Judge Lets RIAA Subpoena Defendant's Employer
NewYorkCountryLawyer writes "A judge has ruled that the RIAA can subpoena the defendant's employer in a case pending in Manhattan federal court, Atlantic v. Shutovsky. The judge's order (pdf) contained eight separate rulings deciding 19 pages of discovery disputes (pdf), resolving virtually all of them in favor of the RIAA. Other decisions made include: 'The plaintiffs were permitted to take depositions of Mr. Shutovsky's wife and his brother. Plaintiffs were required to produce all non-privileged documents or materials relating to any investigation and any sound files on their computer, and to produce a privilege log as to any claimed to be privileged. Defendant was required to provide the name and address of each person who used his computer during the three years prior to commencement of the lawsuit.'"
Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
american music connoisseur here, looking for a good proxy server... let the obvious solution to this retarded american legal bullshit commence
dear riaa: the internet was originally designed to route around damage in the event of a nuclear war.
you may consider your legal efforts to be nothing more than damage, to be routed around
feel free to sue somebody about this. because that's obviously the solution to your problems. fucking retards
intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
Wow that is so insightful. Let me guess, you are 16 yo and just read something by Jack Kerouac ?
Ray Beckerman +5 Insightful