OOXML Vote and the CPI Corruption Index
Tapani Tarvainen writes "It turns out there's an interesting correlation between Transparency International's 'corruption perceptions index' and voting behavior in ISO's OOXML decision. Countries with a lower score (more corruption) on the 2006 CPI were more likely to vote in favor of OOXML, and those with a higher score were less likely. According to the analysis, 'This statistics supports with a P value of 0.07328 the hypothesis that the corrupted countries were more likely to vote for approval (one-tailed Fisher's Exact test). In other words, simplified a bit: the likelihood that there was no positive correlation between the corruption level and probability of an approval vote, that is, this is just a random effect, is about 7%.' Of course, correlation doesn't prove causality."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:FSM_Pirates.jp
I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
"OOXML Vote and the Corruption Perceptions Index Corruption Index"
OK, that's it for now - I have to run down to the ATM machine and put in my PIN number...
Of course it did! MS looked at the CPI ratings and then targeted their corruption attempts in the seemingly most suitable direction, so different ratings would have affected the outcome directly!
So, for example, OpenISO.org may publish something along the lines of:
Whereas SoiOpen.com may publish something along the lines of:
Sorted.
Indeed. How else would we be able to settle on the proper way to brew a cup of tea?