IRS Freely Gives Out Employee User Name/Password Info
An anonymous reader writes "The Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration reports that its inspectors were able to get IRS employees to improperly disclose their user names and passwords over 61% of the time. 60,000 of the IRS's 100,000 employees and contractors thus are susceptible to computer hackers, putting personal taxpayer information at risk for unauthorized disclosure, theft and fraud. 'Only eight of the 102 employees contacted either the inspector general's office or IRS security offices to validate the legitimacy of the caller ... The IRS agreed with recommendations from the inspector general that it should take steps to make employees more aware of hacker tactics such as posing as an internal employee and to remind people to report such incidents to security officials.'"
The greatest security measure of all time was probably the Great Wall of China. That got breached by bribing a gate guard (OK, bribing him with his life...).
With all the fancy immobilisers etc, many cars still get ripped off because people leave their doors open or their keys in the lock.
Security in computing etc only changes where the action happens. People still fundamentally operate the same way.
Engineering is the art of compromise.
Not to mention CEOs.
I don't care why you're posting AC
The IRS has 100,000 employees! What a drag on the economomy! Imagine if each one costs $5-10K an average per month in salary, health care, space, pension -- what that all adds up to.
Ron Paul is right, get rid of that juggernaut.
without access to the IRS intranet, I'd say that 99% of those compromised accounts would be useless to someone outside the IRS.
Course, isn't there a statistic floating around that most corporate espionage is done by insiders?
captcha: probed
People need to grow some balls when it comes to these situations. They're afraid of offending the person on the other end, they think they're suggesting that they're liars or frauds. Really, it's just a precaution for your own ass (you'll get fired) and your business (their normal operations can't be disrupted by random people).
Then again, administrators, executives, etc need to be more patient and understanding when what they say is challenged. They can't get an attitude or it will cause people to react by defending their character; i.e. if a less confident individual is accused of incompetence, audacity, or whatever for challenging another, then they will be more likely to feel that it is audacious or incompetent to verify a workplace activity.
Using social engineering to get people to give up their passwords? People were already socially engineered to be susceptible, and afraid. Places of businesses need to have employees treat each other with respect and make it clear to the employees that they have a right to challenge the legitimacy of any workplace situation.
Twinstiq, game news
Is always the most effective way into a 'system'.
---- Booth was a patriot ----
Can you fly a fighter jet? I can't.
He couldn't either before he was trained to. Could you learn to fly a fighter jet? Probably.
As far as his school is concerned, that's just rinding daddy's coattails. And his business deals with Enron and the Rangers shows just the kind of education he received. It's too bad he's not stupid. That would be his only saving grace.
What?
Can you fly a fighter jet? I can't.
I probably can. This means that I could probably get in one, take off, fly in a big circle and possibly land without killing myself (landing's the hard part). If I was rated on a medium sized prop plane, I'd upgrade that to 'definitely'. Still doesn't tell you if I'm at all smart.
"We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
61 / 102 = 59.8%