Slashdot Mirror


Blue Blu-ray

TopSpin writes "Early this year the meme circulated that Blu-ray might be going the way of Betamax, and for the exact same reason: Sony's unfriendliness to the porn industry. But at Japan's recent euphemistically named Adult Treasure Expo 2007, adult filmmakers said Sony has begun offering technical support, and this was later confirmed by Sony PR. The company stated that Sony would offer support to any filmmaker working on the format, no matter their industry. Apparently, Blu-ray is now the preferred medium for Japanese adult films."

78 of 396 comments (clear)

  1. Any consensus? by MontyApollo · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Is there any consensus in the geek community about which format is liked best?

    1. Re:Any consensus? by AuMatar · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Normal DVD- cracked DRM, and most people still don't have HD.

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
    2. Re:Any consensus? by hav0x · · Score: 5, Funny

      whichever the japanese adult filmmakers choose is fine by me.

    3. Re:Any consensus? by TheRealMindChild · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Meh. To me, it comes down to:

      • How much a burner costs
      • How much the media costs
      • How many commercial players will support burned movies of format x
      --

      "When life gives you lemons, don't make lemonade. Make life take the lemons back!" -- Cave Johnson
    4. Re:Any consensus? by mmarlett · · Score: 5, Funny

      The preferred format for the geek community is "teen girl". It will never quite completely erase the "big breast" format, though.

    5. Re:Any consensus? by C0rinthian · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah, because Sony treats their consumers MUCH better than MS does, right?

    6. Re:Any consensus? by cerelib · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If those are your only criteria, then regular DVD wins.

    7. Re:Any consensus? by MontyApollo · · Score: 2, Informative

      HD format and capacity was kind of implied.

    8. Re:Any consensus? by trolltalk.com · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Who wants H.D. pr0n? Do you really want to see cellulite, open pores, wrinkles, etc. all in high-def? You'll end up wishing porn really did make you go blind.

      Hi-def makes it much harder to fulfill people's fantasies with real-life actors. Even the producers are complaining about it.

    9. Re:Any consensus? by Virak · · Score: 2, Insightful

      How much would you pay to see HD mosaic???
      The exact same amount I pay to see SD mosaic.

      Seriously, who the fuck buys porn?
    10. Re:Any consensus? by fbjon · · Score: 5, Funny

      Who wants H.D. pr0n? Do you really want to see cellulite, open pores, wrinkles, etc. all in high-def? You'll end up wishing porn really did make you go blind. Hi-def makes it much harder to fulfill people's fantasies with real-life actors. Even the producers are complaining about it. I demand a sample to assess the veracity of this claim.
      --
      True confidence comes not from realising you are as good as your peers, but that your peers are as bad as you are.
    11. Re:Any consensus? by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Normal DVD- cracked DRM, Hasn't HD-DVD and Blu-Ray already been cracked repeatedly, with BD+ protection as yet untested in the market?

      and most people still don't have HD. You can get VGA monitors with better than HD resolution. My 21" screen is driven at 2048x1536 (QXGA), more than enough for 1920x1080p, and at less than half the price of most dual-link DVI displays (WQXGA: 2560×1600).

      Still being compatible with my KVM switch and the legacy machines on it is a plus.
      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    12. Re:Any consensus? by cerelib · · Score: 2, Informative

      It is not implied. The OP made no mention of capacity being a deciding factor. You could package HD content on DVD, but to get a full length movie it would probably have to span multiple discs. Given the logic of the poster, the price of burners, price of media, and device support, DVD still wins even if you consider using it for HD content.

    13. Re:Any consensus? by Architect_sasyr · · Score: 3, Funny

      The lovely people who rip it into nice manageable .torrent files for the rest of us?

      --
      Me failed English...
      FreeBSD over Linux. If my comments seem odd, this may explain...
    14. Re:Any consensus? by Citizen+of+Earth · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Hi-def makes it much harder to fulfill people's fantasies with real-life actors.

      I think the producers who use 18-year-old girls will do just fine with this medium. The producers who use 40-year-old women with fake tits—and plots—should go out of business anyway.

    15. Re:Any consensus? by Trogre · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, yes.

      Next question?

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    16. Re:Any consensus? by glitch23 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Who wants H.D. pr0n? Do you really want to see cellulite, open pores, wrinkles, etc. all in high-def? You'll end up wishing porn really did make you go blind.

