Gunplay Blamed For Cutting Fiber
coondoggie writes "Internet service providers in the US experienced a service slowdown Monday after fiber-optic cables near Cleveland were apparently sabotaged by gunfire. TeliaSonera AB, which lost the northern leg of its US network to the cut, said that the outage began around 7 p.m. Pacific Time on Sunday night. When technicians pulled up the affected cable, it appeared to have been shot up over a length of a kilometer. 'Somebody had been shooting with a gun or a shotgun into the cable,' said a TeliaSonera spokesman. The company declined to name the service provider whose lines had been cut, but a source familiar with the situation said the lines are owned by Level 3 Communications Inc. Level 3 could not be reached for comment."
Its not speculated that it was Level3 its Cogent. Its all over Nanog.
http://www.teliasoneraic.com/tsicWeb/tsic/section
So, no, the original article was in Imperial measurements, but the summary converts it to km for the sake of having a round number.
We all know what to do, but we don't know how to get re-elected once we have done it
A shotgun shoot a pattern that spreads out. The shot would eventually hit the walls of the tube and while bouncing off, each point of contact would remove inertia as well as deflect it into the other side. I can't imagine a single shot going 1 kilometer in distance like this.
1 km is over 1000 yards. Most shotguns loss their effectiveness after 70-80 or even 100 yards and rarely have enough punch to kill something after 60 yards or so. And this is in an open field without the small confined walls the for the shot to bounce off of. I would be surprised if you could get a shot to go more then 30 yards in a tube like this and still have enough energy to penetrate the fiber lines.
Buried fiber optic cable has signs marking it along the way, to prevent this sort of thing from happening accidentally.
Slow Down, Cowboy! It's been 60 minutes since you last successfully posted a comment.
2 feet (0.3 metres, roughly)
2 feet is ~.6 meters.
I think the article may be wrong.
. html or here for the thread index (lots of followups).
Over on the NANOG mailing list, which has a lot of people from the major U.S. backbones and networks subscribed to it, it is being reported/said that the line was Cogent's, not Level 3's, and that Cogent at one point had an advisory up about it.
Lots of people posted traceroutes that seem to confirm that it was definitely Cogent that took the hit. Packets were basically going all over the place on their network yesterday, and people who had fixed their routers to prefer Cogent over other backbones (apparently Bell) were having some slowdowns as a result.
See http://www.merit.edu/mail.archives/nanog/msg02483
"Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
No they don't
Infuriate left and right