Slashdot Mirror


Broadcasters Want Cash For Media Shared At Home

marcellizot writes "What would you say if I told you that there are people out there that want to make sharing your media between devices over a home network illegal? According to Jim Burger, a Washington, D.C attorney who deals with piracy in the broadcasting industry, certain broadcasters want to do just that. Speaking in a recent podcast, Burger remarked that the broadcasting industry is keen to put controls on sharing media between devices even if those devices are on a home network and even if the sharing is strictly for personal use. When pressed as to why broadcasters would want to do this, Burger replied simply 'because they want you to pay for that right.'"

4 of 426 comments (clear)

  1. Re:specifics? by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 4, Informative

    On the plus side- this issue PREVENTED a workable IP treaty between the EU and the United States, so it's not becoming law until that treaty can be rewritten.

    OTOH- if this gets written into any sort of trade treaty, I will be fully justified in calling the writers of that treaty FREE TRAITORS.

    --
    SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
  2. Re:specifics? by compro01 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Not to mention if you don't like the price of bottled water, your tap provides gallons for pennies.

    and quite often that water comes from the tap anyway!

    --
    upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
  3. Re:specifics? by drewzhrodague · · Score: 3, Informative

    why does everything have to be illegal? are the artists who create the content having difficulty feeding their families on their meager earnings?

    As the son of a musician, a musician myself, and in a word yes. Many artists live the 'starving artist' lifestyle because it is generally not a line of work with which you can make any money at all. The popular musicians we hear about are 1 in 5,000,000 that get very lucky with a record contract, or in attracting enough interested people to buy a record (painting, or other artwork), or in some other way 'get lucky' enough to support themselves.

    The down side, is that none of these record companies have any interest in making sure the artist makes money. Even if you end-up with a record contract, you can still end-up broke like all of those other musicians we see in those VH-1 documentaries, Dick Dale, and many others.

    This is why I don't buy records or albums from a record store anymore. Not only is there little of interest that I want to hear, but I know for a fact that those musicians aren't receiving much of the money I'd spend on an album anyway. I do wonder what Rob Zombie would have to say on this topic.

    --
    Zhrodague.net - I do projects and stuff too.
  4. Re:And this is news? by init100 · · Score: 3, Informative

    I would only ever go to the piratebay.org for Linux distros (so I can help relieve the mirrors)

    Many, if not most, modern Linux distros use Bittorrent as an offficial distribution method. You can simply go to their main trackers rather than going to The Pirate Bay for Linux distros.

    So that argument is no longer valid.