Slashdot Mirror


Super Pathway Discovered In Southern Ocean

WaltonNews writes in to let us know that a major underwater current called the Tasman Outflow has been discovered by Australian scientists. It helps to regulate the Earth's climate by providing water flow between three oceans in the southern hemisphere. Relatedly, a senior climate scientist has called for the establishment of a Southern Hemisphere network of deep ocean moorings, to complement the network already established in the North Atlantic. The intent is to detect any change in ocean circulation that may adversely influence global climate.

10 of 167 comments (clear)

  1. Dude! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    More radical than the EAC!

  2. I call bullshit! by stratjakt · · Score: 4, Funny

    Al Gore already figured ALL OF THIS OUT.

    There are no natural processes which affect climate. We all know what affects climate, is our use of incandescent light bulbs!

    If only we'd all switch to mercury filled compact flouros, we'd reduce this nations energy consumption by almost 0.005%! Not only that, we'd increase the amount of mercury in our groundwater by over 200%! Mercury is good for you and helps build strong bones and teeth.

    Also, we should junk our existing cars and build and purchase new ones which are marginally more efficient.

    WHEN WILL WE LEARN?! THE ONLY SOLUTION TO CLIMATE PROBLEMS IS TO SPEND SPEND SPEND SPEND ON COMPANIES AL GORE HAS STOCK IN.

    --
    I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    1. Re:I call bullshit! by OrangeTide · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I want to be that guy's friend now.

      seems like you're better off keeping a moderately efficient car for as long as you can (maybe 10 years?) instead of dumping it before its time is up to get a hybrid. not just environmentally but financially. not having to make $300/mo payments seems like you could afford a little extra gasoline.

      CFL are great, but without a wide spread recycling program it is just going to cause poison to be released into the environment. Causing severe problems to sensitive species, including ourselves. If Al Gore is so smart why did he not propose a federal mandatory disposal/recycling program for CFLs and hybrid's lead batteries?

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
  3. IT'S SETTLED SCIENCE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Obviously anyone talking about any so-called "ocean currents" affecting the Earth's climate is in the pocket of Chimpy McBushitler and his cronies in Big Oil. We all know that only SUVs, incandescent light bulbs, and not listening to Al Gore cause changes in climate.

    Holy shit, it's hot out today! WE'RE DOOMED!!!!

  4. Bad bad reporting by Yath · · Score: 5, Insightful

    None of the quotes in the article support the reporter's opinion that the intent is to detect adverse effects. It's almost like the reporter is trying to stir things up... troll, if you will, by making it look like the scientists are out to confirm some already-held conclusions that the climate is getting worse.

    --
    I always mod up spelling trolls.
  5. Energy source by QuickFox · · Score: 4, Interesting

    We should tap these ocean currents for energy. We should have machines somewhat similar to wind turbines, anchored to the sea floor, floating in the middle of the flow.

    These flows are far more steady and reliable than the wind. And no pollution. A great source of energy.

    --
    Terrorists can't threaten a country's freedom and democracy. Only lawmakers and voters can do that.
    1. Re:Energy source by evil+agent · · Score: 4, Interesting

      They're trying to do this in the East River in New York. Unsuccessfully so far...

      http://www.nytimes.com/2007/08/13/nyregion/13power .html

      --
      End transmission.
  6. That is pretty normal by WindBourne · · Score: 4, Informative

    Nearly all of the major news reporters are simply trying to make big headlines (save for several which have their own agenda's). All will spin in to suite their purpose. A good example was back in the 70's, a scientist say that climate change WAS happening and suggested that it COULD lead to global cooling. From that, a number of the articles came out that pushed that. So, quite paying attention there.

    Pay attention to what the real scientist are saying directly. Get past what fox news and oil companies have to say. Listen to the top ones (such as Dr. Hansen who is one of thousands ) and even ones like Dr Grey ( from Colo State, who is one of the very few accredited skeptics). It is a good thing to pay attention to both sides, just skip the garbage.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  7. Re:Adverse changes? by Elemenope · · Score: 5, Informative

    Hey guys, it is mid-August in what was supposed to be a record hurricane season. No storms yet.

    Apparently you do not live in Texas, where Hurricane Dean (the fourth named storm of the season) is about to hit. But hey, don't let facts get in the way of a good story.

    --
    All the techniques ever used to make men moral have been themselves thoroughly immoral... (Nietzsche)
  8. Re:Adverse changes? by E++99 · · Score: 5, Funny

    The intent is to detect any change in ocean circulation that may adversely influence global climate.

    How would they discriminate between adverse and beneficial changes?

    Haven't you heard? All change is adverse. Change that hurts humans is bad because it hurts the oppressed, and change that helps humans is bad because it helps the oppressors. Welcome to the 21st century, it's stranger than fiction.