Slashdot Mirror


Mars Rovers Return to Exploration

inkslinger77 writes "The two Mars rovers that have been carefully conserving critical power supplies since June, when the summer dust-storm season began on the red planet, are now springing back to work as the storms subside. Typically, the solar panels on each rover produce about 700 watt-hours of electricity per day — enough to light a 100-watt bulb for seven hours, according to NASA. But this year's dust storms reduced that to as little as 128 watt hours per day. When daily power generation is down to less than 400 watt-hours, the rovers suspend their driving on the planet and stop using their robotic arms, cameras and other instruments. But they are back in action now!"

18 of 145 comments (clear)

  1. Batteries by Esion+Modnar · · Score: 4, Funny

    Hope they're not Li-ion.

    --

    They say the first thing to go is your penis. Well, it's either that or your brain. I forget which...
  2. I don't think you need NASA to say that by caluml · · Score: 5, Funny
    each rover produce about 700 watt-hours of electricity per day -- enough to light a 100-watt bulb for seven hours, according to NASA.

    I don't think you need NASA to say that - I think I can confirm that 700 watt-hours will power a 100-watt bulb (or device) for 7 hours. furthermore, improving on NASA, I can also say that it will power 7 100-watt bulbs for 1 hour, or 1 700-watt bulb for an hour.

    1. Re: I don't think you need NASA to say that by D4C5CE · · Score: 4, Funny

      Shush, next thing you're gonna tell journalists one doesn't even need to be a rocket scientist to figure out maths? ;-)

    2. Re:I don't think you need NASA to say that by Scutter · · Score: 4, Funny

      Sorry, but your UID has to be below 850,000 before you can create a new meme. Sorry.

      I think you meant under 20,000.

      --

      "Tell me doctor, with all of your defenses, are there any provisions for an attack by killer bees?"
    3. Re:I don't think you need NASA to say that by Ed+Avis · · Score: 4, Funny

      But on Slashdot, uids under 20000 are only for old people!

      --
      -- Ed Avis ed@membled.com
    4. Re:I don't think you need NASA to say that by empaler · · Score: 5, Funny

      But on Slashdot, uids under 20000 are only for old people! ... according to NASA.
    5. Re:I don't think you need NASA to say that by Ami+Ganguli · · Score: 4, Funny

      Don't let it get you down, young'n. ... Ami.

      --
      It is tempting, if the only tool you have is a hammer, to treat everything as if it were a nail. - Abraham Maslow
    6. Re:I don't think you need NASA to say that by Joseph+Vigneau · · Score: 4, Funny

      I have nothing witty to say here.

    7. Re:I don't think you need NASA to say that by lars · · Score: 4, Funny

      Back in *my* day you actually had to work for your +5 funny posts, not just show up with a low user ID!

  3. It runs and runs and runs... by zeromorph · · Score: 4, Informative

    It runs and runs and runs...

    The dust storm even kind of polished it.

    Go rover go!

    --
    "Hannibal's plans never work right. They just work." Amy/A-Team
    1. Re:It runs and runs and runs... by OriginalArlen · · Score: 4, Interesting
      The rovers normally do a sun stare (through thick h-a filters I believe) to measure tau, the fraction of sunlight that's making it through the atmosphere. Here's a mosaic of those sun stares from the last month or so, corrected to show the light as it would actually appear to the rover. The dramatic darkening of the sun is obvious. The feat of building rovers that not only live (at time of writing) thirteen times over their design lifetime, but survive on less than half the power that was originally expected to kill them both stone-dead, is going to be a legend in unmanned spaceflight for a long time to come... (For the last 3 years, those of us following the rovers on a daily basis believed the official line that less than 280Wh/day would mean bricked rover after a couple of days. The minimum Oppy received was 128 W/h - and (thanks partly for the nice warm summer weather) it didn't even trip the emergency heaters which come on at 39*C below. Kudos to Emily Lakdawala of the Planetary Society, who got an awesome congrats note from Jim Bell, the MER imaging lead.