      Not to mention that Japanese porn will have HD blurring out of portions of the video. Awesome!

      --
      this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom. -- Lincoln, Gettysburg Address
    17. Re:Any consensus? by Gabest · · Score: 2, Funny

      Just use cgi to render our perfect pr0n, it's the 21th century.

    18. Re:Any consensus? by westlake · · Score: 3, Interesting
      most people still don't have HD.

      That is changing very rapidly.

      30% of American households have HDTV.
      44% of these households receive HD programming.
      The "home theater" movie and gaming experience can be more important to buyers than HD programming

      >it's easy to forget that this will often be a buyer's first experience with large screen, wide screen, projection, flat panel displays,etc.
      >which is good news in the long run for Sony and Blu-Ray.

      2/3 get their HD programming by cable TV. 1/4-1/3 by satellite.

      30% of U.S. Households Have an HDTV: CEA

    19. Re:Any consensus? by ShawnMcCool42 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Who cares if most people have whatever? The point is that there's plenty of us that do (it's not that expensive, at all) and there's a market for it.

    20. Re:Any consensus? by CastrTroy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Which brings up a good question. Back in the 80s?? when the VHS-Betamax war was raging, there wasn't many ways to get porn. You could either buy magazines, which were just pictures, or you could buy video cassettes. Now we have the internet. With all the pay-for and free porn on the internet, I think that buying porn in a brick and mortar store will disappear pretty fast. I don't think that porn availability will be the deciding factor in which format wins this time around, because most of the people who are up-and-up on technology, who will be buying the new HD disc players are on the internet, and getting their porn from there.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    21. Re:Any consensus? by That's+Unpossible! · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Let me know when you've got a 50-70" widescreen TV.

      It has nothing to do with extreme detail, it has to do with making giant TVs look just as sharp as your 20" TV... stretching a picture made for a small TV (SD) onto a large TV (HD) looks like shit.

      --
      Ironically, the word ironically is often used incorrectly.
    22. Re:Any consensus? by Belacgod · · Score: 2, Funny

      If I watch one more stupid repairman story, I -will- plotz, that's for sure!

    23. Re:Any consensus? by king-manic · · Score: 2, Informative

      Almost 1/3 have HDTV? Really? I live in Canada, and it isn't that different from the USA up here, and I cannot believe that for a second. I would say that maybe 10% of the people I know own an HDTV. And I know some people with a lot of money. Most people I know just don't see the need for it. Granted most people will probably buy HDTV when it's time to upgrade, since it's hard to find a decent SDTV, but people aren't just running out and buying these things.

      Happen to live on th far east coast where ma and pa have only a quarter and nickel to rub together? Over here in Alberta almost every house hold in my family and friends has one. Of course the housing boom in my city has made everyone more flamboyant with their spending but it's very common here. In my family of close cousins all of them have one in their house/condo. In my circle of friend all of them except the "suffering for my art" ones have one too. Anecdotal certainly. but so is your evidence.

      --
      "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
    24. Re:Any consensus? by quanticle · · Score: 4, Funny

      Great, as if hentai tentacle rape wasn't detailed enough...

      --
      We all know what to do, but we don't know how to get re-elected once we have done it
    25. Re:Any consensus? by Carewolf · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There are better algorithms that stretching. There is no reason a SD 50" TV shouldn't look good. Unfortunately people buy shitty DVD-players. I start grinding the axe everytime I see de-interlace artifacts, or boxy pixels on a big screen.

  2. Blu-kake by Dude+McDude · · Score: 5, Funny

    Those crazy Japanese!!!

  3. The Swing Content by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 5, Funny

    The porn industry is perfectly capable of going both ways... and a few others besides.

    --
    Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
  4. Blu-Ray Job by TheWizardTim · · Score: 2, Funny

    Watch out for job postings looking for "Blu-Ray Job" experience.

  5. Za eentaenetto eesu foru porun by lohphat · · Score: 2, Funny

    Avenue Q FTW!

  6. Difference? by lymond01 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Without looking at the tubes, I've been curious (not too) about the end user functional difference between blu-ray and HD-DVD (aside from one having fewer syllables). Is it like buying a red porsche cayenne or a blue porsche cayenne? I'm not sure how two devices can compete with each other if they are essentially the same. Will their market lifetime boil down to non-technical reasons, as stated in the article? Is there some nifty upgrade path that one allows over the other?

