Slashdot Mirror


Netflix Makes It Easy To Reach a Human

msblack writes "In a move that goes against the prevailing trends of outsourcing and non-interactive customer support, Netflix has forsaken e-mail as a means of resolving customer problems. According to the NYTimes article, Netflix set up a call center in Portland OR, shunning other popular US call center cities (because Portland natives were perceived to sound friendlier) or off-shoring. 'It's very interesting and counter to everything anybody else is doing,' said Tom Adams, a market researcher in Carmel, California. 'Everyone else is making it almost impossible to find a human.'"

31 of 277 comments (clear)

  1. Call center in Oregon... by thatskinnyguy · · Score: 3, Informative

    AMAZING! In all likelihood, English was their first language too! I think I'm going to break-down and cry from all this excitement.

    --
    The game.
    1. Re:Call center in Oregon... by jgarra23 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      English was their first language too!
      Mod parent up, I totally understand this problem. Why on earth companies that cater to a predominantly English speaking country off-shore their support to ESL countries where the people that can read & speak English DO NOT understand the vernacular, expressions, idioms and vocal inflexions are driving me nuts. How many companies do I have to put on a list to avoid because I just couldn't understand the person on the other end of the phone because:

      1. They are ESL
      2. They are reading exclusively from a script
      3. The connection is so bad it sounds like we're both under water.

      Just like if I were in France, I would expect a French speaking CSR...

    2. Re:Call center in Oregon... by Wolfrider · · Score: 4, Insightful

      --You know, stuff like this actually makes me want to go out of my way to *support* NetFlix -- for doing the Right Thing(TM) for their CUSTOMERS.
       
      // Hates outsourcing with Teh Very Core of my Being

      --
      .
      == WolfriderV6 == I'm willing to admit that *I just might* be wrong... Are you??
    3. Re:Call center in Oregon... by vigmeister · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Why on earth companies that cater to a predominantly English speaking country off-shore their support to ESL countries where the people that can read & speak English DO NOT understand the vernacular, expressions, idioms and vocal inflexions are driving me nuts Assume for a second you are from Texas. I'd say that a rep in Portland would have trouble understanding your accent if you have thick southern drawl.

      Or you can try ordering a 'pie' from a pizza place in Valdosta, GA.

      1. They are ESL That should not have a bearing on the issue. Although I am from India (and ESL country)english was the first language I learnt. My spoken english is quite good and most people I meet are surprised that I "don't have an accent". I am not an exception and I know several Indian/Chinese/European people who all speak excellent english. In fact, one of my english teachers at GT was german. Problem, however, is that the people smart enough and capable of speaking good english usually don't end up working in call centers. The fault lies with the hiring process and not the outsourcing itself.

      2. They are reading exclusively from a script Again, they hire the wrong people.

      3. The connection is so bad it sounds like we're both under water. They are skimping on the mechanism. Nothing to do with the fact that the reps are from ESL countries.

      I daresay that these companies can hire better employees, improve connection of the call and still come out ahead if they outsource. It's the implementation that is at fault - not the principle.

      Cheers!
      --
      Atheist: Buddhist in a Prius
    4. Re:Call center in Oregon... by vigmeister · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I think there's a middle ground between your comments and mine though thank you for expanding, I didn't have time to better articulate my issues. I agree with your issues having faced them myself. I have better luck with Indian reps because I am familiar with 'Indian English' :)

      I'm sure the people in the Indian call centers are doing a fine job with what they have & I certainly don't fault them Amex hires some good cutomer reps in India. They tell you their real name and don't hide their accent. They also communicate extremely well. However, this is an exception to the rule since most Indian cost centers focus so much on saving money that they hire incompetent and unskilled people for a pittance.

      They're just trying to make a living however the limitations I mentioned do exist and there's not really much at presence to do with it. Don't quite follow this last sentence (maybe becasue I am Indian ;) )

      I am not denying the limitations and to put it in less diplomatic terms, Indian call centers are crappy. But I am fairly sure that the source of the problem is not the fact that it is Indian, but rather the fact that the companies are cutting costs to the point where the quality of service is atrocious. If they spent a bit more money, they could hire better employees and have more stable and clear connections to India. The companies provide us with the least level of quality that we will put up with, so some of the blame lies with us for not complaining or objecing to their service.

      I ntoday's society I find a lot of people clubbing their objection to outsourcing and the quality of service to strengthen their argument against the low quality call centers in India. I think these are separate issues. I will accept that it would be easier for me to bitch about Indian call centers. If you do it, people might misconstrue it as an argument against outsourcing or xenophobia. If I do it, they take my argument at face value.

