Slashdot Mirror


Generating Nano Oscillatory Motion

KentuckyFC sends us to arxivblog.com, where he summarizes (in prose that is somewhat more twee than we usually encounter in writing about physics) the conversion of a constant force into oscillatory motion on the nano scale. Here is the article preprint. A research group at the University of Wisconsin-Madison has made mushroom-shaped nano-pillars that oscillate in a constant DC field, like metronomes.

14 of 70 comments (clear)

  1. Twee by camperdave · · Score: 3, Informative
    --
    When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    1. Re:Twee by MontyApollo · · Score: 2, Informative

      The title is "Invasion of the jivin' nano-shrooms" just to give you a taste of the twee.

    2. Re:Twee by Hatta · · Score: 2, Funny

      Q: How do you titillate an ocelot?

      A: Ocillate it's tit a lot.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
  2. Magic mushrooms? by Prysorra · · Score: 2

    So they tilt to the beat, do they?

    Well.....they still aint got nothing on the singning mushrooms from Tength Kingdom!

    Ah.....suck an elf.

  3. Smaller Scale Still by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 2, Informative

    Excuse me, but, doesn't this happen on the atomic level? Apply heat, and atoms vibrate.

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
    1. Re:Smaller Scale Still by jcorno · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Excuse me, but, doesn't this happen on the atomic level? Apply heat, and atoms vibrate.


      Yeah. At random frequencies, and in random directions. What good is that?
    2. Re:Smaller Scale Still by camperdave · · Score: 3, Funny

      Well, by simply hooking the logic circuits of a Bambleweeny 57 Sub-Meson Brain to an atomic vector plotter suspended in a strong Brownian Motion producer (say a nice hot cup of tea) one could make all the molecules in a hostess' undergarments leap one foot simultaneously to the left in accordance with the theory of indeterminacy. Some people might use it to break the ice at parties.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
  4. That ain't twee. by camperdave · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I didn't know what "twee" was, so I had to look it up. Applying the jive filter doesn't make it nauseatingly cute, just nauseating.

    Besides, is this what Slashdot has devolved to? All you have to do is apply a text filter to an article to get your story submission accepted? Sheesh! Maybe if I had borkified the story I submitted a couple of weeks ago about the shuttle not needing its tiles repaired it wouldn't have been rejected.

    --
    When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    1. Re:That ain't twee. by veganboyjosh · · Score: 3, Funny

      i speek bork, yuoo insenseetife-a clud!

    2. Re:That ain't twee. by mikael · · Score: 4, Funny

      I use a jive filter for reading slashdot - it helps liven up those technically complex stories:

      Slashdot in Jive

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
  5. A song springs to mind... by gardyloo · · Score: 3, Funny

    ... Jumping electrons = badgers;
                nano-pillar = mushroom;
                I'm still working on the "Snaaaake! Snaaaake!" bits.

  6. Re:(YES it is) - Re:NOT a constant force. by Control+Group · · Score: 2, Informative

    It's really no different a concept than seeing a bouncing ball as subject to a constant (gravitational) force, except when it's not, as when the concrete smacks it back upward.

    If you have an oscillating body of a given mass, then obviously the net force on the body isn't constant, given F=ma. There's no question about that (though it would certainly be newsworthy if someone discovered that F=ma doesn't hold). The question here is whether the input force is constant. The story is that they've replicated on a nano-scale turning a constant force input into an oscillating net force at the point of interest, something which has apparently not been done before.
    --

    Reality has a conservative bias: it conserves mass, energy, momentum...
  7. Not only twee...it is wrong too by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Firstly electromagnetism is understood down to scales many orders of magnitudes lower than the nanoscale. QED is the second most accurate scientific theory ever (special relativity is the winner) and works at distances considerably less than nuclear diameters (one million times smaller than nano-scale). Secondly a pendulum does not convert a constant force into an oscillation because it has to have an initial excitation in the form of an applied force. This force must be applied and then removed so it is non-constant. Even if we ignore that the pendulum requires a string tension to work and that is an EM force so it is wrong to think of it as pure gravity. Conclusion: this guys physics is as heavily accented as his american.

  8. Nano oscillatory motion? by HandsOnFire · · Score: 2, Funny

    that's the term my gf used when she mentioned having sex with her ex-boyfriend.