the USSA that their vote does indeed count (at least the 45% of the citizens of the USSA who actually go to the polls). And they have convinced the 45% who go to the polls that the 55% who don't are apathetic. Well actually they are, who cares which one wins when neither has our interests at heart?

    The corporations, each and every one of them, finance the USSA's elections 100%. Each corporation "contributes" to both wings of The Party.

    When that great American corporation Sony can "donate" to both major parties of an election, it doesn't care who loses, Sony wins.

    Shortly after they start snowball fighting in hell there will be two laws passed.
    1. It will be illegal to donate to more than one candidate in any given race, as bribery is WRONG.
    2. It will be illegal to donate to any candidate one is not eligible to cast a vote for. I can't vote for Senator Hatch's opponent without moving to Utah and registering there, Bill Gates can't donate to Dick Durbin without moving to Illinois and registering here, and neither my employer nor my union can donate to anybody at all.

    -mcgrew (splitting my vote vetween the Libertarians and Greens. I won't waste my vote on someone who not only doesn't represent me, but represents those whose interests are diametrically opposed to mine).