      Cheers!

      --
      Atheist: Buddhist in a Prius
    5. Re:Call center in Oregon... by vigmeister · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I do happen to be from Texas. There's nothing about a southern drawl that is unintelligible. I am fairly good with accents and to me, the southern drawl is not an issue. However, I know several people who DO have a problem with understanding various accents within the US including the southern drawl, the NY talk and ebonics. There is nothing about the indian accent that is unintelligible either.

      In all of the times I've called customer support (both domestic centers and outsourced) I've never had anyone not understand what I was saying. I've had more difficulty understanding them. Not insinuating anything, but if they understand what you are saying and you can't communicate back, there is still some ambiguity as to which one of you lacks the ability to communicate or whether it is a problem with the connection.

      And while it's great for you that you happened to learn English as your first language, that doesn't automatically mean that we can assume the entire nation of India speaks perfectly fluent English. It's only common sense to assume that if the hiring pool is in a nation where the majority of citizens don't learn English as their first language, then the majority of hires will speak limited English. Then I guess it is also common sense to assume that if the hiring pool for a hospital is in a nation where the majority of citizens don't have degrees in medicine, then the majority of hires will have limited medical skills?

      Additionally, whether you learn a language as a first language or a second language is irrelevant to your skills in that language. I am better at understanding and communicating in my fifth language (Hindi) than several native speakers of the same due to better communication skills. When you learn a language is not so important as linguistic and communicative abilities.

      You seem to have an acute case of closed-mindedness. It was ignorant of you to make such a statement about the fine people of Texas Having a thick southern drawl is not a negative thing. In fact, it is helpful in the south to communicate better. It might be the portland hire's inability to bridge the gap. Point is that the difference between a NY accent and the southern drawl (which I semi-consciously find to be a mark of politeness) is no different from the differences between a Texan and a well educated Indian.

      and it was also ignorant of you to assume that you, with your fortunate upbringing, represent the whole, or even the majority of citizens of "ESL" nations. My upbringing was not especially fortunate. My parents spoke 3 languages at home and they just picked one to teach me. I picked up the other two as well and was very comfortable using them. I am by no means an exception like I said, a good portion of India's urban population have kids speaking english by the time the kids are in kindergarten. Regardless, it doesn't matter as long as peolpe like me DO exist and CAN be hired as opposed to dimwits who can't communicate.

      Cheers!
      --
      Atheist: Buddhist in a Prius
    6. Re:Call center in Oregon... by plague3106 · · Score: 4, Informative

      I am fairly good with accents and to me, the southern drawl is not an issue. However, I know several people who DO have a problem with understanding various accents within the US including the southern drawl, the NY talk and ebonics. There is nothing about the indian accent that is unintelligible either.

      Southern accents have never been an issue for me either, but more often than not Indian accents are. The problem is that the Indian accent is so think it IS unintelligible. I don't think you're a good judge of that because you were raised in India and were exposed to it growing up. Most people in the US aren't exposed to thick Indian accents on English speech, and for us it IS very hard to understand.

      Even some of the Indians I've worked with I've had to really concentrate to work through the accent. Others have had less of an accent, probably because they've been here for quite a while.

    7. Re:Call center in Oregon... by CmdrGravy · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Well said, I have had numerous bad experiences with call centres and regardless of where the staff are actually located the same factors come into play which determine the quality of the service you recieve.

      Any company intending to set up a call centre needs to make the following decisions

      1) Do I employ people who understand the business we're engaged in or the cheapest person we can find.

      2) Do we allow the staff to use their own initative when speaking to the customers and rely on their knowledge of the businesss or do with give the cheapest people we could find a script

      3) Do allow our staff to take as long as is necessary, including time after the call has finished ( to update records of conversation, make enquiries etc ) to resolve the problem or do we assume that all problems can be fixed in 2.35 minutes and 10 seconds is plenty of time to get ready for the next call

      4) Do we reward those staff who help our customers most and learn from their techniques or do we reward those staff who have the most calls

      5) Do we expose our staff to the other departments in our business so they gain an understanding of them and build relationships with people there who can sort out customers problems or do we keep them locked in a basement and communicate to them in barked commands

      6) Do we allow our staff the leeway to take decisions as to how to deal with a problem and provide a good resolution for the customer or do we encourage them to concede no ground, admit no failure and re-route the call to random departments or drop it when the heat goes up

      Those places which make the right decisions may cost more to run but from a customers point of view are vastly preferable to deal with. Since a call centre is now probably my only exposure to any particular company ( apart from the actual service or whatever they're providing me ) then the performance of that call centre is a very important factor in choosing where to do business. It's nice that people are finally starting to realise that.

