The White House Crowd Control Manual
quizzicus writes "The Washington Post writes today about a sensitive White House document detailing how to screen for, silence, and remove protesters who show up at the President's public appearances. Obtained by an ACLU subpoena in the Rank v. Jenkins case, the Presidential Advance Manual (PDF) is dated October 2002. It lays out strategies such as searching audience members at the door for hidden protest material, strategically placing 'rally squads' throughout the crowd to intercept and shout down hecklers, and forcefully removing dissenters who cannot be squelched. The manual advises, however, that staff should 'decide if the solution would cause more negative publicity than if the demonstrators were simply left alone.'"
Where is the tech in this article? Are they zapping the protestors to the Alien mothership?
If you read the link you pointed to, you'd see that the alleged assailants were members of a Teamster's local that supported Republicans:
So taking their (alleged) actions as evidence that Democrats beat the crap out of people, is problematic.
But yes, there are nutjobs on all sides who have no respect for free speech.
Personally, I usually feel heartened by right-wing counterprotestors. As much as I appreciate the fact than an argument is not responsible for those who believe it, the frothing-at-the-mouth nutjobs who make up most of the turnout for pro-war counter-rallys at anti-war marches make a strong gut-check that I'm on the right side.
Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
You cannot wash away blood with blood