Slashdot Mirror


Lenovo Looking to Buy Seagate, May Raise Political Concerns

andy1307 writes "According to an article in the New York Times, Lenovo has expressed an interest in buying Seagate. This has raised concerns among American government officials about the risks to national security in transferring high technology to China. From the article: 'In recent years, modern disk drives, used to store vast quantities of digital information securely, have become complex computing systems, complete with hundreds of thousands of lines of software that are used to ensure the integrity of data and to offer data encryption.'"

22 of 255 comments (clear)

  1. Oh my god, it's the Red Scare! by r_jensen11 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Quick! Where's McCarthy when we need him?

    Honestly, they're raising the same fuss as when IBM sold off their PC and laptop divisions to Lenovo. There's no reason why we should be paranoid about stuff this. It's business.

    1. Re:Oh my god, it's the Red Scare! by Kjella · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Honestly, they're raising the same fuss as when IBM sold off their PC and laptop divisions to Lenovo. There's no reason why we should be paranoid about stuff this. It's business.

      Yes, it is. And when those Chinese-owned leaders get certain hints to store certain things in "bad" sectors who might suddenly resurface in "slack" space seeded with a salt to look like random noise or risk being shut down, that's also business. Or there's a kill code that they can send out to wipe itself and bring down military systems in an emergency situation. No, it's not just a gag China does just to pull off something like that, they're certainly in it for the business. But when business and government go hand in hand like they do in China, you'd also be naive to think they don't further each other's goals. It's not like that the lust for money is mutually exclusive with the lust for power, quite rather the opposite.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    2. Re:Oh my god, it's the Red Scare! by iminplaya · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Where's McCarthy when we need him?

      He's everywhere. In the white house, the halls of congress. He's running the FBI, DHS, DEA... He's listening to your phone calls, reading your mail... He lives on the west coast, the east coast, the middle coast, down the block, right next door... He has penetrated your collective soul. He is everywhere.

      --
      What?
    3. Re:Oh my god, it's the Red Scare! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      No, it isn't. Bush has never accused members of the government of being terrorists.

    4. Re:Oh my god, it's the Red Scare! by couchslug · · Score: 4, Insightful

      McCarthy's excesses didn't make opposing Mao and Stalin wrong.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    5. Re:Oh my god, it's the Red Scare! by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Heh. I was watching Bill Maher, and he said something to the effect that America's desire to buy stuff as cheap as possible is the reason they're made from poison, mud and shit.

      --
      Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
  2. So don't buy Seagate by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So a Chinese Company wants to buy a Canadian (?!?!?) company that makes hard drives. Fine. Stop buying Seagate for the NSA, and move on with our lives.

    --
    SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
  3. Isn't it a bit late to worry? by tftp · · Score: 3, Insightful
    This has raised concerns among American government officials about the risks to national security in transferring high technology to China

    I think the horse has not only left the barn, it's off the planet by now. What were those "government officials" thinking for last decades? And this process is not [easily] reversible - China has all the factories now, and rephrasing Mao, "Power comes out of the gates of the factory." This much we see already.

    1. Re:Isn't it a bit late to worry? by refactored · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I suspect an engineer does better than an economist.

      An economist dreams that fancy accounting can fix things, an engineer tends to think in terms of conservation laws, reservoirs and pressures.

      What's the end game?

      I'm not sure, the things I have been reading about China suggests it may not be what Americans think it is...

      You see China is Old. China is old old old and utterly massive.

      It has basically been way overpopulated and resource depleted since about 1900....

      America is just waking up to thoughts of Resource Depletion.

      China has been living them for over a century.

      Now you have sold your real world economy to a mammoth hungry maw for dreams of "Intellectual Property". (Something the Chinese only believe in if the wind is in their favour)

      Last I heard the Chinese had bankrolled a grand shopping spree....what they buy will be very very interesting...

  4. I'm no expert, but by Bombula · · Score: 2, Insightful

    the statement that, "the risks to national security in transferring high technology to China" referring to hard drive technology just sounds a bit silly. I'd bet dollars to donuts that any technology latent in a commercial hard drive that the Chinese might be after can be reverse engineered right off the shelf. The only exception might be the encryption component, but - someone correct me here if I'm completely wrong - as I understand it 128-bit encryption is no longer restricted by the US government, presumably because they can break it, and that is why 128-bit is also the current 'limit' or whatever on commercial encryption products.

    --
    A-Bomb
  5. Double Standard by pembo13 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The US Government will gladly take/steal technology however they can, but they always have this hissy fit when when another country is trying to advance their own technology, directly, or indirectly.

    --
    "Thanks for all the money you paid to us. We've used it to buy off ISO among other things" -Microsoft
    1. Re:Double Standard by chuckymonkey · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Aaaaannnd? Really how is that any different than any other country. Let me break it down Technology=Power Governments like power so naturally governments want to keep power and get more power. So advancing technology is in the best interest of the country and giving it away is not. Of course there's going to be a double standard, as long as there's war (SPOILER ALERT: with humans there always will be until we destroy ourselves) it's in every country's best interest to hoard technology/power and keep it away from potential enemies. I know it's great to slam the US, it's a pretty popular hobby lately what with how much of an ass GW can be, but with this one it's not just the US any country with the resources to do so would do it too. Do you really think that China are altruistic and benevolent? Really? I would love to have this ideological view of the world where everything is fluffy bunnies and every human is out to help other humans, but that's just not the case. When it comes down to it every country is out for its best interests, I don't care where they're from or what kind of people live there.

