Slashdot Mirror


Federal Anti-Obscenity Program Comes Up Limp

kotj.mf writes "The New York Times reports that the Federally funded anti-Web pornography campaign run by Morality in Media, a conservative religious group, has yet to result a single prosecution for obscenity, despite having generated more than 67,000 citizen complaints. The group, better known for its campaign to have Cosmopolitan removed from supermarket checkout stands, is pushing the Justice Department to more aggressively pursue cases against what it sees as 'a prime threat to society, the growth on the Internet of sexual material involving consenting adults.'"

11 of 321 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Federal Anti-Obscenity Program ? by PopeRatzo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Federally funded anti-Web pornography campaign run by Morality in Media, a conservative religious group
    Read that over a few times. If it doesn't make your skin crawl, then you really need to read up on your Constitution and maybe a few articles by some Founding Fathers.
    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  2. So much idiocy, so little time... by PontifexPrimus · · Score: 4, Insightful
    The article is so full of I-want-to-bash-my-head-against-the-wall idiotic ideas that I really don't know where to start.
    So I'll just pick one tiny quote:

    Would-be complainants are also advised not to trawl for obscene Web sites, noting that "men are particularly vulnerable to pornographic addiction." Identifying Internet smut, the site advises, is best left to professional law enforcement personnel.
    Who have to be blind, deaf eunuchs. Because that's the only way to be sure. Dammit, I have to add one thing:

    Mr. Peters said he was confident that officials would eventually assume their responsibility and go after what he described as a prime threat to society, the growth on the Internet of sexual material involving consenting adults.
    Ok... what exactly is wrong with consenting adults??? How can you get any more puritan than that? Is he really that much out of touch with reality that he can even begin to think that there's anything wrong with that and furthermore, that HE SHOULD BE ALLOWED TO DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT???
    Ahemm... sorry, but the degree of mental retardation needed to keep such views in today's society keeps astounding me.
    --
    -- Language is a virus from outer space.
  3. Re:Federal Anti-Obscenity Program ? by sizzzzlerz · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Have you been asleep for the last 6-1/2 years?

    When the decider's attitude is that the Constitution is just a damn piece of paper, why should something like this surprise anybody. Compared to his other desecrations of that document, this is nothing.

  4. Re:Federally Funded?? by spikedvodka · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Hrm... can anybody find more information about this program, I'm thinking it's write my congress-critter time again, because this is crazy. a funding number, anything? /me goes to find an old American history textbook, photocopies the constitution, laminates it, and places it in a UV-Protected, inert atmosphere environment. Might just be the last copy we see.

    --
    I will not give in to the terrorists. I will not become fearful.
  5. Pass the buck by poptones · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Look: the SOB said, BEFORE HE WAS EVEN ELECTED THE FIRST TIME, "what this country needs is a little less free speech."

    He said this. Openly, in response to attack ads against him. He told everyone where he stood before he even had the chance to govern.

    And then these IDIOTS elected him.

    Twice.

    So whose fault is it that the Constitution is a forgotten document? Our schools are failing us - have been for years. And that ain't shrub's fault. I cannot stand the guy - I personally think he is a traitor to the US Constitution. But it's not like no one knew where he stood. The fact he could even have been elected is a sign of deeper illness in our nation, and we serve no good by blaming everything upon the latest symptom of this disease.

    1. Re:Pass the buck by howlingmadhowie · · Score: 5, Insightful

      oh, but there's enough evidence to call you spineless cowards for not doing anything about it.

    2. Re:Pass the buck by PopeRatzo · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I think it's all more complicated than you guys are making out.

      In the US, the very fabric of the reality we perceive as citizens is corrupted by a complicit media that supports authoritarian mercantilism, by presenting "news" that consists of dire problems over which none of us can possibly have any control or influence. It puts the voting population into a level of anxiety where all they want is a big, tough daddy who will keep the (mostly imaginary) wolves away from the door.