    8. Re:Call center in Oregon... by Phroggy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      No, I really don't like outsourcing customer service, even when it's within the same country. If I have a problem with a particular company, I want to talk to someone who works there! Is that really too much to ask?

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
  2. Phew... by vigmeister · · Score: 4, Funny

    Atleast with a call center in portland, the deception doesn't start when the rep says "My name is George"

    Cheers!

    --
    Atheist: Buddhist in a Prius
    1. Re:Phew... by vigmeister · · Score: 5, Funny

      Last time I called Sprint (I usually email, but I needed somethign ASAP) I got this female on the line who said her name was Michelle. She was very obviously Indian trying to put on an american accent by not rolling her 'r's and with less "clicking" of her 't's and 'd's. I went ahead and gave her my information. The moment she saw my name was clearly Indian, she dropped all pretences of an accent.

      The other time I had fun was when I got this rep (don't remember what it was for) who put me on hold, but forgot to mute and I heard him talking to his buddies in Hindi. I went ahead and asked him if he was talking in Hindi and he panicked and said in his strongest Indian accent, "No sir, that must have been some disturbance on the line. We are located in Washington". I still find it funny that he felt the need to tell me where their call center was :))

      Cheers!

      --
      Atheist: Buddhist in a Prius
    2. Re:Phew... by vigmeister · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Amex is a good example of outsourcing. Their reps tell you their real names and don't hide their accents (most of them speak very good english and their accents are close to RP). I was making small talk with this rep while the 'computer was processing' and he cheerfully told me he was in Bombay and we talked a little bit about their then recent floods. He explicitly told me that he was required to speak in english to avoid any potential issues.

      Cheers!

      --
      Atheist: Buddhist in a Prius
  3. Why not both? by UbuntuDupe · · Score: 4, Insightful

    While it's great to be able to reach a human, sometimes you have a simple question, or a complicated one with a simple solution, such that email is a lot more time efficient. I've had a problem with Sprint billing and their customer service part of the site doesn't give an email, so I have to call in and be put on hold for 30 minutes, authenticate myself, and get shuffled around through several departments, just to be able to communicate the existence of a problem. On the other hand, with Vanguard (investments) you can both call and email, and this has saved me a lot of time, for example, when I have a question that doesn't need to be answered immediately. I just send it, and pick up the answer at my convenience. (Thought it's not "email" per se, but a messaging form after you log in.)

  4. Good news! by loony · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Good enough for me - I just signed up. People always complain that everybody is outsourcing and service is bad and all. Well, here is your chance to put your money where your mouth is. I know I just did.

    Peter.

  5. Wow, cool... um, can I have my email back? by Applekid · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's nice that there's a call option that's home-grown, and there isn't a push for using the web/email for customer service, and all... but, did they have to cut e-mail out of the loop altogether?

    DVDs by mail isn't such a big hairy deal that I need to jump on the phone and hold for who knows how long to express that I never got a disc that was sent when I can just shoot off an email saying "It's been a week, the disc you sent never got here, could you try again?" and forget about it.

    (Partial disclosure: I am not a Netflix subscriber, but of another DVD-by-mail rental company (Full disclosure: Greencine) and never had any problems using e-mail only, although I think they've got an 1-800 number, too.)

    --
    More Twoson than Cupertino
    1. Re:Wow, cool... um, can I have my email back? by elrous0 · · Score: 4, Informative

      I believe they still have the "Report a problem with this disc" option in the queue, where you can notify them if you haven't received a disc (or it was damaged) with just a couple of clicks. I used it before when I received one that was damaged.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  6. Yet another way Netflix is superior to Blockbuster by elrous0 · · Score: 5, Informative
    I used to be on Netflix years ago, when they first got started. But I left when they started the subscription model and started throttling.

    But a few months ago, I decided to get back into it. At the time, I decided to try out both Blockbuster and Netflix at the same time, just to see how they stacked up. In the end, there was no comparison. Blockbuster's only advantage was their store exchange feature (where you can return your rental in a store and pick out a new DVD from the store). But it was completely outweighed by the terrible quality of every other aspect of their service.

    Blockbuster was SLOW. Netflix, for me has a two day turnaround--I drop a DVD in the mail and 2 days later a new one. Blockbuster's turnaround was several days at best, much longer at worst.

    Blockbuster's queue system is weak. It's nowhere nearly as sophisticated as Netflix's. Moving things around in Blockbuster's queue is a pain and it lacks features like getting a summary of the movie just by hovering your cursor over it and dragging-and-dropping movies to change their order.

