The New Yorker On Spam
aqk notes an article in the Aug. 6th New Yorker surveying the spam problem up-to-date. The New Yorker may not be exactly the MSM, but it is pretty influential. The author got only one fact wrong that I noticed: Canter and Siegel's seminal spam was propagated through Usenet and not email. Still, it's a good look at the history of spam and the scale of the problem today. The amount of spam that "spam king" Robert Alan Soloway, indicted under the CAN-SPAM Act, is accused of sending over a period of four years is now pumped out about every 30 seconds, around the clock, around the world.
Guess you must be one of them "bloggers" right?
I'm pretty sure the point of your comment is that a Ph.D. is a piece of paper.
The first thing that poppped into my head when I saw the headline was "nerds on fashion".
The New Yorker? Huh??? Methinks there are a few faux nerds reading slashdot. I think that may be a good thing, how about you guys?
-mcgrew
Ph.D. is, specifically, a 'Doctor of Philosophy.' It's a title, like esquire or CMG.
Dude, you need SalesGenie!
Don't worry, he's a friend of mine and we were shooting the breeze. I did bring spam into his awareness, though.
I prefer Flambe as apposed flamebait.