Most Laws Attempting Limits of Violent Videogames Fail
circletimessquare writes "Good news for common sense: the New York Times examines the track record of state laws attempting to put additional limits on violent videogames, and finds that the courts have struck almost all of them down as unconstitutional. Especially notable is this gem of a quote, from Judge Richard A. Posner: 'Violence has always been and remains a central interest of humankind and a recurrent, even obsessive theme of culture both high and low ... It engages the interest of children from an early age, as anyone familiar with the classic fairy tales collected by Grimm, Andersen, and Perrault are aware. To shield children right up to the age of 18 from exposure to violent descriptions and images would not only be quixotic, but deforming; it would leave them unequipped to cope with the world as we know it.'"
Modding parent down as redundant is just malicious modding. Why touch it . . . concentrate on modding up rather than down . . . this comment does not detract from the thread, is not redundant, and simply agrees with GP. Fscking get a grip.
Oh, and his supporters will mindlessly digg up any article about him on said website, no matter what the article actually says about him.
I'm the guy with the unpopular opinion