Slashdot Mirror
Thieves Hacking Security Cameras?
The FBI is investigating fifteen store robberies in eleven states, committed via phone and internet. The perpetrators hack the store's security system so they can observe their victims. They then make customers take their clothes off and get the store to wire money. From the article, "A telephone caller making a bomb threat to a Hutchinson, Kan., grocery store kept more than 100 people hostage, demanding they disrobe and that the store wire money to his bank account. ... officials were investigating whether the caller was out of state and may have hacked into the store's security system. "If they can access the Internet, they can get to anything," Hutchinson Police Chief Dick Heitschmidt said. "Anyone in the whole world could have access, if that's what really happened.""
I'm sure Jack Thompson will blame this on BioShock.
Why don't these stores copyright their video feed and then let loose the RIAA on the perps. That'll stop 'em!
threadeds blog
Why are the security cameras on anything other than a closed circuit? It makes no sense for their cameras to be connected to the internet.
My humor is probably your flamebait
That depends on what country the bank account is in. In some countries, bank accounts can't necessarily be tracked back to the owner, they are secured only by a really, really fscking long account number.
My blog
It's a valid question. Companies put security cameras on the internet to enable remote recording and control. It lets the central office or outsourced security firm handle all the digital video and dispatch police/fire services from a cost-efficient central location. If you owned 100 convenience stores in 10 states, where would you put the security office and how would you link them?
Rather than build a dedicated hardwired telecom network, companies are using the internet to connect everything together (security systems, financial systems, medical records, industrial control, etc.) As we can see from this example, they think they've created their own virtual network (of some degree of privacy), but in practice, the system is extremely vulnerable. I'd bet that more than a few internet-connected security cameras run with factory-default passwords.
Two wrongs don't make a right, but three lefts do.
This is called a JURY POOL TAINTING STATEMENT. It is designed to predispose those eligible for jury service in the jurisdictions involved to convict by using the element of fear and terror. Whenever a statement made by law enforcement officials about an alleged criminal act is broadcast, it should be quoted in the voir dire process to screen out the rubberstampers. These are defined as those who (are carefully instructed to) worry about wives, kids, homes, SUV's entertainment systems, 401k's vacations, etc. Since the media as an institution is presumed diligent in publishing such statements, there is a presumption of contamination on the part of the jury pool. That is why one of the boilerplate questions asked by the parties in court deals with this issue of media contaminating his/her worldview or view of the defendant.
Those who have a place in the system have no place in a jury.
Submission as evidence constitutes plaintiff and/or prosecutorial misconduct.
And easily found if you know what to look for.
In my WarDriving travels, I've come apon many SSID-hidden wireless networks around stores. Sometimes they aren't even encrypted. My recent curiosity with these nets reveals a few wifi networked cameras in some locations, and sometimes if you log into these networks, you can find a nat. From there it's simply accessing a site that gives you a IP.
But why bother when you already have access to there cameras via a unsecured access point?
Anonymous for obvious reasons.
You just slashdotted a whole lotta webcams.
Appended to the end of comments you post. 120 chars.
From the article (Piro is the manager)....
"He then demanded that one of Piros' fingers be cut off for every hour his demands were not met, and another employee got a butcher knife on his orders"
Anybody wanna take bets on who was the first person fired after this incident?
Georgia Tech, the leader in Chia(tm) technology.