Slashdot Mirror


TorrentSpy Must Preserve Data In RAM For MPAA

Transient writes "Reaffirming a magistrate's earlier decision, a federal judge has ordered TorrentSpy to begin keeping server logs as it defends itself against an MPAA lawsuit. In her opinion, Judge Florence-Marie Cooper interpreted federal discovery rules broadly. ' Judge Cooper took issue with TorrentSpy's argument that data in RAM is not "stored." She noted RAM's function as primary storage and that the storage of data in RAM — even if not permanently archived — makes it electronically stored information governed by federal discovery rules.' Given that TorrentSpy has limited access for users in the US, the ruling may be moot. But it does set a precedent for other, similar cases. 'Under this interpretation, any data stored in RAM could be subject to a subpoena, as at a basic level it is a "medium from which information can be obtained" just like a hard drive. '"

1 of 489 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Evidence destruction ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    Exactly right. RAM means random access memory, and the pirates think they can hide the contents of their hard drives with their 'random' encryptions. Well Judge Cooper isn't going to be fooled. And I'm sure the nice MPAA technical expert told her exactly what you just said.