Open Letter to ISO Calls For Standardization of Process
In a recent open letter to the ISO FreeCode CEO Geir Isene calls for standardization in the processes used by the ISO to help prevent future OOXML blunders. "It seems ISO is not prepared for a politicized process where a big and influential commercial enterprise will use any means possible to push its own standard through to certification. Committees are flooded by the vendor in support of the standard. Votes are bought and results are hijacked. Several national bodies have flawed and skewed procedures open for corruption."
Maybe they should get ISO 9000 certified...
You are using English. Please learn the difference between loose and lose; they're, there, and their; your and you're.
how will they run the process for standardizing their standardization process without a standard process for processing standardization? Argh, my head....
Then we'll need an ISO standard for creating ISO standards for creating ISO standards.
Then we'll need... I don't think we'll ever catch up.
Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
"we"? What's your position in ISO?
If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
I completely agree. They should begin forming a committee, with supporting sub-committees, to discuss forming the standard for creating standards immediately.
"Organic"? Can't we just leverage our synergies instead?
Only if we think out of the box and create a new paradigm.
Are you sure you want to jump right into processing standardization with out a preliminary informal sit-down? Run a memo among your peers and see if you can leverage any useful synergies first. Then create an executive summary for review.
A goal is a dream with a deadline
I'm sure Microsoft will have ECMA recommend adoption of MSOOSI, the Microsoft Only OSI Stacking Initiative. I hear there are many new committee members and banana republics who want to add their completely unbiased vote on this completely fair and open standard.
http://www.mhall119.com
1. make a country
2. Join ISO as a coting member
3. Say you will vote No with comments
4. ???
5. profit
Copyright infringement is "piracy" in the same way DRM is "consumer rape"
metastandardisation.