Slashdot Mirror


8 Million Year Old Bacteria Thaws, Lives

Jamie found a New Scientist story about 8 million year old bacteria that scientists thawed out, and now it's alive. Also somehow they are sure that this is safe. The interesting bit is that since these samples came from ancient ice, it seems that the world will naturally be filled with these guys soon.

14 of 345 comments (clear)

  1. Welcome by amigabill · · Score: 5, Funny

    I for one welcome our new microscopic overlords.

    1. Re:Welcome by lonechicken · · Score: 5, Funny

      I for one welcome our new microscopic overlords. You mean "old."
    2. Re:Welcome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      or would that be pre-pwn3d? No, pre-pwn3d is when someone sells you a 3 year old Windows box.
    3. Re:Welcome by bigdavesmith · · Score: 5, Funny

      Not so fast, buddy. This is how it all ends. Global warming causes the ice caps to melt, and it releases that neon-green buggy stuff that only gets active at night, like on that one x-files episode.

      I'm stocking up on flashlight batteries and fuel for the generator.

  2. Typical misleading summary... by daveschroeder · · Score: 5, Interesting
    ...designed to get people up in arms.

    The summary ominously notes:

    [...] somehow they are sure that this is safe. The interesting bit is that since these samples came from ancient ice, it seems that the world will naturally be filled with these guys soon.

    ...filed, of course, under "gonna-need-more-antibiotics".

    Except the article says:

    This is nothing to worry about, say experts, because the process has been going on for billions of years and the bugs are unlikely to cause human disease.

    [...]

    Paul Falkowski of Rutgers University, who led the study, [...] does not believe this is cause for concern because marine bacteria and viruses are typically far less harmful to human health than, for instance, those found on land.

    Russell Vreeland of the Ancient Biomaterials Institute at West Chester University in Pennsylvania, US, agrees. "This has been happening probably for a long, long time. Ice freezes and melts, rocks sink and are eroded. Microbes have been involved with this process for almost 4 billion years," says Vreeland, who has resuscitated 250-million year-old bacteria found in salt crystals. "Earth acts as a gene bank for microbes."


    So, what's "new" here is that a researcher has actually intentionally taken frozen microbes from the oldest known ice and successfully resuscitated them in a laboratory setting. The Earth has been doing this on its own for billions of years.

    I'm sure this comments will be filled with the likes of:

    - By ignoring the undeniable truth that global warming is due to human behavior, we are toying with balances we can't possibly understand, and now may even be releasing ancient microbes into the environment whose dangers we don't yet know!

    - Even if the Earth has been doing this on its own, we are unnaturally accelerating it; therefore, the potential release of these microbes must be bad!

    - This may be a natural process, but humans may not have existed on Earth the last time this occurred, therefore we can't predict the possible harm to humanity!

    ...all tied in, of course, to the fact that we should be working on ways to "stop" climate change, predicated on the belief that any negative climate change is due exclusively to human activity beyond any shadow of scientific doubt, and that no climate change can ever be a net positive, especially when caused by human activity, when there are in truth far more factors involved, even if human activity is a large one. (Note: I am not saying global warming is "positive" or that human activity isn't a component; I am saying that it is inaccurate to cloak anything in self-serving absolutes.)

    The interesting intersection here is that such a transition may occur while humans are present on Earth. This is not necessarily a "good" or a "bad" thing...it just is. Humans have learned to manipulate and adapt to their environment for millennia, both on long and short term bases. Artificial change cannot intrinsically be defined as better or worse than natural change. Some of this change may have a negative impact on human existence on Earth; some may not.

    This does not mean that we should be raping the environment or ignoring any danger. But the single-mindedness of climate change activists is somewhat disturbing. They view climate change in a vacuum, separated from all other concerns, and that is simply a foolish and counterproductive position to take.

    Ever wonder why there are so many global warming deniers? It's because of the attitude taken by fanatic, self-righteous global warming alarmists. We'd be a lot better served by real discussions - which are, unfortunately, far too complex for most people on either side of the "political" global warming debate to understand - than one alarmist global warming story after another.

