Slashdot Mirror


Warner Bros. to Turn All 15 Oz Books Into Movies

Lucas123 writes "After purchasing the rights to the Oz books from Ted Turner Warner Bros., along with Village Roadshow Pictures, will be taking Spawn creator Todd McFarlane's idea to produce movies based on the Oz books. They've obtained the rights to the 14 titles written by 'The Wizard of Oz' author L. Frank Baum, as well as the the fifteenth book ('The Royal Book of Oz'), written by Ruth Plumly Thompson. Screen Writer John Olson's 'vision is of a bit tamer PG movie and hopefully the two can find some middle ground of compromise that will please them both and not hurt the final product.'"

17 of 249 comments (clear)

  1. So what you're telling me... by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 4, Informative

    Is that Hollywood is preparing to shit all over another part of my childhood? 13 times?

    Great.

    Man, Return to Oz was such a bastardization of "Marvelous Land" and "Ozma" - still, it had more Baum to it than the old MGM "all singing, all dancing" all vomiting wreck.

    --
    "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
    Never been known to fail..."
  2. Aren't they in the public domain? by cpghost · · Score: 4, Informative

    L. Frank Baum's books have been in the public domain for quite some time now. They're available in Project Gutenberg, on Wikisource and everywhere.

    --
    cpghost at Cordula's Web.
    1. Re:Aren't they in the public domain? by DerekLyons · · Score: 2, Informative

      Just because the text (which is under copyright) are public domain does not mean the characters (which are under trademark) are.

    2. Re:Aren't they in the public domain? by 1u3hr · · Score: 2, Informative
      Just because the text (which is under copyright) are public domain does not mean the characters (which are under trademark) are.

      A specific version and depiction of the characters could be trademarked -- as the Tin Man's costume. But not a Tin Man you designed just referencing the book and your own imagination.

  3. Math is hard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    If you're going to include Thompson, then there are more than 15. Here's wikipedia's list of the "famous forty"
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Oz_books

  4. buying rights != making movies; uneven quality by bcrowell · · Score: 4, Informative

    Just because they've bought the rights, that doesn't mean they'll actually make the movies. It's extremely common for a studio to buy rights to a book, then never make the movie.

    The quality of the Oz books is very uneven. Some of the later ones have long, extremely tedious sections that serve no purpose except to bring back a long list of favorite characters like Jack Pumpkinhead. A lot of the plots revolve around lame puns.

  5. Oh, real tough getting the rights to all 15 books! by thisissilly · · Score: 3, Informative
    ...given that all 15 are in the Public Domain, having been published before 1923. In fact, I'm surprised they didn't claim 16, seeing as the 16th was published in 1922.

    Everyone in the US has the right to make any of those books into a movie.

  6. Seems right... by msauve · · Score: 4, Informative

    the Oz books were published between 1900 and 1920. Works published before 1923 are in the public domain. (Mickey was born circa 1928).

    Here's my vote that they do Tik-Tok first. My mom had first editions of all the books when I was a kid, that was my favorite.

    --
    "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
  7. Re:Public Domain by Shrubbman · · Score: 2, Informative

    Dude, the first OZ book was published in 1900. The 15th book they mention was published in 1921. There's actually some 40 books in total considered 'canon' along side a pile of either unauthorized or non-canonical novels set in Oz as well.

  8. You Can Read Them Online, You Know ... by eldavojohn · · Score: 3, Informative

    That's correct, enjoy them at Project Gutenberg or the Online Books Project at U Penn. Unfortunately, I can't seem to find the one by Plumly ...

    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:You Can Read Them Online, You Know ... by Chyeld · · Score: 2, Informative

      Google Books seems to have it. If the link doesn't work (haven't tried linking through it before), just search for the name.

      This is actually the first of the 19 books she wrote to continue the story after Baum died. However it's a mix between fans whether they consider the books cannon or not. Some feel she took too much liberty with the characters and situations.

      Most of her books, however, are still covered by copyright. It's only the very earliest that have passed back into the public domain.

    2. Re:You Can Read Them Online, You Know ... by djdavetrouble · · Score: 3, Informative

      Theres also a bunch of audio books on archive.org, some are read by my dad, Roy Trumbull......(had to plug !!!) He has made a hobby recording public domain works and posting them
      on the internet.
      oz on archive.org audio

      --
      music lover since 1969
  9. Re:Public Domain by fm6 · · Score: 5, Informative
    It's yet another sloppy summary of TFA, which mentions two distinct facts:
    • Warner plans to adapt all 15 books.
           
