Slashdot Mirror


Hear No Evil, See No Evil — E-mail Kills the Phone

coondoggie writes to tell us that in a recent study e-mail has overtaken telephony as the most common workplace communication tool. "Research reveals that 100% of the end-users surveyed use e-mail, followed by fixed-line telephones (80%), mobile telephones (76%) and instant messaging (66%). The study points out the three most ubiquitous technologies increase productivity the most. Over 70% of the end-users surveyed say e-mail impacts positively on their productivity, followed by conventional fixed-line telephony (53%) and mobile telephony (52%). From a productivity point-of-view, the research shows that instant messaging, blogs and softphones are considered most disruptive, and could negatively impact productivity if not managed properly."

12 of 155 comments (clear)

  1. E-mail survey, right? by Animats · · Score: 5, Funny

    Research reveals that 100% of the end-users surveyed use e-mail

    Let me guess. They did the survey via e-mail.

    1. Re:E-mail survey, right? by garcia · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Let me guess. They did the survey via e-mail.

      We'll they're better off doing it that way then by phone. It's not like I answer my phone for any number I don't recognize.

      For just about anything I prefer chatting, e-mail, or any other electronic method as my time isn't 100% devoted to a single person. I can do 100 other things while responding to electronic messages. With a phone call my attention is solely with one person and that's just not a good way to operate for MOST functions of my day.

    2. Re:E-mail survey, right? by gmack · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I hate phones for the same reason I hate instant messengers. I don't like things that demand my instant attention and interrupt what I'm doing.

      If I'm working on something I can check emails when it won't affect my ability to get work done. If I'm constantly answering the phone I never get anything done.

  2. Discussed this with my boss... by Smidge204 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I discussed this point with my boss once. I argued for e-mail:

    There may be a record (via phone company) of when a call took place, what number was dialed, and how long it took...

    ...but with an e-mail, all parties involved have a record of when it was sent, who received it, and what was said.

    That last part is hard to do with a phone conversation, legally anyway.
    =Smidge=

    1. Re:Discussed this with my boss... by SCHecklerX · · Score: 5, Interesting

      ...but with an e-mail, all parties involved have a record of when it was sent, who received it, and what was said.


      which is why my manager at my last job would always call me, or stop by my cube or grab me as I walked by in the hall instead of email whenever she wanted to ensure that whatever idiotic thing she wanted done (the joys of being a network security guy) could not be traced back to her. But, I'd send her a note about it each time anyway. I like having my get out of jail free card. "just to verify, you wanted me to do $foo, and understand the implications, right?"
  3. I'm not shocked... by zakezuke · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Let's say I wanted to ask someone a question, a simple question with no real need for an immediate reply. I send an e-mail. If I were to use regular phone, I have to deal with polite conversation which I may or may not have time for. Not that I don't mind idle conversation, it's just something I don't always want to deal with.

    Let's say someone was visiting me and there a traffic advisory, or something else they would need to index later. I would phone first, then text an instruction block to the phone. Same when grocery of component shopping.

    And messaging when someone is not around, e-mail is so much better than voice. Mobile phones are not always reliable to relay all the important words, and some people on land lines use really crappy answering machines, but an e-mail will always get the message out.

    E-mail is more important than phone these days. That's rather a fact of life. Welcome to the 21st century, where no one has to talk to anyone.

    --
    There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
  4. Reasons? by Enderandrew · · Score: 4, Insightful

    People hate voice mail.
    It is easier to plan, revise and think-out email.
    People are nervous about speaking.
    E-mail leaves the ever-important trail to use against people later.
    You're already using the computer, so it seems like an extra effort at times to switch tasks to the phone.

    And this is the biggest supposition on my part, but it seems that people "look forward" to getting email, where as they feel annoyed anytime the phone rings.

    --
    http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
  5. Triumvirate Communicae by skoaldipper · · Score: 5, Informative

    Email for instruction. Telephone for clarification. Remote VNC when the other two fail.

    --
    I hope, when they die, cartoon characters have to answer for their sins.
  6. My opinion by TheRealMindChild · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I gotta throw out my opinion here, with a bit of perspective from my last employer. Not everyone I worked with was nice. But the mantra was throughout the company, if you can't get them on the phone, hunt them down in person. So when someone got a bug up his ass about some issue, they would call my phone... over and over. You couldn't send them to voicemail... they would know right away you were there... so you had to wait out the three or four consecutive phone calls in hopes that they will just give up. But they rarely did. They would storm into my office ranting and raving about XYZ and they need ABC and whatever else they could complain about to keep me from my work. I honestly fought for an hour with a coworker (salesguy) that FOR THE HUNDREDTH TIME STILL COULDN'T INSERT A PICTURE, FROM FILE, INTO A POWERPOINT PRESENTATION! And somehow this was my fault, because I was the computer guy. But I digress... anyway, even on the phone, they all went a mile a minute, giving me no time to think, no time to compose, nothing I could do where I could come out on top of that situation.

    For this sake I preferred email corrispondance. I could think, sometimes over hours, what I needed to say, and constuctively lay it out how the situation needed.

    But the old folks out there... the ones who insist I wear a tie, shine my shoes, shave my face TO SIT BEHIND A DESK, actually told me I was no longer allowed to respond to any issues of ANY kind via email. It had to be by phone.

    Seriously, welcome to the 21st century. It is the future. A better mousetrap has been made. Quit making me catch mice with a broomstick and a bucket.

    --

    "When life gives you lemons, don't make lemonade. Make life take the lemons back!" -- Cave Johnson
  7. My current boss does that. by khasim · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I lost points on my last review because of my "over reliance" on email. And I'll probably lose points on the next one.

    Don't forget that in a lot of email systems I can tell when you've opened my email and whether you deleted it or not.

    Email is its own paper trail AND with magical CYA powers. And that really annoys a certain type of personality.

  8. Duh... by FlyByPC · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Email is asynchronous. Also, for (legitimate) emails, it's a lot more time-consuming for the sender to type it (~40wpm?) than for the recipient to read it (~a few hundred wpm). It doesn't take as much time -- and can be saved for handy reference, too.

    I for one welcome our new SMTP overlords.

    --
    Paleotechnologist and connoisseur of pretty shiny things.
  9. Reminds me of our new VOIP system by Kadin2048 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    A few months ago my company came through the office and tore out everyone's regular phones and replaced them with super-duper Cisco VOIP sets.

    The things are crap (you have to sign into them every morning ... as if I don't have enough passwords to remember already, now I need to sign in to my freaking phone?) but they do have one upshot. If I just don't sign into the thing, nobody can call me -- the calls just roll right over into voice mail. And since my voicemails get emailed to me as attachments (where I can conveniently play them at faster-than-normal speed), I can basically ignore the phone handset and do everything through my PC.

    By my unofficial count, I'd say something like 30-50 percent of the office is doing the same thing, either intentionally or just because they can't remember to sign into the phones in the morning. I think it's actually boosted productivity -- nobody uses the phones to call around the office anymore, unless they've already sent an email or an IM to see if the person is available on the other end.

    Maybe they're not so bad after all...

    --
    "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."