    1. Re:Difference? by harryk · · Score: 2, Informative

      without getting to the nitty gritty details. It's something like your example.

      think more like the porsche and the toureg. Both essentially luxury class suvs, one costs more than the other, but essentially still just a sporty suv.

      The difference really is space. compare say ... the sporty suv to an escalade or something. Both still luxury, but one can physically fit more inside.

      I believe hd-dvd is on the order of 15-20gb, where a blu-ray disc is 50-60gb. So the blu-ray disc can hold the same length movie, with less compression, and as a result ( theortically ) a better image.

      there are a number of technical differences, but the end user I think is more concerned with the physical aspects of data storage, wether for audio/video or data, which is why I think (opinion only) Blu-ray is the better format.

      cheers,
      harryk

      --
      think before you write, it'll save me moderator points.
    2. Re:Difference? by GreatDrok · · Score: 4, Informative

      "I believe hd-dvd is on the order of 15-20gb, where a blu-ray disc is 50-60gb. So the blu-ray disc can hold the same length movie, with less compression, and as a result ( theortically ) a better image."

      HD DVD is 15GB (I have no idea what a gb is) per layer. Blu-Ray is 25GB per layer. Both can come in dual layer formats and so HD DVD can have up to 30GB and Blu-Ray 50GB. Both support exactly the same video and audio codecs and also AACS DRM although Blu-Ray has an additional layer of encryption which HD DVD lacks although it hasn't be used yet. Blu-Ray is also region encoded whereas HD DVD isn't so you can buy your discs from anywhere in the world if you buy them on HD DVD but you can only buy them within your own region if you buy Blu-Ray.

      Picture quality wise there is nothing in it. In all the tests so far, HD DVD has been equal or better where the film is available on both formats. Truth is, a 1080p HD signal can easily fit into 30GB using VC-1. A number of Blu-Ray discs are still using MPEG2 which is less efficient and is why they don't look as good as the HD DVD VC-1 equivalent.

      In the end, the technical differences are small enough not to make the slightest difference. Physically, the discs are the same dimensions and a combi drive is practical so there is no reason to believe that a cheap multiformat player won't exist. Samsung is supposed to be releasing their DVD/HD DVD/Blu-Ray combi player in europe for 400 shortly and it will support all formats fully.

      Personally, I bought an HD DVD drive for my Xbox 360 so I would have some HD material for my HD TV and HD projector. For the money I would have been daft not to and there were enough films on the format to get me started. Even today, there is little to choose between HD DVD and Blu-Ray when it comes to choice of films. Compared with DVD, HD DVD is definitely clearer and has richer colours and deeper blacks. I have an upscaling HDMI DVD player which helps make DVD look very good, but HD DVD is definitely better. When the combi player becomes available I will buy one and use that instead of my Xbox 360 and also have the option of Blu-Ray.

      --
      "I have the attention span of a strobe lit goldfish, please get to the point quickly!"
    3. Re:Difference? by masdog · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Um...in case you haven't been to a consumer electronics store in the last six months, there are more 3rd party Blu-Ray players than there are HD-DVD players total. Unlike Betamax, this isn't a Sony-only product.

    4. Re:Difference? by Stormwatch · · Score: 5, Funny

      The difference is that nobody has any idea what the difference is between DVD-R and DVD+R.
      The difference is very clear, when you think about it. See, one is negative, the other is positive. So you use DVD-R to store emo songs, drama movies, professional images, and war-themed 3D shooters; and use DVD+R to store pop-rock songs, comedies, funny cat pics, and 2D platformers.
    5. Re:Difference? by Night+Goat · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Personally, I bought an HD DVD drive for my Xbox 360 so I would have some HD material for my HD TV and HD projector.

      You should definitely look into getting an antenna hooked up to pull down some over-the-air HD programming. I thought I'd need some mega-huge antenna to get a signal because I live in a rural area, but I was able to use a powered rabbit ear antenna and I can get the five or six stations that broadcast near me. It looks really good, too. Saturday baseball on Fox is a highlight of the week for me now, because of the increased clarity and the wide screen view. You can see a lot more of the action. You might already know about OTA reception, but I'm surprised how many of my friends bought really nice HDTVs and are just using analog cable or analog broadcast TV.
    6. Re:Difference? by cyphercell · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So when I have a terabyte disk on my PC in five years, do I want to do my backups with 34 HD disks or 20 Blu-Ray disks? Do I want the whole collection of star wars on one disk or two. Honestly I think the storage space will make a difference more than anything.

