Slashdot Mirror


VMware May Violate Linux Copyrights

Nailer writes "Bloomberg believe VMware's IPO today may the largest technology offering since Google. But doubts have been cast over the company's supposedly proprietary ESX product, as top 10 Linux contributor Christopher Hellwig claims the software may violate Linux kernel copyrights. 'Is Hellwig right, and is VMware a derived product of Linux? Unless vmkernel can be loaded without the Linux kernel, it would appear so. VMware was developed from another, long ago OS created as a research project, but it's unclear whether vmkernel was ported from that OS or rewritten as the Linux-requiring binary blob. What's more of an issue is that VMware had these serious questions posed directly to them a year ago, repeated in a public forum many times since, but have yet to respond at all.'"

8 of 443 comments (clear)

  1. Re:They made a movie about this with Charlie Sheen by MouseR · · Score: 5, Funny

    Your plan is missing a very important and crucial step:

      ?????

  2. Service Console can be replaced by kerubi · · Score: 3, Funny

    You heard it here first. In the next major ESX release, VMware will ditch the Linux service console altogether in favour of their own proprietary one. Admins around the globe cheer as they have to learn yet another system.

    --
    I joined two users too late.
  3. lucky bastards! by roscocoltran · · Score: 3, Funny

    I've read somewhere that SCO was offering a special discount on linux licenses this week. Quick! get one before the offer ends!

  4. Re:Incorrect wording in title by LeafOnTheWind · · Score: 2, Funny

    Just because Linux programmers don't get paid, you think it's OK to violate them?! You insensitive clod!

  5. Re:Incorrect wording in title by gstoddart · · Score: 5, Funny

    Copyright gets infringed, licenses get violated.

    Copyright gets extended, we all get violated. :-P

    Cheers
    --
    Lost at C:>. Found at C.
  6. Virtual PC; When Security Doesn't Matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Mod the parent up. Clearly Microsoft Virtual PC is superior than VMWare in that it allows for significantly greater functionality such as allowing a 'guest' to execute arbitrary code on the 'host' or other 'guests'. Clearly VMWare is inferior in this aspect and we're all fools for not using another manifestation of 'Trustworthy Computing' from Microsoft. Hey, not to mention, VMWare doesn't run on Linux either...er...yes it does.

    MS07-049:
    http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/Bulletin /MS07-049.mspx

    From the advisory:
    "An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in Microsoft Virtual PC and Microsoft Virtual Server that could allow a user with administrator permissions to the guest operating system to run code on the host operating system or other guest operating systems. An attacker with administrator permissions to the guest operating system, could exploit the vulnerability by running specially crafted code on the guest operating system. This could result in a heap overflow on the host or other guest operating systems. An attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability could take complete control of an affected system."

  7. I'm sure by Capt+James+McCarthy · · Score: 2, Funny

    This can be quickly resolved with some stock....

    --
    There are no loopholes. It's either legal or it's not.
  8. With apologies to Linus Torvalds: by chris_mahan · · Score: 2, Funny

    ESX is like free software, it's better when it's free.

    --

    "Piter, too, is dead."