    Blockbuster's selection is a JOKE compared to Netflix. This is especially important to me as an indie film fan.

    Blockbuster throttled me almost from day one. Movies would sit at the top of my queue with "Available" status, yet they would ship out a movie that was 6th on my list, and it would take them several days to do even THAT.

    To me, this news of better customer service is just another way that Netflix shows that they've really got their stuff together. Blockbuster may have the store model down, but their online store leaves MUCH to be desired.

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  7. Huh? by Billosaur · · Score: 4, Funny

    According to the NYTimes article, Netflix set up the call center in Portland OR, shunning other popular US call center cities (because Portland natives were perceived to sound friendlier)

    What the f**k?!?! Are they tryin' to say people in New Jersey aren't f**kin' friendly enough?!?!? Freakin' lunatics... them and their weepy northwestern friends. Jersey doesn't need you or your stinkin' movies...

    --
    GetOuttaMySpace - The Anti-Social Network
    1. Re:Huh? by elrous0 · · Score: 5, Funny

      John Waters used to do a stand-up routine where he would talk about the funny stuff he overheard in Baltimore. One of my favorite ones was one he overheard in a grocery store one day. He was standing behind a family in line and the little son turns to the Dad and says "Dad, why is mommy crying?" to which the father replies "Because you're a little asshole!"

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  8. Answers by COMON$ · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You know, I really don't care if I reach a voice, I just want my questions answered. There are situations where I prefer a computer answering, Airborne package pickup comes to mind. As for customer service I am happier to have a live chat with the rep as anything. I get a person (albeit they are multitasking) fairly quickly and there are no misunderstandings as the text is right in front of you. When I am done I get a transcript to file away in case I want to look at it again. Talking on the phone just takes way to long most of the time and I dont feel like I get as good of expertise on the first try as I do chat anyway.

    --
    CS: It is all sink or swim...oh and did I mention there are sharks in that water?
  9. Not entirely the situation.... by PlatyPaul · · Score: 5, Informative

    One important point which is ignored in TFA is that the use of simple to-the-point web forms for common issues (such as lost/damaged discs, excessive delays, or incorrect mailings) means that the typical user never has to call or email in the first place. Unlike a lot of other websites, these forms actually don't suck, either. In case you're a user and haven't found them yet, they're all accessible off of your account page.

    Also, Netflix users frequently receive emails which are "checking up" on movie arrival times in order to provide an accurate estimate of when shipped discs will arrive. Having changed addresses twice with our family account, my wife and I have been very grateful for this "getting things right" mentality.

    --
    Misery loves company. Online misery loves unsuspecting random strangers.
  10. Wait Time? by Tiberius_Fel · · Score: 3, Insightful

    They're not doing themselves any favours if the call centre has a huge wait time. At least with e-mail you can send the e-mail and wait for a response, as opposed to sitting there with the phone playing bad hold music on speakerphone or while you hold it in your hand. Though it's nice that they are using (relatively) local reps who no doubt speak English... it's not very helpful if you can't get to one in a reasonable amount of time.

    --
    Join the Empire! http://www.empirereborn.net/
  11. On a slightly offtopic note... by packetmon · · Score: 4, Funny

    I recently had to call NYPD to find out something about a ticket. So I dialed the local precint... To my amusement (not kidding):

    Thank you for calling yadda yadda...
    For homicide press 1
    For a detective press 2
    For donut squad press 3

    Alright, so I made up donut squad... But it was funny yet a little scary to think that automation is going a little too far sometimes. I tried to call my mother recently and got the same thing:

    Thank you for calling your mother...
    If you need money press 1
    If you need your laundry done, press 2
    If its mother's day, press 3

    1. Re:On a slightly offtopic note... by UbuntuDupe · · Score: 4, Funny

      If you need me to stop renting out your old bedroom because you lost your job again, press 4 ;-)

  12. What exactly DO people talk to Netflix about? by RudeIota · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Good for Netflix, but after being a Netflix customer for a few years, I've never had to contact customer support.

    And that, my friends, is probably the best 'customer support' of all.

    --
    Fact: Everything I say is fiction.
  13. Friendly, indeed by Otter · · Score: 4, Insightful
    (because Portland natives were perceived to sound friendlier)

    As long as you don't mention you're a Californian!

  14. Re:Yet another way Netflix is superior to Blockbus by Belial6 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I still don't buy the 'throttling' rumors. When it was a big deal, I looked all over for some indication that Netflix was throttling delivery. I never found any. People would point to the Netflix terms of use as 'proof' that they admit to 'throttling'. There was never anything I found in their TOS that said they throttled. When people would explain what was happening to them, it always turned out that they just didn't get the movie that was a new release and at the top of their list.