      --
      Under the influence of Post-Cyberpunk Gonzo Journalism
  7. Am I the only one who just doesn't care about HD? by bigtangringo · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I really don't care for the HD craze, I still buy plain old DVDs. Am I really in the minority?

    --
    Yes, I am a smart ass; it's better than the alternative.
  8. All hail by earnest+murderer · · Score: 4, Funny

    our pixelated vagina overlords!

    --
    Platform advocacy is like choosing a favorite severely developmentally disabled child.
  9. Why bother by NaCh0 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Now you can see the blurred out parts in HD.

  10. Porn is irrelevant by DrXym · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Porn is not going to decide HD formats. I don't know why this idiotic meme keeps springing up. Sure it may have had an impact on beta vs VHS where porn-friendly VHS offered an alternative to going to some sleazy porno theatre. But those days have past. Porn is readily and discretely available from thousands of internet sites, satellite, and conventional formats. The impact of some format supporting or not supporting porn is fairly low. Besides, there are Blu Ray porn titles if you really want your razor rash in HD so the whole argument is moot.

    1. Re:Porn is irrelevant by HappyEngineer · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It's not the porn, it's the control. If Sony is willing to effectively censor porn then they've proven they're willing to use their power to censor. Who wants to take a chance on a format controlled by someone who has demonstrated their willingness to censor?

    2. Re:Porn is irrelevant by LoverOfJoy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Do you really think the number of people who:
      1. are considering an HD player
      2. are porn consumers
      3. don't use the internet
      is a sizeable enough number to determine which HD format will succeed?

      Sure, the number of people in category 1 will rise over time but the number of people in group 3 will likely decline just as fast if not faster.

  11. Urban legends by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The original meme was wrong in the first place. Some people took an article that said that Sony would not press porn blu-ray disks, got confused, and announced that Sony wasn't going to allow porn on blu-ray. This was never the case. They never said they wouldn't license it for other people to press porn on blu-ray.

    This was all said at the time, of course, but people were more interested in being clever and announcing blu-ray's demise than actually researching the matter.

  12. I want storage, not HD. by khasim · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I don't care a bit about the video capabilities.

    I just want the gigabytes of storage. Inexpensive burners + inexpensive disks and I'll be happier.

  13. It's all in the name by Alioth · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Blu-Ray won't fail because of porn, it'll fail because of its name.

    Now what will Joe Sixpack think? He'll think WTF is Blu-Ray? I'll buy HD-DVD. I know what DVD is, and HD-DVD must be better DVD. So Joe Sixpack will buy the HD-DVD system because he knows what a DVD is but hasn't the faintest clue what Blu-Ray is.

    1. Re:It's all in the name by noamsml · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Advertising, advertising, advertising. Do you think the DVD brand sprang out of nothing?

    2. Re:It's all in the name by Heftklammerdosierer! · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Or Mr. Sixpack will think HD-DVD is just an incremental upgrade to regular DVD, while Blu-Ray is something new and better.

    3. Re:It's all in the name by blhack · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Now what will Joe Sixpack think? He will have the oppurtunity to explain to the rest of the frat that blu-ray is better because it uses a blu laser, instead of a green one like cassette tapes use.

      the name blu-ray sounds futuristic...unlike hd-dvd.
      --
      NewslilySocial News. No lolcats allowed.
  14. Mod Parent Insightful by Zantetsuken · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Mod the parent insightful - even if it totally fails as a video format or for games, it would still be useful for things like data backups (if it got cheap enough), maybe even to the point that it would be worth it for the average Joe Sixpack to perform bi-annual backups of his desktop or laptop (or for the bit-torrent people, all of the Battle Star Galactica episodes they've downloaded for example).

    1. Re:Mod Parent Insightful by misleb · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Nah, even now 50GB is probably not sufficient for a full backup for a lot of people. By the time writers become common, 50GB will be nothing.

      --
      "THERE IS NO JUSTICE, THERE IS ONLY ME." -Death
    2. Re:Mod Parent Insightful by ucblockhead · · Score: 2, Insightful

      When I first got a digital camera, I could back up all the pictures onto one CD. Eventually, it was two. Then, higher resolution camera, and it was three, then four. About the time it got up to six, I got a DVD burner and could back up to one DVD.