      The untold story of the MER rovers is the triumphant vindication of Steve Squyres' then unprecedented decision to allow the raw imagery to be automatically thrown up on the net virtually as they came in - so that in some cases, the amateur mosaics, panoramas and other post-processed images were sometimes out before the official JPL team had even seen the raw data. Indeed someone even wrote an application specifically to pull down, process and render the raw data. (Yeah, it's GPL'd :) )

      --

      Everything I needed to know about life, I learnt from Blake's Seven
  4. Since it seems to come up every time by evanbd · · Score: 5, Informative

    The issue of whether or not to put some sort of dust-clearing device on the panels was examined critically and decided on early in this project. In short: they didn't know what dust storms would do to the panels; it turns out they tend to remove dust. Several options for dust clearing were considered -- wipers, electrostatic techniques, peel-away plastic, and probably others I've forgotten. All of them would have *probably* worked, and all of them would have taken up space and weight. Essentially it came down to choosing between dust removal and an instrument. Faced with that decision, they decided that better quality, more complete data was more interesting than having the rovers run longer.

    Of course, they got lucky, and the dust storms seem to clear dust off the panels. So there was even less need for dust-clearing than they thought there might be.

  5. mars solar time by harlemjoe · · Score: 4, Informative

    Shame on me, but this is the first time I visited the mars rover website. It struck me as slightly odd that NASA researchers call the Martian Solar Day the sol.

    Anyway, for those similarly bemused and/or further intrigued, here is the explanation of Mars Solar Time as Adopted by the Mars24 Sunclock

    --
    shooting is not too good for my enemies
  6. Re:Amazing by unfunk · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I was almost sure that at least one of them wouldn't survive the storms, but, fortunately, reality proved me wrong. Go NASA! I actually think it's kinda surreal, the way they just keep going.
    If mankind ever makes it to Mars in the flesh, I hope they bring one back and give it a medal or something.
    Maybe mount a plaque at the point where it 'died' on Mars as well.
  7. Re:Next? by paleo2002 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Are you kidding? These rovers are functioning way beyond their mission parameters. They've collected more data than anyone expected. We've gone from "What if there's water on Mars" to "How much water is there on Mars?". The rovers survived a Martian dust storm! Martian dust storms have been known to cover the entire planet.

    Let's put it this way. If your car was as well-designed and resilient as these rovers it would run on empty for 100 miles, drive up mountains, and review your tax returns.

  8. Not descriptive enough by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 4, Funny

    Why are you describing to slashdotters, 700 watt-hours will light up a 100watt bulb for 7 hours? Is it that easily imaginable? Should use very precise engineering descriptions like, four football fields long or as big as a refrigerator or something. The most descriptive way to describe 700 watt-hours would be something like the energy spent by a senator tapping the restroom stall floor with foot over his entire three term career or the energy used by a /. mod marking 8324 posts as trolls, flamebaits and underrated.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
  9. Software Never Dies by curmudgeon99 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    We as software developers here should take note of this. The code you're writing and putting into production has the potential to last for decades. For example, out of college my first programming job was for Mutual of Omaha. They had lots of code that was written in the late 1960s in Assembler or in (gag) COBOL. Well, although someone like me would have loved to have rewritten those systems, it was not happening. Then, take another point. I myself wrote a large system for them that--according to friends who are still there--and that system has not been changed much since then. So, folks, the point is this: you write a lot of applications. Some won't survive a year. Others... they may be doing their job in twenty years. Machines wear out but--properly designed and maintained--software never does. Bravo to Spirit & Opportunity and the teams that built those kickass pieces of hardware/software.

  10. Author Shill by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Looks like IDG (ComputerWorld) is really hitting Slashdot HARD, either that or they have a deal with Slashdot. Here's a partial list of the shills that regularly show up and have almost 100% article acceptance rates:

    inkslinger77

    narramissic

    jcatcw

    If it's all OK and everything with the corporate ownership of Slashdot to be played by IDG, I suppose that's their business, but one would hope that they are actually getting PAID for being part of IDG's advertising program. And of course there should be disclosure so that visitors to Slashdot realize they are reading advertisements and not an article submitted by a "real" user...

    --
    If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.