      --
      "Some books contain the machinery required to create and sustain universes."-Tycho
  6. The irony of it all by v3xt0r · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This government, the same one who has no problem allowing China to take hundreds of thousands of jobs away from Americans simply by our failed international trade policies, wants us to worry about national security issues related to 1 corporation. What about all the other national security issues that are caused by trade w. China, or any other socialist/communist country for that matter? What about all the (60%+) staff @ Los Alamos?? Lenovo is the least of my concerns, at this point.

    --
    the only permanence in existence, is the impermanence of existence.
    1. Re:The irony of it all by ClamIAm · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What about all the other national security issues that are caused by trade with ... any other socialist/communist country for that matter?

      Oh shit! Linus Torvalds must be an undercover spook from the Finnish government!

      Seriously though, I'm guessing that you're an American, which means your idea of "socialism" is probably something like Soviet Russia. Which is absurd. Socialism encompasses a very broad area of political thought, and should not be treated like some extreme ideology.

  7. hehe National what??? by xednieht · · Score: 4, Insightful

    China buys blocks and blocks of our national debt, and they're concerned about the Seagate purchase? pfft

    With their ownership of US debt, China is probably as concerned about our national security as we are.

    --

    Hope is the currency of fools
  8. Consolidation in hard drive market? by bomanbot · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Wasnt Seagate the company that bought Maxtor not too long ago? And will the buyout end there or will we see the great consolidation in the hard drive business as well, so that in the end it may look like the CPU market, especially for x86 processors?

    I mean, there are not that many hard drive companies left anyway, the big players are Seagate/Maxtor, Hitachi, Western Digital and Samsung and thats about it. Let Seagate be bought and maybe merge another company or two and the hard dirve market looks an awfully lot like AMD/Intel or ATI(AMD)/NVIDIA, which may not be as beneficial as we think....

  9. Re:Damn it by ivan256 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    [Insert country name here]'s products are hit or miss to. That's why most people judge product quality on reviews and the reputation of the individual maker rather than the region in which they are manufactured.

    Now if you have political reasons for not giving business to a particular country or government, that's another story, and is perfectly respectable.

  10. Fuck nationalism, what about quality? by pavon · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Seagate is pretty much the only computer componets company that hasn't wavered much in quality over the years. IBM, Western Digital, and Maxtor have all gone through phases ranging from good quality to absolute crap, while Seagate has continued to put out consistently good products.

    I understand that theory that larger companies can decrease overhead and thus be more efficient, but that never seems to happen. The success rate on mergers looks almost as bad as on startups. But this stupid economic model that is the stockmarket rewards growth (even artificial growth) over all else - quality, efficiency you name it. We created this system, and the laws that govern it, and then we act shocked, just shocked, when the market consolidates to the point of a monopoly. What is the point of even having anti-trust laws when we not only allow but encourage consolidation at every turn.

    Sorry, I'm just so tired of seeing all these mergers that decrease the amount of competition in the field and end up destroying everything that was good about the company to begin with.

  11. China Seagate by hackus · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Question: These people allowed all of our technology such as computers...etc....out of the country and NOW they have a problem with simple storage devices?

    Whats wrong with this picture?

    China already owns Taiwan all nice and legal like.

    The Chinese already HAVE everything they need to build anything they want.

    The Chinese OWN the United States. China has been buying our treasury bills to float the home mortgages everyone has for christ sake, along with those credit cards everyone on average owes like $5K on!

    NOW they have a problem with moving a relatively simple technology like drive storage out of the country?

    Gimme a beak!

    -Hack

    --
    Got Geometrodynamics? Awe, too hard to figure out? Too bad.
  12. Re:War of Quality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Same here. I couldn't believe it when I pulled my nifty new 300 GB Seagate hard drive out of the box last year and it said MADE IN CHINA.

    So far so good though.

    It seems like everything is made in China now. There's just no way to avoid it any longer. Although I'll tell you this, the stuff coming out of China today is cheaper than the stuff from Japan, Taiwan, etc.. that was made 10 ~ 15 years ago.

    The last time I bought a CD player a couple years ago the $100 ones looked as cheaply made as the $30 ones. It's actually rather sad how much quality has fallen. Not only is the labor cheap now but they also make everything cheaply there. Not that I'm saying China is at fault. In most cases it's the foreign companies who either contract with companies in China to make this cheap crap for them or they buy Chinese designed products and just re-brand them.

    Re-branding of Chinese products is so common now it isn't even funny. When you buy a "name brand" there's always a good chance that they didn't even design it!

    Although one cool thing we now have because of China. The dollar store! I can't believe the stuff the Dollar Tree can sell for a buck! It's amazing! I'm in there every week.

  13. Re:No wonder the US$ is in free fall by amightywind · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Americans like to buy Chinese stuff with their greenbacks, but refuse to honor them when the Chinese attempt to purchase anything of value.

    When was the last time the Chinese government allowed the purchase of a Chinese company? Never. China trade is not reciprocol. China is free to overbid for Seagate if they want. But with the gross trade imbalance, currency manipulation (which costs US jobs), and export quality problems they would be unwise to pervoke a labor friendly congress anymore than they have. The US economy in free fall grows at a rate of 4%/yr. China will have to grow at 10% for the next 100 years to equal it in size. Good ruck!

    --
    an ill wind that blows no good
  14. It was already produced in China by WoLpH · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So what will change? Perhaps some manager will move but for the rest it's exactly the same as before.