      Then, of course, more pictures, a higher resolution camera and I'm now up to six CDs per backup. Probably in a year, I'll get a blu-ray or hd-dvd burner and be back down to one disk.

      --
      The cake is a pie
    3. Re:Mod Parent Insightful by Ivan+Todoroski · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Who modded this as insightful? So what if you can't fit everything on a single 50GB disc, there's still a hell of a difference between your backup taking 10 blu-ray discs or 100+ DVD-Rs.

      An order of magnitude jump in optical media capacity is always welcome.

  15. Not really by bjdevil66 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Call me when:

    1. Decent, large wide-screen HDTVs (LCDs, Plasmas, etc.) cost about $300-$400.
    2. The HD-DVD or Blu-Ray debate is settled so I'm not buying the wrong tech.
    3. Shopping for above parts or components is simplified or culled down a bit (I don't have to read a dozen articles to understand every bit of the technology - 720p, 1080i, compatibility issues, etc. - I just want it to work)
    4. Hooking it all up is easy enough to where I'm not reading manuals or HOWTOs (i.e. done in less than 15 minutes - why waste the time?)

    Until then, my nice,

  16. Blue Laws of the Colony of Connecticut by spun · · Score: 4, Informative

    I thought it came from the term blue law, which is any law designed to enforce a moral standard. I believe that term derives from the original Blue Laws of the Colony of Connecticut.

    --
    - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
  17. Re:Am I the only one who just doesn't care about H by garcia · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I really don't care for the HD craze, I still buy plain old DVDs. Am I really in the minority?

    No, you aren't but the industry definitely wants you to believe that you are. See the most recent commercial w/the dude from the Sopranos talking about his HD-DVD player and how it makes his regular DVDs look even better...

    They know that consumers are unlikely to upgrade so soon after their full conversion from VHS.

    ---

    My feeling as to why Sony is now playing with the Porn Industry is b/c Blu-Ray has yet to be cracked and they are hoping that with HD-DVD being toast that they will get to be the winner. With the porn industry a little annoyed by the pirating of their DVDs (but not taking the steps the MPAA is), they are hoping that they will be able to be better protected with the new format.

  18. No preferred media for me. by Chonine · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I am not looking to continue buying movies on plastic discs. Having movies sent through the mail or having to drive to a store should be unnecessary now. There are already a few internet on demand services for movies, and plenty of cable/satellite on demand services. Ownership services ala iTunes is probably around the corner. DRM-free would be ideal, so really whichever gets around to that first wins in my opinion. Not happening any time soon, but really not an issue in the debate. HD, Blueray, and iTunes all have it. With regards to pornography, I expect the industry will continue moving into the online direction. I suspect they will continue to be pioneers in the area actually.

    8 years ago I purged floppies from my life, ripping them out of every device I had, and saving all of that data to newer disc. Around 2 years ago I pretty much purged CD/DVD from everything, sans a single portable USB DVD-RW drive I can use for anything. Magnetic and optical medium had its time. Flash drives/cards, solid state disk drives, and networks should be everything. Of course, the transition is slow, but that's why I took a stand. I don't buy software, I install new OS' from the network or an existing partition. The DVDRW drive is a read once and rip solution for music CDs, and periodic DVD backup aside from rsync. Movies I use cable on demand services, DVR, and theaters.

    About the only reason why I would care for any next-generation disc medium would be for a viable backup solution. Not many available, nor cost effective at the moment. This is a pretty geeky view of everything, but I think that the general consumer trend will follow it. Most likely, both BlueRay and HD-DVD will slowly replace DVDs, but only when the cost is comparable for both the movies and for combination devices. The *real* next-generation media is when there is no media at all.

    1. Re:No preferred media for me. by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Last I heard, the Internet is not there yet. Seriously. I heard an analysis on the Digital Production Buzz that distribution of a top selling movies like Cars or Shrek is not possible with the current backbones that's available, where the amount of data on plastic & aluminum discs of the sales of just ONE movie in the first week of sales exceeded the aggregate backbone capacity several fold for the same period on the Internet. And lots of new movies are released every week.

