Pink, Blue, and Bad Science
DocDJ writes "Ben Goldacre writes an excellent column in The Guardian called Bad Science, which regularly demonstrates how poor the mainstream media are at reporting science. He recently pointed out the flaws in the reporting of research that purported to show the evolutionary basis of 'blue for boys, pink for girls'." Another Guardian writer, Zoe Williams, has an even more acerbic take on the research.
If you mod this up, your slashdot background will turn into a beautiful sunset!
A slashbot article on misrepresentation. The ironing is delicious.
That's a study I'd like to see done.
I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
Getting up at 4:00 AM or so to watch the first shuttle launch.
Dan Rather, new at the job of anchoring liftoffs, said: (I am not making this up)
"The skies are clear this morning, so we should be seeing some spectacular entrails...."
No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
Maybe it is because pink might have a higher wavelength than blue since it is closer to red. So males can see a woman, if dressed in pink, from far away and get ready to show off or think of instant one-liners, whereas if men are dressed in blue, then women cannot see men approaching from far away and might not have their guard up on time to hear the shitty one-liner from the guy...
Well, yeah, it is due to Evolution. All the people predisposed to driving on the right are quickly removed from the gene pool.
Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
Blue! No, pink [SPROING] Aarrgghh!!
Household - with house
Me thinks you need to stop with the conspiracy theories.
You mean a liberal arts degree doesn't have anything to do with the real world?
I'm shocked... SHOCKED I say!
Well ok. Not that shocked.
[snicker]
A Human Right
Everyone knows that men prefer blue because it stands out against the red Martian landscape.
Women prefer pink because the thick Venusian atmosphere blocks the higher wavelengths of light.
Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
and when I hear the term "journalistic ethic" I cringe.
And coming from a lawyer it really drives the point home how bad journalists are.
Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
a professor i work with on autonomous modular robotics was interviewed a couple years back on the future implications of his research. generally our goals are search and rescue missions and possible space missions (reconfigurable robots are just so much more space-friendly) and the majority of our work has been towards these two milestones. the journalist, however, arrived at the interview with the fantastic vision of shrinking down these robots to nanoscale sizes and continuously (about a dozen times) asked if these robots would one day be able to enter the human body for medical purposes...
as you can imagine, my professor wasn't too amused but eventually gave in after the twelfth time being asked the question with an emphatic 'sure, why not.' and what do you know, the headline that week was something along the lines of 'Scientists creating robots to enter the human body.' we still haven't heard from any doctors yet....
I did hear a suggestion once that, here in the UK, we should begin to drive on the right to bring ourselves in line with the rest of Europe. Obviously, there is bound to be opposition to any such plan, so the suggestion was to start with heavy goods vehicles only and see how they get on. :-)
Ahh, now that's a horse of a different color!
That would be par for the course.
This being Slashdot and all.
Rampant carbon sequestration destroyed the Dinosaurs' tropical paradise. I'm here to help repair the damage.
Well said.
It's been a long time.
You guys are all doing computer science, but I was thinking math too. So, let e>0: (3-e)+(3-e)=6-2*e now take the limit as e goes to 0. Course, the right left side terms become 3, but now let's turn to the magic of floats and doubles (C++, which I'm pleased to see you guys using too. If you're a geek, you know what I mean. And since you guys replied, clearly geeks.) for(double i=1;i>0;i/=10) printf("%f\n",i); Through out the loop, i>0, yet the result is 6. (Didn't check if it compiled. hope hope) Just a thought experiment, really. I'm typing this from my parents basement. :-(