Slashdot Mirror


Storm Worm More Powerful Than Top Supercomputers

Stony Stevenson writes to mention that some security researchers are claiming that the Storm Worm has grown so massive that it could rival the world's top supercomputers in terms of raw power. "Sergeant said researchers at MessageLabs see about 2 million different computers in the botnet sending out spam on any given day, and he adds that he estimates the botnet generally is operating at about 10 percent of capacity. 'We've seen spikes where the owner is experimenting with something and those spikes are usually five to 10 times what we normally see,' he said, noting he suspects the botnet could be as large as 50 million computers. 'That means they can turn on the taps whenever they want to.'"

10 of 390 comments (clear)

  1. Massive storm worm? by EveryNickIsTaken · · Score: 5, Funny

    Where's Paul Atredies when you need him?

  2. Imagine... by nuclearpenguins · · Score: 5, Funny

    Imagine a beowulf clus.... never mind.

    --
    Anonymous Coward: "This is slashdot. Accuracy is second class citizen here, unlike King Bias."
  3. Does this work on Linux? by Erikderzweite · · Score: 5, Funny

    I was unable to find this worm in Gentoo's portage tree. When do we get our ebuilds? Yet again, it is a discrimination for all Linux people.
    I'll tell you - as long as there are no worms for GNU/Linux, we won't see the masses converting to free operation system! RMS has to write a Gworm at last! If an open-source worm beats closed and proprietary Storm Worm this will be a clear indication of superiority of FLOSS!

    1. Re:Does this work on Linux? by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 4, Funny
      Here is the Linux compatible worm for you:

      A simple email message: "This is a linux virus. It works on the honor principle. Please forward the attached bash script to everyone in your .mailrc and then execute it. Thanks."

      --
      sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
  4. Re:"Add the computers together"? by nacturation · · Score: 4, Funny

    Is there some kind of standardized performance metric for sending spam messages? Of course there is: Libraries of Congress per second.
    --
    Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
  5. Who'd have guessed that Windows can scale so well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    wow

  6. Not really like a supercomputer though by SpaFF · · Score: 4, Funny

    While it might be more powerful than machines on the TOP500 in terms of raw number-crunching ability, it lacks any sort of high-speed interconnect for message passing. The latency issue would make for poor benchmark results in most "supercomputer" type tests (Linpack, etc.)

    --
    -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- Version: 3.12 GIT d? s: a-- C++++ UL++++ P++ L+++ E- W++ N o-- K- w--- O- M+ V PS+ P
  7. Re:Storm Worm - good name for sci-fi novel by bytesex · · Score: 4, Funny

    As long as it means operating the escape key with one of Angelinas boobies, I'm all for it !

    --
    Religion is what happens when nature strikes and groupthink goes wrong.
  8. Re:Fine the technically illiterate by QMO · · Score: 5, Funny

    Folding@Home is the biggest waste of time on the Internet without exception. It's worthless.
    Not quite. Don't forget World of Warcraft.
    --
    Exam 4/C again. Maybe I'll do better this time.
  9. Re:Can somebody explain by lightversusdark · · Score: 4, Funny

    a few rouge nodes

    This would cause a bleu screen of death on said rouge nodes.
    --
    "There is nothing nice about Steve Jobs and nothing evil about Bill Gates." - Chuck Peddle