      A better codec will shrink that down, but you aren't going to cut it down by more than half without losing picture quality. I really love how HD movies look, 1080p movies on a 1080p large projected screen is exceedingly nice. I'm not going to like anything that's bitrate starved to save on bandwidth. Disney's Pirates of the Carribean regularly exceeded 20Mbps, and that was with H.264 AVC.

      The *real* next-generation media is when there is no media at all.

      I think "next" generation kind of falls apart here, it really applies to both HD discs and internet downloads, though I Internet movies to be the final victor in the long run. I expect that there will be DVD, HD disc and internet streaming & downloads (with several formats within that) to coexist for some time.

  19. Hybrid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Suit yourself. I'll get myself the "Teen Girl" / "Big Breast" hybrid model.

    It may cost a bit more, I don't have to worry about choosing the wrong format.

  20. WHich is why Blu-Ray is winning by SuperKendall · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Toshiba is the ONLY hardware maker for HD-DVD drives.

    On the Blu-Ray side, you have players from Sony and Panasonic and Samsung and others (soon to be Funai players as well, the producer of the dirt-cheap DVD players for WalMart).

    Sony learned well the lessons of betamax (also including have the format with more storage, and more studio backing). It's a shame the HD-DVD backers didn't bother to examine history to see where they were headed.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  21. Blu-ray for blue movies. by serviscope_minor · · Score: 2, Funny

    Kind of makes sense if you think about it.

    --
    SJW n. One who posts facts.
  22. Porn never mattered in this war by SuperKendall · · Score: 4, Interesting

    For DVD and VHS, porn was a huge deal because it was difficult to obtain discreetly otherwise.

    But nowadays any kind of porn you can imagine, and many kinds you would rather not, are all online. Porn media sales are nothing now compared with total video sales. So even though Blu-Ray is getting more and more backing from adult studios, it will not really have any effect.

    On a side note though Japan and the US are in the same region with Blu-Ray, so Anime or other titles (such as this adult studio stuff) can all be imported directly. I'm just hoping most anime comes with English subtitles even just for Japanese release...

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  23. Re:High-def porn? No thanks. by desertfool · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Or it will make them realize that the inflated breast, bleach blonde actress isn't better then normal women. It may be a *good* thing for society.

    --
    Just a dude. Stuck in IT.
  24. Same about the PS3. by beswicks · · Score: 3, Funny

    Sony removing the vibrators from the PS3 controllers has clearly robbed the world of new and interesting uses and pushed back the development of Teledildonics, the bastards.

    Oh well maybe these blue blu-rays are comparable with Bluedildonics? At least the PS3 has bluetooth.

    (Yes I know that things other than PS3's can play the blu-ray).

    1. Re:Same about the PS3. by hmccabe · · Score: 2, Funny

      I hope the word "teledildonics" gets added to the SCIGEN database. I know I just added it to my system's dictionary.

  25. Apple is Blu-Ray? by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'd say Blu-Ray. It's holds more, it uses Java (instead of that thing MS developed for HD-DVD), it has a larger installed base at this point, has a cooler name, is backed by Apple, etc. I haven't upgraded to Final Cut Studio 2 yet, but in the previous version, it only supported HD-DVD, not Blu-Ray.
    --
    Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
  26. Re:Macs by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Apple originally sided with DVD-RAM.

    --
    Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
  27. Re:Macs by rbgaynor · · Score: 2, Insightful

    While you could use Macs to gauge when a new technology has "made it", Apple actually inflates the price of the hardware they sell and has a history of price-fixing.

    So you're saying Apple conspired with itself to not undercut itself on price?

    --
    "Good things don't end with eum, they end with mania or teria." - H. Simpson
  28. HDCP by jamie(really) · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I have a "first-gen" 1080P TV, and it only does 1080P over VGA, not HDMI. For some reason the HDMI can only handle 1080i. HD-DVD seems to be happy to pump HD content over non-HDCP channels, while Blu-Ray players (certainly the PS3) insists on a HDCP protected channel or it downscales. So I can get either 1080i blu-ray or 1080p HD-DVD. A lot of people have HD-TVs with no HDMI at all. Ouch.

    Of course, since I have one of those awful Vista computers that you guys complain so much about, there's a way around this, and I can watch both in 1080P.

    Personally, if a movie is available in both HD-DVD and Blu-Ray I buy the HD-DVD version, because studios have had a habit of encoding Blu-Ray discs using MPEG2 so that they look like shite. I got my Blu-Ray for $300 when CompUSA closed. If you have the choice between a $170 HD drive or a $600 Blu-Ray, the choice seems obvious to me if you can't wait. As has been said, even the 30Gb capacity of HD-DVD is more than double the amount you need for a ultra-high-quality movie recording. Otherwise, wait and get a combo player and you're safe whichever way it goes.

  29. Re:Am I the only one who just doesn't care about H by G-funk · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I didn't either, until I spent some time with HD content. My TV is small by US penis-measuring standards, it's only 32" and it's only 720p, but there's a HUGE difference between SD and HD content in some programming. CSI:Miami looks fantastic, as does Saturday night AFL, I think sport is definitely a place you can expect to see a lot of growth in HD in the near future, and where it really pays off.

    --
    Send lawyers, guns, and money!
  30. Re:Am I the only one who just doesn't care about H by aslate · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I agree with the quality difference, and when i move out i'll probably get me a HDTV instead of a standard one.

    I recently went through the BBC Planet Earth site and downloaded all the HD clips they have. I believe they're only 720p as well (just checked, they are) and so i've been playing them on my 19" PC monitor which does 1440x900. People forget that standard PC displays can often play HD content! The video is just amazing, the details on some of the footage such as the Angel Falls. Any UK resident (or someone with a UK proxy at hand) i would highly recommend Planet Earth HD.

    Put them on the HDTVs at work too, the number of people that stop and watch the telly we've got set up (compared to the shitty demo before) is startling.

  31. low level format by tepples · · Score: 2, Informative

    Except, I heard that the ATAPI signal for Eject is the same as the ATA signal for Low-Level Reformat Citation needed. As far as I can tell, ATAPI optical drives use the SCSI start/stop command to eject media. Besides, ATA hard drives don't really support a "low level format", as a true low level format writes embedded servo information, which requires more precision than the drive's own mechanism can provide and is done only at the factory. The "low level format" that you usually see in PC based utilities really just writes a constant value (often a block of 0x00 bytes) to each sector of the drive.
  32. Where are the 72 Hz TVs? by tepples · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Seems my TV doesn't do 24fps which is needed more than ever on the HD formats as they aren't tweaked the way DVD is to approximate the 25/30fps we normally see at home. But why is it so hard for a display to run at 72 Hz, so that each frame of video information covers three fields?
  33. Rock and a hard place by crovira · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If Sony tried that "We don't fart and we don't fuck on Blue-Ray" their share-holders would carve them up and eat them raw on vinagered rice patties.

    They REMEMBER the VHS-BetaMax debacle.

    That is not likely to happen again.

    Like Vespasian said, holding up the sesterces collected from the public toilets: "Money has no odor..."

    --
    MSBPodcast.com The opinions expressed here are my own. If you don't like 'em... Think up your own stuff.
    1. Re:Rock and a hard place by dgcurtis · · Score: 3, Informative

      Ah yes but porn is not going to determine the winner in the current format wars.

      Back the in VHS/BetaMAX days, the Internet wasn't available to every joe lunchbox with a $300 Nascar computer from Wal-Mart. There is so much free porn out there that people don't need to rent/buy it.

      Blu-ray has all the major studios except Universal and HD-DVD has less than that.

      Not that I really care. They'll both be cheap enough very soon that you'll be able to buy both formats.

    2. Re:Rock and a hard place by Bobartig · · Score: 2, Informative
      There was a rather larger issue to betamax which limited its adoption. From wikipedia (but cited in a bunch of places prior to wikipedia):

      Betamax held an early lead in the format war, offering some technical advantages. By 1980, VHS was gaining marketshare due to its longer tape time (3 hours maximum, compared to just 1 hour for Betamax in USA) and JVC's less strict licensing program. The longer tape time is sometimes cited as the defining factor in the format war, allowing consumers to record entire programs unattended
      --
      This is where I get my recommended daily allowance of "Foot in Mouth."
  34. BS revisionist history by FredThompson · · Score: 2, Informative

    Betamax failed because Sony wouldn't license the tech to other manufacturers at an affordable rate.

    The common belief is that porn made the VCR desired in households. The porn producers were smart enough to set a low price point.

    Those are 2 very different things.

  35. Re:AO Games by Ender77 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Actually, Sony,Microsoft,Nintendo has said that they will not allow AO titles on their systems. If it was distributors they could simply sell it on the companies website.