    • Warner bought the rights to the 1939 movie from Ted Turner. (Actually, they bought Ted Turner's whole media operation, which happened to include his film library, which happened to include this movie. This happened over 10 years ago; it's connection with this announcement isn't clear.)

    The writer of the TFA was a little sloppy, and the submitter was very sloppy, so of course the facts got a bit jumbled. Welcome to Slashdot.
  10. Re:Wizard of Oz theory by geekoid · · Score: 2, Informative

    Except he never mentions that, ever. Most of that speculation comes from the style of drawing, say that they were the same style that appeared in political cartoons; however they fail to mention that the reason that style was used in political cartoons because it was there style at the time. almost any drawing from that periods will look similar.

    really, it's a case of finding pattern because you are looking for a pattern. Just because you interpret a pattern doesn't mean that pattern was intentional.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  11. Re:Good Grief by jkoke · · Score: 4, Informative

    They found the forest very thick on this side, and it looked dark and gloomy. After the Lion had rested they started along the road of yellow brick, silently wondering, each in his own mind, if ever they would come to the end of the woods and reach the bright sunshine again. To add to their discomfort, they soon heard strange noises in the depths of the forest, and the Lion whispered to them that it was in this part of the country that the Kalidahs lived.

    "What are the Kalidahs?" asked the girl.

    "They are monstrous beasts with bodies like bears and heads like tigers," replied the Lion, "and with claws so long and sharp that they could tear me in two as easily as I could kill Toto. I'm terribly afraid of the Kalidahs."

    "I'm not surprised that you are," returned Dorothy. "They must be dreadful beasts."

    The Lion was about to reply when suddenly they came to another gulf across the road. But this one was so broad and deep that the Lion knew at once he could not leap across it.

    So they sat down to consider what they should do, and after serious thought the Scarecrow said:

    "Here is a great tree, standing close to the ditch. If the Tin Woodman can chop it down, so that it will fall to the other side, we can walk across it easily."

    "That is a first-rate idea," said the Lion. "One would almost suspect you had brains in your head, instead of straw."

    The Woodman set to work at once, and so sharp was his axe that the tree was soon chopped nearly through. Then the Lion put his strong front legs against the tree and pushed with all his might, and slowly the big tree tipped and fell with a crash across the ditch, with its top branches on the other side.

    They had just started to cross this queer bridge when a sharp growl made them all look up, and to their horror they saw running toward them two great beasts with bodies like bears and heads like tigers.

    "They are the Kalidahs!" said the Cowardly Lion, beginning to tremble.

    "Quick!" cried the Scarecrow. "Let us cross over."

    So Dorothy went first, holding Toto in her arms, the Tin Woodman followed, and the Scarecrow came next. The Lion, although he was certainly afraid, turned to face the Kalidahs, and then he gave so loud and terrible a roar that Dorothy screamed and the Scarecrow fell over backward, while even the fierce beasts stopped short and looked at him in surprise.

    But, seeing they were bigger than the Lion, and remembering that there were two of them and only one of him, the Kalidahs again rushed forward, and the Lion crossed over the tree and turned to see what they would do next. Without stopping an instant the fierce beasts also began to cross the tree. And the Lion said to Dorothy:

    "We are lost, for they will surely tear us to pieces with their sharp claws. But stand close behind me, and I will fight them as long as I am alive."

    "Wait a minute!" called the Scarecrow. He had been thinking what was best to be done, and now he asked the Woodman to chop away the end of the tree that rested on their side of the ditch. The Tin Woodman began to use his axe at once, and, just as the two Kalidahs were nearly across, the tree fell with a crash into the gulf, carrying the ugly, snarling brutes with it, and both were dashed to pieces on the sharp rocks at the bottom.

    "Well," said the Cowardly Lion, drawing a long breath of relief, "I see we are going to live a little while longer, and I am glad of it, for it must be a very uncomfortable thing not to be alive. Those creatures frightened me so badly that my heart is beating yet."

    "Ah," said the Tin Woodman sadly, "I wish I had a heart to beat."

  12. librivox.org for PD audio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    speaking of plugs -- you should also check librivox.org if you want public domain texts as audio books.... if they don't have a book you want, then record it for them!

  13. Dastar Corp. v. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp. by tepples · · Score: 2, Informative

    But do they have the right to title them as "Oz" movies? Eight justices of the U.S. Supreme Court have ruled that trademarks cannot be used to extend the term of exclusive rights in a work whose U.S. copyright has expired. Dastar Corp. v. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp., 539 U.S. 23 (2003).