Slashdot Mirror
KDE 4.0 Beta 1 Released
dbhost writes "Along with this morning's cup of coffee and log reviews, I discovered that the KDE team is moving forward with a long awaited beta release of KDE 4.0 beta release of KDE 4.0. The most interesting item I found in the notes is that the file manager in KDE is being separated from Konqueror into a component called Dolphin. Also, according to the announcement, konsole has been treated to a number of improvements such as split view, and history highlighting."
Because browsing to audiocd:/ and dragging the contents of the "MP3" virtual directory to your ~/Music is such a stupid GUI. You really have no clue about the power of ioslaves, do you?
Pirate Party UK
I disagree.
I think that one of the most revolutionary end-user paradigm shifts that Microsoft ever did was to compiler Internet Explorer and Windows Explorer into one.
Think about it. The Internet, a seamless extension of your desktop. Why shift between the two? When broadband first came out, everything clicked into place, and I understood the eloquence of having IE and Explorer as one. Pick a window, type a website, get my data. Hit back. On my hard drive again.
Konqueror accomplishes this to even a greater extent. KDE has horrible UI in so many places, but they got one thing (more or less) right. Konqueror goes out of its way to integrate all the various file management techniques into one.
SFTP, ick, under Windows, have to load up some separate program to manage it.[1] In KDE, nope. It is just an extension of my computer. Not even an extension, except for the latency, it IS my computer. Files and web sites sharing tabs, why not?
I also loved having tabbed file browsing. I (just) missed out on the Dual Pane file manager craze, but tabbed file managers are a good substitute.
KDE sucks in a thousand other small (medium sized, and large) ways. Heck in of itself Konqueror has at least half a dozen UI issues that can be spotted within the first 5 minutes of using it. But do not claim that it is not very "Unix" like.
It is very Unix like. Files are files, a file is a file is a file. Does it really matter where it resides?
[1]Actually 2 commerical programs exist that allow the user to mount SFTP and SCP connections as drives. They still suck compared to FISH though.
Need help treating your acne? Come here!
If the integration of Internet Explorer and Explorer were so seamless, then why do they still have separate icons for My Computer, My Network Places, and Internet Explorer? The reality is that these services are not the same.
The operative word being "sell"...
E17 doesn't needs "more devs". E17 needs to:
- Release SOMETHING, even if it's incomplete, because if you try to be perfect you won't never have a product. Releasing "incomplete" products allows you to attract people and then have more programming resources. The KDE guys are not going to include some of the promises of KDE 4.0 until 4.1 which means that KDE 4.0 will be incomplete.....AND WHO CARES? E17 did beat Mac OS X and Vista in some fields before Vista was released, but since they don't release anything, now vista and mac os x have released infrastructure to do what E did before them, now E looks like they're catching up, and in some sense it's true.
- Realize that enlightenment only has sense if you aim to be a full desktop, not just a "desktop shell". I like enlightenment, but then those guys say that E17 "will not compete with GNOME or KD"E....so I keep using GNOME/KDE. They aren't so good in the graphic field as E, but since they are the ones that are desktops, it only has sense to improve and support those, not the one that is not aiming to bring good linux desktops to the masses. Technology itself is cool, but if you don't make it have real-world applications then I don't care.
Of course, if you don't use KDE apps you can't benefit from their integration. For me it's the opposite. I try to use as many KDE apps as possible. Sure, konqueror-the-web-browser is not quite as compatible or full featured as Firefox, but it integrates much nicer with the rest of KDE (spell check, password saving, file downloading, mimetype handling, keyboard shortcuts, file dialogs, configuration, widgets) that I use it 95% of the time over Firefox. Instead of Thunderbird I use Kontact and webmail, instead of Mplayer there is Codeine, and for most simple image editing tasks Krita and Kolourpaint are good enough so I rarely have to reach for the Gimp. The only app that really has no replacement is Openoffice, and with the KDE integration module it more or less fits into the desktop.
I would much rather see Konqueror and KOffice improve to surpass Firefox/Openoffice than have those projects given up. If you've ever seen the Mozilla codebase (or even worse, the Openoffice one) you wouldn't want anyone to be forced to work on that mess. Open source projects need to place the utmost importance on code quality to attract new developers. There aren't a lot of people willing to contribute to an open source project purely in their free time in the first place, and making the codebase hostile is a great way of scaring off those precious few. Without the commercial backing of Sun and the Mozilla foundation, neither Openoffice or Firefox would be even remotely close to where they are today. While all the grunt work has made them both into nice products, I don't like betting the farm on something that is essentially reliant on a constant influx of cash to keep going.