Valve Says Choice to Make DX10 Vista-Only Hurt PC Gaming
Erris writes "Valve's President Gabe Newell is calling Microsoft's choice to make DirectX 10 Vista-only a 'terrible mistake' that has harmed gaming. His company's latest hardware study shows the strategy has not moved gamers onto Vista. The result is that almost no one is using the newest version of DirectX, and companies are shying away from creating new input devices that support it. Nine months after release, after Christmas, after graduation, and with school mostly back in session, still only 8% of gamers are using it." Update: 08/27 21:09 GMT by Z : An AC points out that these numbers may be framed poorly given uptake numbers for XP's release.
Didn't you already write about this?
"It does not do to leave a live dragon out of your calculations, if you live near him." - Tolkien
you should have an account for writing such insightful comments. Now you are not too likely to get modded up.
#
#\ @ ? Colonize Mars
#
It's hard for game company VPs to understand how they will make money by releasing free software. The 4 freedoms and such are kind of anathema to their current business model of selling software for money (as opposed to good will and community driven software improvements).
Now quick, someone post a link to the top 100 open source games, cause that will show them.
I'll do everyone a favour and actually link to all the comments on your journal. That way people can be slightly more informed as to how dedazo and I 'helped' you.
"It does not do to leave a live dragon out of your calculations, if you live near him." - Tolkien
roflmao, you're hilarious ^^ :).
....
where did he say you need a 3000$ box (or that a 3000$ box isn't enough?)
it's just that most pc gamers make big updates from time to time, so dx10 cards and vista will grow in marker share when people feel the need to update their dx9 generation rig to a dx10 generation monster
also, about the ps3 (and xbox360), yeah, we know, it's cheaper, but the hardware stays the same for the next few years, so little progress over that time, and the pc's are already matching it's performance, in 2 or 3 years pc games will be a lot better than the console games. not to mention it are also different kind of games (besides the generic cross platform hyped crap for teens)
and just wondering, why a ps3? i'm no console player myself, but from what i heard so far from xbox360 vs ps3 is that the 360 is cheaper, better graphics (for now at least), more and better games,
or is this another episode in your great quest against m$?