    I know that Netflix has rarely taken more than 1 day to receive my movies, and 1 day to get me a new one. This has been the case the entire time I have had Netflix, and I watch a LOT of movies. In fact, I usually go through about 30 movies a month on my three movie plan.

    I think that part of the problem is that people get confused about what 'throttling' is. I know that Gamefly throttles. Throttling would be holding back deliveries. If Netflix sends you the second or third movie on your list because they don't have enough of the new release, and they give first priority to those that rent less, that is NOT throttling. In fact, doing the opposite would be throttling. If Young Sebastian only has one item on his list, and Ms. Black has 50, and there is only one copy of "Blades of Glory" left to send out. Sending it to Ms. Black would mean that Young Sebastian would be 'throttled', where as sending it to Ms. Black would mean that both people get a movie.

  15. Another point to Netflix: by Kadin2048 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    --You know, stuff like this actually makes me want to go out of my way to *support* NetFlix -- for doing the Right Thing(TM) for their CUSTOMERS. Definitely; I'm proud to be a Netflix customer and happy to recommend them to anyone.

    Another thing they did recently ... they reduced their prices. Sent me a letter in the mail, said 'hey, the plan you're on is now $14.95/mo instead of $19.95, congrats.'

    I was really surprised. Most companies I would have expected to just bump me up one level of service (to the 4-at-a-time plan or something) while keeping me at the same price level, making me call them up to downgrade to my old level of service in order to save money. They didn't; they just dropped the price, and I didn't have to do a thing.

    It's a little ridiculous that I get surprised by a company doing what ought to be the right and obvious thing, but that's how things work these days. Anyway, kudos to Netflix and whoever is in charge there. Hope they can keep it up.
    --
    "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    1. Re:Another point to Netflix: by Uncle+Rummy · · Score: 4, Informative

      Netflix didn't drop their prices to do "the right and obvious thing", they did it in response to increasing competition from Blockbuster.

  16. Re:Your response is pretty dodgy by vigmeister · · Score: 3, Interesting

    He said "They are ESL."

    You said "That should not have a bearing on the issue. Although I am from India (and ESL country)english was the first language I learnt."

    Then you're not ESL, are you? His earlier statements regarding ESL countries was what I was going for. There are several non-ESL people in ESL countries.

    And on the gripping hand, you said "learnt" which is almost certainly a UK idiom, even tho used over here once in a while. You mean a UK variant? 'learnt' is not an idiom.

    None of what you said has much at all to do with his primary big picture complaint, that offshoring to ESL countries is a bad idea. All you have really done is dodged his compalints with hand waving. If you had some bacon, you'd have bacon and eggs, if you had some eggs.
    Next time, try answering his hig picture complaint. Convenient snippage here. Offshoring to ESL countries is not a bad idea. As long as you hire the right people and don't go overboard with cost cutting, you can still save some money without compromising service. Problem is that most companies outsource with the explicit purpose of cutting costs and go overboard.

    Cheers!

    On the other hand, you didn't capitalize "english". I don't know what to make of that. This is slashdot, I make punctuation errors like there's no tomorrow. I fear no Nazis!

    --
    Atheist: Buddhist in a Prius
  17. So obvious and so rare... by localman · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So many companies today seem outright hostile to their customers. I am continually amazed how companies do their very best to avoid contact with their customers. Research has shown that people hate computer menus whether they're numerical or voice recognition. And if you do manage to fight your way past those, how many times have you heard "due to unusually high call volume"... 365 days a year, right? Insane.

    It's not impossible to run a great call center. I used to work at Zappos and we did our calls in-house and usually maintained wait times under 30 seconds. And the good will we generated with customers has paid off big time. We took on several more established companies with deeper pockets and so far we've left them all in the dust, largely because of our focus on customers.

    Also, it's not just about having people answering the phones. There's two other critical ingredients: the phone people have to be empowered to actually serve the customer, which means they have to be well trained, but dammit, that's what it takes to run a company. And they also need to have a voice back to the company itself, so that problems that they encounter are recognized and addressed -- because customer service problems are really just customer problems. And for all the companies spending millions on ads to establish their "brand", they could establish a real, authentic brand by resolving their customer's problems.

    There is so much room to improve this kind of thing. I applaud Netflix and wish the luck. Any company that wants to take on the 800lb gorillas need only treat each customer with care and respect. The gorillas never seem to figure this out.

    Cheers.