    The issues - social, economic, scientific, and so on - surrounding "climate change" deserve a far better treatment, even in slashdot comments, than berating Chevy Suburbans, Big Oil, and fat, lazy, greedy Americans.

    1. Re:Typical misleading summary... by UbuntuDupe · · Score: 5, Interesting

      You know what would also help with the problem? If people argued for action on global warming as if it weren't "just another excuse to get the laws we'd want anyway". Maybe if each offered solution didn't specifically target those environmentalists hate without regard to actual environmental damage?

      There's a very simple solution: carbon tax + apply proceeds (in transparent process) to carbon sinks and to legitimate warming harm-abatement.

      That allows everyone to adapt in the least inconvenient way for them. No bureaucracy to decide what uses you "really" need. No bizarre incentive structure that rewards people for being wasteful in the most efficient way possible.

      The "problems" with such a proposal are:

      -It doesn't require visible, vengeance-satisfying sacrifice.
      -Most conspicuous consumption would still happen because rich people would rather pay for the sink/abatement than quit driving the SUV.
      -It would snare the phonies who drive hybrids quite a lot, and not the hated SUV drivers who arrange their lives so that they don't have to drive very far.
      -Most adaptation people make wouldn't be visible and thus wouldn't show how much they "care".
      -Big evil corporations would figure out an efficient carbon sink method (since it's now profitable) and thus get a lot of money.
      -Any result that didn't equate with environmentalists' real goals would be derided as a failure of the system.

      So, the idea doesn't get a lot of play.

    2. Re:Typical misleading summary... by Hardhead_7 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The preponderance of evidence in the 1400's said that the world was flat and that sea monsters ate you if you took your boat too close to the edge.


      No, that was the popular opinion. In the 1400s, most scientists believed the Earth was round. I think you unintentionally drew a parallel.
  3. Summary dies, needs resusitation. by lottameez · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Seriously, that was a terrible summary. The reason the scientists think it's okay and not dangerous is because the process of old ice melting and bacteria being reintroduced happens all the time.

    Nothing to see here, move along.

    --
    Yeah? Well I think you're overrated too.
  4. truly amazing by JeanBaptiste · · Score: 5, Funny

    you typed all that in under 4 minutes. (story posted at 11:01, comment posted at 11:05)

    want to document my code for me? shouldn't take you long

    1. Re:truly amazing by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 5, Funny

      /*
      you typed all that in under 4 minutes. (story posted at 11:01, comment posted at 11:05)
      want to document my code for me? shouldn't take you long
      */
      You're right- that was fast!

    2. Re:truly amazing by djupedal · · Score: 5, Funny

      Remember - subscribers can see articles in the future. What seemed like 4 minutes to your disconnected asse was actually 2 hours to his connected asse.

      Ok, everyone laugh and point at #537955 so he can complete his initiation and we can move on to the next chodderhead.

  5. Lawyers? by iknownuttin · · Score: 5, Funny
    The Bacteria, named Cirroc, have said that they plan to attend law school and embark on a new career as a personal injury lawyer.

    The article said they were parasitic bacteria?

    --
    I prefer Flambe as apposed flamebait.
  6. Wrong Focus by GodfatherofSoul · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I think posters are getting too hung up on the "prehistoric killer bacteria" story and not the fact that something frozen for 8 million years can be thawed and live again (not sure how new this news is). So, we could potentially have a solar system filled with seeder asteroids (meteoroids?) from massive impacts with Earth or an older life-bearing Mars.

    --
    I swear to God...I swear to God! That is NOT how you treat your human!
  7. Re:You're right by pohl · · Score: 5, Funny

    Exactly, because no point is ever valid if it came from an asshole.

    Sorry, just joining the dogpile.

    --

    The "cue the foo posts in 3, 2, 1..." posts will commence with no subsequent foo posts in 3, 2, 1...