Slashdot Mirror


Fox Hacks Fark

circletimessquare writes "Valleywag.com is reporting on a case of a hacker not covering his tracks. It seems that, via a targeted email, an admin at Fark.com downloaded a trojan, which was used to steal passwords for Fark servers. Notably, these activities were traced to an IP address in Memphis Tennessee, and to a Fox News new-media reporter. As to the veracity of the story, that is bolstered by the fact that the story was greenlit for the front page of Fark. Motive? That could range from Fark being a rumored Fox takeover target, to stealing source code for a competing Fox social networking site. If the story is true, laws have been broken, but perhaps not by the Fox News reporter: it's possible his computer was hacked as well. Whatever the truth, it's a very entertaining read, as it pushes a number of hot buttons."

10 of 188 comments (clear)

  1. Huh by VonSkippy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If the ongoing RIAA shenanigans have taught us nothing else, it's that IP does NOT equal personal Identity.

  2. "Fox Hacks Fark" by nuzak · · Score: 5, Funny

    When you're done clearing your throat, mind telling us what the title of the story is?

    --
    Done with slashdot, done with nerds, getting a life.
  3. Re:Fox take over? Stealing source code? by iron-kurton · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Why would Fox buy Fark? For starters, Fark gets a ton of traffic. They have a ton of paying subscribers.

    They are probably not after the source code or anything that ridiculous. They are pulling the same stunt they did a few months back with Photobucket -- give them negative publicity and drive down the bidding prices (assuming Fark is on the market). If you recall, Photobucket sold for like 1/3 of the original price because MySpace -- owned by Fox -- broke the linkage between their servers and Photobucket. Dirty, but brilliant.

    Too bad Fark didn't fall for it. Go get 'em Drew!!!

    --
    Change is inevitable, except from a vending machine -- Robert C. Gallagher
  4. WHBQ Fox13 != Fox News by Brian+Knotts · · Score: 5, Informative

    Fox News Channel is an entirely different thing than a local Fox affiliate, even one that is owned by News Corp. The summary above should make that more clear.

  5. Re:Hah. by Leftist+Troll · · Score: 5, Funny

    Internet? Fox is a real life hate machine.

  6. Fox Hacks Fark? by Undead+Ed · · Score: 5, Funny

    Probably not a good idean to say that out loud three times quickly in front of the kids.

    Undead Ed

  7. Re:Fox News Reporter == Journalist? by ArcherB · · Score: 5, Informative

    Fox News Reporter == Journalist?

    Well, actually, even my own biased opinion wouldn't label most Fox employees as 'not journalists' - but everytime I consider the Fox news network as a whole, I just can't think of it as a news network.


    This was not a reporter from the cable Fox News Channel, but a news anchor from a local Fox TV station. You know, the same one that shows Family Guy and The Simpsons. That is not FNC, which shows Bill O'reilly and Geraldo.

    --
    There is no "I disagree" mod for a reason. Flamebait, Troll, and Overrated are not substitutes.
  8. This is news? by east+coast · · Score: 5, Funny

    Come on. Who hasn't hacked fark?

    Err... I mean... yeah... this is terrible. Terrible I tell you.

    --
    Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
  9. His paypal account was used. by zCyl · · Score: 5, Interesting

    From the article, "Phillips also purchased, using PayPal, a paid subscription to TotalFark, a premium Fark service. The accounts all used the same IP addresses as the hacker." This makes it look a lot more like it was actually the individual. This is not just a case of the attack coming from an IP of a possibly compromised computer.

    For it to be a different individual, someone would have had to compromise the PayPal account of Phillips without him noticing. I expect there would be a shocked response from Phillips if this had been the case. Instead, the website of Darrell Phillips seems to be blank today.

  10. Re:Hah. by Dormann · · Score: 5, Informative

    For those that didn't get the reference.