New Nanoparticle Could Provide Simple Early Diagnosis Of Many Diseases
Researchers have created a new nanoparticle that could someday act as a virtually all-purpose diagnostic tool to detect many inflammatory diseases in their earliest stages, including heart disease, Alzheimer's, and arthritis. The specially-designed nanoparticles seek out hydrogen peroxide (thought to be overproduced in trace amounts in the early stages of most diseases that involve some sort of chronic inflammation in the body), and emit light when they encounter it.
We can tell the fake blonds from the true blonds without checking the carpet!
if I see anyone glowing I'll avoid them. I've been doing that anyways....
You have an unhealthy glow about you!
1. Inject billions of nanoparticles into lungs
2. Proclaim person has pre-cancer
3. Be right 100% of the time.
4. Profit!
See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
Here are mine:
:-/
1) Heart disease: You can't fit your lardass into an airplane seat.
2) Alzheimer's: Grandma asks the name of the TV show three times within ten minutes.
3) Arthritis: You're better at DDR than Guitar Hero.
Apology to Ubuntu forum.
My blog
"Researchers have created a new nanoparticle that could someday act as a virtually all-purpose diagnostic tool to detect many inflammatory diseases..."
We can do anything now that science has invented magic
In vivo imaging of hydrogen peroxide with chemiluminescent nanoparticles Dongwon Lee, Sirajud Khaja, Juan C. Velasquez-Castano, Madhuri Dasari, Carrie Sun, John Petros, W. Robert Taylor & Niren Murthy. Published online: 19 August 2007; doi:10.1038/nmat1983
The paper describes the advantages of their nanoparticles: In the paper, they demonstrate the use of this photo-marker in live mice, and are able to image the location of hydrogen peroxide anywhere in the mouse body. An obvious question regarding the technique is the toxicity of the nanoparticles. They do not discuss this in the paper (it will probably be the subject of an upcoming study), but the particles are ester polymers, with embedded dye (a pentacene derivative). So they are not using heavy-metal nanoparticles: these are peroxalate polymers. I'm not an expert in biocompatibility, but from the chemical structure, I wouldn't expect it to be highly toxic (it probably even degrades in the body).
Obviously a detailed toxicity study would be required before use in humans. However it's possible that it could be rapidly adapted to ex-situ diagnostics (e.g. on tissue explants) and then be adapted to live in-situ imaging if/when it is determined to be safe.
a Nanobot that blacklists certain virii and bacteria and kills them on sight.
It should be a simple enough function and if it terminates after a few hours everything should be okay.
That would utterly rock - no more ineffective drugs with side effects.
--- Grow a pair, liberals... stop letting the Republicans bully you!
Heart disease and heart attacks certainly DO have a lot to do with inflammation. see the anti-inflammatory properties of lipitor, and see also the use of high-dose statins in the setting of acute MI. also, educate yourself on the pathophysiology of atherosclerosis and the role of macrophages.
The short answer is: no.
The paper uses well-established chemistry to generate light-emission. They basically have an ester (peroxalate) polymer with a fluorescent dye (a pentacene derivative). A chemical reaction with hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) changes the peroxalate groups into dioxetanedione groups. This irreversible chemical reaction leads to excitation of the fluorescent dye, and hence light emission.
The hydrogen peroxide is not really the energy source for the luminescence: it is more like a catalyst that enables the peroxalate groups to convert and thereby generate light. For use in a light-emitting device, you would need a large amount of peroxalate in addition to the hydrogen peroxide. Since the peroxalate is used up, you'd have to keep replenishing it.
Basically, there are easier (cheaper) ways to generate light!
However as a diagnostic tool this is great. The paper describes the use for medical imaging, but I see no reason why this couldn't be used for detecting peroxide in other situations, such as for forensics or detecting industrial leaks or contamination. (Then again, in non-medical contexts there are probably existing detection techniques that I'm not aware of.)
Um, we can already detect inflammation. Try a technetium-111 or indium-99 labeled WBC scan.
I doubt that this would be specific enough (and of uncertain sensitivity) to be useful. How many false positives and false negatives would you get? It might end up being helpful in situations where you are looking to diagnose a suspected disease, but something this non-specific does not seem like it would be a good screening tool.
A few years back they were hawking full body (or if you were cheap partial body) CT scans as a screen. The brochures would show you the 38 year old mother of two whose renal cell carcinoma was detected and removed when it was 1cm in size, thus saving her life. They did not show you the guy who had a nodule detected on CT that looked suspicious, required a biopsy that caused a pneumothorax requiring a chest tube, that caused him to have a pneumonia with empyema, which caused respiratory failure, which caused him to be intubated for two weeks, needing a tracheostomy, etc.... to diagnose the totally benign lesion he had since he was born.
I wouldn't bet on this as the medical tricorder they are making it out to be.
Get your coat. It's time to go to the hospital.
Most cancers, Alzheimer's and heart disease have nothing to do with inflammation, chronic or otherwise.
Actually, atheroma, the cause (in nearly all cases) of coronary artery disease, and the single commonest cause of death in the Western world, is well established to be an inflammatory process. The process of developing atheroma is influenced by a number of risk factors (e.g. diabetes, hypertension, hyperlipidaemia, smoking, obesity, family history); interestingly, rheumatoid arthritis is also a significant risk factor. It has even been hypothesised that various bacterial infections (which cause inflammation) may be a cause or risk factor for atherosclerosis, though studies looking at antibiotic treatment of these purported infections have not borne this out so far.
There is no place like ~!
I do not think it means what you think it means.
Rampant carbon sequestration destroyed the Dinosaurs' tropical paradise. I'm here to help repair the damage.