Slashdot Mirror


IBM Saves $250M Running Linux On Mainframes

coondoggie writes "Today IBM will announce it is consolidating nearly 4,000 small computer servers in six locations onto about 30 refrigerator-sized mainframes running Linux, saving $250 million in the process. The 4,000 replaced servers will be recycled by IBM Global Asset Recovery Services. The six data centers currently take up over 8 million square feet, or the size of nearly 140 football fields."

25 of 274 comments (clear)

  1. MOD THIS COMMENT THE FUCK DOWN!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic


       

  2. this article has been up a couple minutes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    and still not a single posting from a user. I believe this may be a sign that slashdot is dyi...

    whoa...

    First psot!

  3. Oblig. by Ethanol-fueled · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    But does it run....ah, hell. Um, imagine a beowulf cluster of...hmm.

    Fuck it. Who wants pizza?

  4. But will it blend? by StinkyPinky · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Sorry, I thought I would bring down the Slashdotters to the Digg level.

  5. Re:Proof of Linux's Environmentalist Friendlyness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Yes - the rhythm, the rebel

  6. Re:Proof of Linux's Environmentalist Friendlyness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Without a pause - I'm lowering my level

  7. Re:Proof of Linux's Environmentalist Friendlyness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    The hard rhymer - where you never been I'm in

  8. Re:Proof of Linux's Environmentalist Friendlyness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    You want stylin' - you know it's time again

  9. Re:Proof of Linux's Environmentalist Friendlyness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    They praised the music - this time they play the lyrics

  10. Re:Proof of Linux's Environmentalist Friendlyness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Some say no to the album, the show

  11. Re:Proof of Linux's Environmentalist Friendlyness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Bum rush the sound I made a year ago

  12. Re:Proof of Linux's Environmentalist Friendlyness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Not a sabbatical - yes to make it critical

  13. Re:Proof of Linux's Environmentalist Friendlyness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    The only part your body should be parting to

  14. Re:Proof of Linux's Environmentalist Friendlyness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Radio - suckers never play me

  15. Re:Proof of Linux's Environmentalist Friendlyness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    On the mix - just O.K. me

  16. Re:Proof of Linux's Environmentalist Friendlyness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Now known and grown when they're clocking my zone it's known

  17. Re:Proof of Linux's Environmentalist Friendlyness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Snakin' and takin' everything that a brother owns

  18. Re:Proof of Linux's Environmentalist Friendlyness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Recorded and orderd - supporter of Chesimard

  19. Re:Proof of Linux's Environmentalist Friendlyness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Loud and proud kickin' live next poet supreme

  20. Re:Proof of Linux's Environmentalist Friendlyness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Loop a troop, bazooka, the scheme

  21. Re:Proof of Linux's Environmentalist Friendlyness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Flavor - a rebel in his own mind

  22. Re:Proof of Linux's Environmentalist Friendlyness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Supporter of my rhyme

  23. Re:Must be SCO jacked up the rates... by Airline_Sickness_Bag · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    SCO owns the rights to the original (AT&T) Unix code. (Maybe. Novell claims they still own the rights and the SCO was just their license collector).

    There is no "Maybe" about it. SCO does not own any of the System V code - they own Unixware and Opensewer, just like SGI owns Irix. None of the copyrights on the SysV code transferred to The Santa Cruz Operation, let alone SCO/Caldera. And SCO has not provided any documentation that shows what (code) copyrights were transferred with the specificity required by law. SCO owes Novell millions of dollars for the licences they sold to Microsoft and SUN - despite their claims that those licenses do not fall under the contract with Novell (I.e., not about SysV), their filings to the Security and Exchange Commission state that they were about SysV.

    According to their contract with SCO, SCO is to collect the royalties and pass them directly to Novell. Novell then gives them 5% of it.

    Not all Unix licensees pay royalties - IBM and Sun have fully paid up licences. So they never give SCO a cent.

  24. Re:Proof of Linux's Environmentalist Friendlyness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    You, sir, have way too much time on your hands. I suggest a new hobby.

  25. Re:No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Don't forget the love shack. Gotta have the love shack.