Slashdot Mirror
Colleges Wrestle With Thumb Drives
Lucas123 writes "IT managers at colleges and universities are grappling with the problem of finding ways to better secure removable storage media in an environment that encourages information sharing. Draconian security mandates 'may be common in the corporate world, but "we don't have the flexibility to simply say all inbound traffic is locked down," said Jason Pufahl, information security team lead for IT services at the University of Connecticut.'"
Could anyone explain that? I don't see the point.
You're worried about the university computers? Then use a secure system that doesn't allow a user to bring along any kind of software to infect it.
You're worried about the student's data? Then teach them to use encryption and require them to use it.
Both things neither require a lot of examination nor a lot of money. What's the big deal?
We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
We restore the partitions on every boot, images are loaded from a central server, your profile is stored on a central server and loaded when you log in. Works very well.
am I the only one who read the title and thought "One two three four, I declare a thumbdrive war."?
there are 10 types of people in this world; those who get this joke, and those who don't
The portable storage blues is a mixture of incomplete policy decisions, technology adoption and resource planning . I shall explain my view. I am co-administering and directing on the technical side a 300 user R&D IT infrastructure (servers, desktops, network), which is part of a large University setup (20000 students plus) for 5 years now. Indeed, things in academia have to be open. And they can be as long as you focus on the problem.
Desktop wise, a proven conbination of transparent bridging at network level, an antivirus/spyware on the desktop and another anti-virus/spyware on the mail server will filter out most of the traditional ways of infecting systems with malware. Scripts to enforce patching and lock out users that connect to the network might be a big headache, so if you can afford the overhead do that, or switch critical services to a more secure (and yes, I mean that) desktop such as a patched version of Linux.
The issue of data migration to/from portable storage is a head-scratching one. So, where I work, we scratched our head a lot and came up with the following conclusions:
- We can train users to understand the implications of relying on portable storage.
- Encryption could protect the content. In rare cases, it was a big headache, when users lost encryption keys, or when users wanted us to face performance issues on large encrypted filesystems.
- Portable storage will never be secure from the issue of data availability. Whether your data are encrypted or not does not matter if the device gets lost or broken and the user does not sync the data (for whatever reason). Scenarios where people had grant applications on USB keys and then they lost them or miscplaced them inside a warm cup of coffee or had their kids bike going over their laptop in the garden are common.
This last point made us re-examine why people use portable devices in academic setups in the first place. Apart from the obvious reasons ( mobility convenience, etc, etc), we found that strong motives for users to use portable storage media in an academic setup exist due to two reasons:
i)Network drive user quotas were extremely low, almost not usable. In fact, I know of faculties that still give a Gig of space per user and find it generous.
ii)Lack of suitable VPN solutions, so people could authenticate and mount their drives securely from remote locations. VPNs are common place, but they were dog slow, especially for large user setups, so faculties tend to serve tenths of thousands of users with only three or four VPN gateways that can handle (together) far fewer sessions than the true average user load. The result, non existing or slow connections, users give up, buy a key or portable drive and hope for the best.
I approached our Director, explained the problem and got funding to buy a storage solution able to a quota of 20 Gigs per user and also upgrade our campus connection and have our own separate VPN gateway, able to handle up to 80% of the average session load with strong crypto. It wasn't easy, and he heard the bill, he changed a few colours. However, if you explain with numbers the cost of loosing a grant, or the research work of the last two years (some experiments are quite expensive to repeat), they can be convinced to approve the budget.
I don't know about the US, but in Europe, the broadband home market is good enough to sustain a good connection rate even with a 1Mbps/384Kbps ADSL setup for direct common file I/O (documents, spreadsheets, etc). Amongst academic networks things are even better. Storage is becoming cheaper, so making a policy decision to allow portable media and empowering your users with adequate amounts of centralized storage that is easily reachable is, in my humble opinion, the best way to combat the portable storage blues.
Why should I be held responsible if someone recites my name, rank and serial number correctly and obtains a loan based on that very simple trivial fact? The problem is in the credit industry that wants to lend money at a moments notice to people before their impulse to borrow fades away.
All we need is a very simple change of law about default reporting. Let the companies lend without checks if they want to, it is after all their money. But they should not be able to report a loan as overdue or unpaid or in default without going through due diligence to verify that the person they are accusing of being a deadbeat is really the correct person.
Let us change the burden of proof. Currently the victims of ID theft have to prove that ID theft occurred. Let us change it so that, it is the lender who should prove that ID theft did not take place.
Then it wont matter if some department loses a hard disk containing million SSNs. Will it?
sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact