Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Algorithm Seamlessly Patches Holes In Images

Posted by kdawson on from the mind-the-gap dept.

Beetle B. writes in with research from Carnegie Mellon demonstrating a new way to replace arbitrarily shaped blank areas in an image with portions of images from a huge catalog in a totally seamless manner. From the abstract: "In this paper we present a new image completion algorithm powered by a huge database of photographs gathered from the Web. The algorithm patches up holes in images by finding similar image regions in the database that are not only seamless but also semantically valid. Our chief insight is that while the space of images is effectively infinite, the space of semantically differentiable scenes is actually not that large. For many image completion tasks we are able to find similar scenes which contain image fragments that will convincingly complete the image. Our algorithm is entirely data-driven, requiring no annotations or labelling by the user."

21 of 198 comments (clear)

  1. Finally... by setirw · · Score: 5, Funny

    Uncensored Japanese pornography!

    --
    This message printed on 100% post-consumer recycled electrons.
    1. Re:Finally... by funkatron · · Score: 3, Funny

      The entire internet outside slashdot

      --
      "Welcome to our world. We are the wasted youth. And we are the future too." Yes, I know these are stupid lyrics.
    2. Re:Finally... by SnarfQuest · · Score: 3, Funny

      Take one of those celebrity nude photos with pixelated parts, cut out the pixelated parts, then run this on them.

      You get photos of the celebrities, wearing japanese clothing!

      --
      Who would win this election: Andrew Weiner vs Andrew Weiner's weiner.
    3. Re:Finally... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      You've probably already got a processor which can erase a woman's clothes, in real time no less. The male human brain and eye are designed for it.

    4. Re:Finally... by voxel · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'd go more like this:

      You take a picture of that cute girl at the coffee shop. Snap her with the camera phone, erase all those pesky clothes, and let the algorithm do its thing.

      You wait for the algorithm to finish, it says "Done", you get all excited and click the button to see the result, and.... * DOH *, it put all her clothes back on, albeit a different color and style.

      --
      Modesty is one of life's greatest attributes
    5. Re:Finally... by mikael · · Score: 3, Funny

      Nothing for you to see here - please move along!

      ?

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    6. Re:Finally... by maxwell+demon · · Score: 2, Funny

      It was cut out and a text version of this program automatically replaced it by a "make people nude" comment.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    7. Re:Finally... by stuktongue · · Score: 2, Funny

      ... content which can be used to fill the holes.

      I got your content right here!

  2. w00t! by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 5, Funny

    It was as if a million fake celebrity pr0n websites cried and were suddenly silenced...

    --
    My blog
  3. What will it do if... by iknownuttin · · Score: 5, Funny

    I take a picture of a hole?

    --
    I prefer Flambe as apposed flamebait.
    1. Re:What will it do if... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      It will insert two hands, gripping the sides.

  4. DO NOT use it on your Porn-Collection! by Opportunist · · Score: 5, Funny

    You never know what that "kinda-like" picture used to patch contains. You might get the opposite of what you want.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  5. pfft by Shadow+Wrought · · Score: 5, Funny

    CSI Miami and NY have had infinite zoom capability with photos for years, and you excited about this? Bah.

    --
    If brevity is the soul of wit, then how does one explain Twitter?
  6. Dear entrants of the Fark Photoshop contest: by circletimessquare · · Score: 3, Funny

    Due to recent advances at Carengie Mellon, you have all been made redundant by a computer algorithm. Sorry, progress is a biatch.

    Yours,
    some code and a database

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  7. Will it be as smart of MS Word? by elrous0 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Instead of "You appear to be writing a letter. Should I format it for you?" I guess we'll get "You appear to be viewing Japanese pornography. Should I de-pixelate it for you?"

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    1. Re:Will it be as smart of MS Word? by somersault · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'm going to have to take out trademark and patent on Clitty, your helpful little hentai fixing friend!

      --
      which is totally what she said
    2. Re:Will it be as smart of MS Word? by boyko.at.netqos · · Score: 3, Funny

      That is simultaneously the most brilliant and stupid thing I've read on Slashdot.

      --
      I used to work for NetQoS. I no longer do, but want to keep the excellent karma attached to this account.
  8. Replaced with by sjaguar · · Score: 3, Funny

    "this section has been intentionally left blank"

    --
    If at first you don't succeed, call it version 1.0.
  9. Re:Howabout... by Opportunist · · Score: 2, Funny

    Depends, will they have access to all the pics the NSA gathers from people travelling in and out of the US?

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  10. Now we need a patch for dead servers by objekt · · Score: 4, Funny

    We need a new way to replace slashdotted servers with portions of articles from a huge catalog in a totally seamless manner.

    --
    -- Boycott Shell
  11. Re:Faces by dintech · · Score: 2, Funny

    I want a picture of me with no face, and see what face it gives me! (c'mon clint eastwood)

    My bet is on Nicholas Cage or John Travolta.