Slashdot Mirror


Sys Admin Magazine Ceases Publication

keithl writes "I received a postcard in the mail today informing me that Sys Admin magazine has ceased publication. 'We regret to inform you that the magazine has ceased publication effective with the August 2007 issue.' Only paid subscribers with remaining issues receive this mailing. If you do nothing, they will send you a copy of the Sys Admin archive CD (1992 – August 2007), or you can return the card for a full refund of all unsent issues. The deadline to return the postcard for a refund is October 1, 2007." The magazine's Web site has no word that I could find on the closing down of print publication.

2 of 134 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Eh... by eln · · Score: 5, Interesting

    sysadmin magazine was a good idea in theory, and I have read a few of their (print) issues, but it always seemed like they were shooting for too much of a novice crowd. They did highlight some interesting things, but the articles were rarely very in-depth, and the code snippets were usually pretty basic. I had contemplated getting a subscription a few times, but it seemed like 90% of any issue would be basic stuff I already knew or could easily figure out on my own. A junior sysadmin may be able to learn a lot from the magazine, but probably not anyone at a higher level than that.

    For a magazine that was supposed to be geared toward professional sysadmins, I would have liked to see some more hard-core technical content, including some actual code magic rather than "magic" that anyone with experience in the language would find very basic. I would have rather seen more kernel tuning and less "sorting your calendar in PHP" crap.

    Maybe they were hitting at exactly the wrong spot: their focus was too narrow to be an overview type of magazine, but it was too broad to really get into the nitty gritty of any one thing.

  2. Neglect by not_hylas(+) · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Neglected, pure and simple.
    They had the platform, the had the forum, they had an audience.
    When it came to subscribe once again, I had to think - has this magazine answered, delivered, proposed anything of consequence? [not counting Amy's column]
    It was supposed to be about UNIX (?), not just Solaris.

    http://www.google.com/Top/Computers/Software/Opera ting_Systems/Unix/

    System Administrators want answers about the OS. [and the sum thereof]
    I wanted Sys Admin to give me configuration tips, tuning tricks ... insight.
    I WANT magazines, not PDFs, I want something to refer back to, in these last few years I just skimmed it, read Amy Rich, then it went straight to the shelf.
    It's too bad.
    I liked the idea of the magazine, but they suffered neglect, from staff and ultimately reader interest alike.

    --
    ~hylas