Ubuntu Linux vs. Mac OS X
An anonymous reader writes "An article on InformationWeek pits an Apple user against an Ubuntu Linux user (although he talks about other distros as well) as to which OS makes a better desktop operating system. As might be expected, the conclusion seems to be "different strokes for different folks," but it's interesting to see Microsoft cut (mostly) out of the equation."
Comment removed based on user account deletion
Apparently only idiots appreciate a car that handles well.
W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
Search for a torrent of the hacked OS.
One of the big flaws with this kind of comparison is that people almost always start with a Mac and try to build a comprable PC. Apple's hardware selection is rather limited, but is well equipped. By doing the comparison this way, you could end up ignoring a lot of options on the PC side of things. For example, I have a laptop with a 1400x1050 14" screen, of which Apple offers nothing comprable. You also ignore a lot of the budget options that most people would be perfectly happy with. Secondly, Apple's machines are pretty well equipped - however, I don't always want the full package they offer. If I start with a PC configuration I'm happy with, I'll almost always find out to get the same thing in a Mac I end up moving rather quickly up Apple's lineup to end up with a machine that has what I want in my PC, but a whole lot more along with the attached price tag. For example, when it's time to get a new tower, I can usually get a pretty nice one for about $1000-$1200 that I'm happy with. To get waht I want in a Mac usually turns out to be a PowerMac/MacPro at $2000-$2500.