      Anything remotely like a discussion of issues that are important to our lives is immediately obscured by talking about one side being "corrupt" or one side being "cowardly". Even the notion that every issue has "two sides" is a huge canard, which serves to make everything into a simplified binary boxing match. Any discussion between two politicians or two opinions is "scored" by talking about who is "on defense" and who is "on offense".

      In other words, we are being fed a steady diet of bullshit, intended to keep all of us as far away from any active involvement in our own governance. In this way, the ruling class of America, the rich, the powerful, the members of the "families", the "insiders" manage to keep us safely out of the way so they can create and manage a system where they can have their own sweet way.

      Think about this: A President and Vice-President are elected. The President is from a family whose wealth comes primarily from the oil business and the Vice President is the CEO of a corporation that does (among many other things) large-scale operations of the oil business. Within months of the election of this administration, we invade a country that happens to have one of the largest oil reserves on the planet. Within a few years, the entire war is being managed by the very same corporation that the Vice President was the Chief Executive Officer for, from providing food and laundry services for soldiers to transportation services to security and management of (naturally) those huge oil reserves. For the next several years, while the war escalates, the oil industry shows record profits at a level never before seen.

      If you happen to speak to a member of the news media or any other "opinion leader" such as the many establishment political bloggers, and you simply mention the fact that 1) two oil men get elected to the White House, 2) they start a war in the country with massive oil reserves, and 3) the industry from which they come shows the greatest profits ever seen in the history of mankind, those establishment "opinion leaders" will look at you like you must be some sort of tin-foil hat wearing conspiracy nut for simply stating a few basic facts.

      My main point is that even with the above set of facts, even though you'd expect a vigilant news media to be screaming their bloody heads off over the fact that something has happened in this country that you would barely believe possible in some tin-pot dictatorship, this "fourth estate" completely ignores the entire issue. Afraid to be called "the liberal media" by a bunch of bullies that have planned for years to destroy any semblance of an independent journalist class, the media, completely cowed, simply looks away. In shame over their complicity in this horror-show, they turn the entire experience into a political tit-for-tat where there are "two sides", equal in every way. They try to tell us that the Truth lives in some fictitious "middle ground" that has never existed.

      Finally, before we start to assign blame to lazy Americans who voted for Bush even though they knew he was a two-bit tough-guy who would give our country away to corporate interest while stomping all over the Constitution, we should remember that staying on top of what's really going on in our government is practically a full-time job and most of us are just trying to get from one day to the next without losing our homes or our shirts. An economic reality created, by the way, by the very powers who are trying to keep us out of their

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
  6. Re:Contemporary community standards by Alchemar · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If it only offends a small subset of the community, who could it violate community standards? If that many people are looking at this stuff, then by definition it is no longer obsene.

  7. Consentual sex is a problem now?? by Jugalator · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What's the problem with sex among consentual adults?

    It's the non-consentual sex they should be worried about.

    --
    Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
  8. Root Causes. by headkase · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Puritanism (v.): The overwhelming fear that someone, somewhere, is having a good time.
    Really, just because they feel guilty over any pleasure (because we were bad and got kicked out of the garden of eden so we don't deserve them in the eyes of god or something like that) doesn't mean that every pleasure should be struck from acceptable social behavior especially when they really are a vocal minority.

    --
    Shh.
  9. A small solution by an.echte.trilingue · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Well, it is a couple of months until we hit the ballot boxes, but in the mean time, this is how I voiced my discontent:
    1. Go to the complaint submission site and submit a complaint.
    2. Put the url obscenitycrimes.org in the Report URL box.
    3. Under the "type of obscenity" check box, check "other" and place this text in the description box: "Obscene waste of my tax dollars and obscene violation of the first amendment
    I know that it won't do anything, but it makes me feel a little better anyway.
    --
    weirdest thing I ever saw: scientology advertising on slashdot.