2007 Hugo Award Winners Announced
jX writes "This year's Hugo Award Winners have been announced at the recently launched Hugo Award official website. Some winners that should be familiar to any well read/watched geek are Vernor Vinge for Best Novel, Doctor Who for Best Dramatic Presentation, Short Form), and last years hit movie Pan's Labyrinth for Best Dramatic Presentation, Long Form. Of course, a complete list of this year's nominees and winners is also available."
I read Vernor Vinge's Rainbows End last year, and wrote the following about it:
Ok, so I was wrong about the Nebula. Can't win them all. :)
I can also highly recommend this book to everyone here at slashdot. It's the kind of book most of us will be able to relate to. A book by a geek who understands not only technology, but also the social implications thereof.
I thought "Blink" was by far the best Dr. Who episode this season.. can't believe it wasn't listed there.
Anyways, are they really canceling this show after next season?? I do hope it continues.
There should be:
Best Video Game - Console/PC
Best Video Game - Web
Best Machina - Short
Best Machina - Long
Best Interactive - Website
Best Interactive - Microsite
Essentially there are a lot more formats available for Sci-Fi/Fantasy creative works than there used to be. Let's give those people awards for their contributions.
A fool throws a stone into a well and a thousand sages can not remove it.
Am I the only one to think that every movie that was nominated besides Pan's Labyrinth was a lot better and should've won instead?
:(
In my book, Pan's Labyrinth was a jumbled, incoherent mess of a story that ultimately went nowhere. Sorry, but WW2 war stories and that kind of fairy tale fantasy just don't mix well, and Pan's Labyrinth was hopping from being one to the other all the time and in the end fell flat on both accounts.
All the other movies at least told their story well, but when I watched Pan's Labyrinth in the cinema it was just one big "Huh?" distributed over 2 hours. Granted, it wasn't "Night Watch" *shudder* bad, but bad nonetheless...
(And scary? What the freak was scary about it?)
np: Señor Coconut Y Su Conjunto - Showroom Dummies (Cha-Cha-Cha) (El Baile Alemán)
"I'm not anti-anything, I'm anti-everything, it fits better." - Sole
British, as much as we scorn at American culture, we aren't much better. If at all.
If this were really happening, what would you think?
In my book, Pan's Labyrinth was a jumbled, incoherent mess of a story that ultimately went nowhere. Sorry, but WW2 war stories and that kind of fairy tale fantasy just don't mix well, and Pan's Labyrinth was hopping from being one to the other all the time and in the end fell flat on both accounts.
You're not thinking at all, it was about the Spanish civil war, not WW2. So I would assert that the film was intellectually above you. I am not going to explain why the two stories make sense together because that would spoil the film for those who are just reading this thread. But I suggest you read the imdb.com summaries.
If this were really happening, what would you think?
> Spanish is my native language, maybe that's why I was able to follow the movie from beginning to end, it was like poetry.
I don't speak Spanish and my only other Spanish-language film has been Y Tu Mama Tambien, but I can tell you that you didn't need to understand Spanish to get the poetry of Pan's Labyrinth.
For the first ten minutes I thought it was going to be a Narnia-wannabe, and then I realized that this fairy-tale was fucked up, and I saw what the director was doing counterposing the equally fucked up real world against the fairy tale (note: this film doesn't do PG-13 action scenes. You *will* feel disturbed watching some of the real world action unless you are borderline psycho.) Still, it was a fairy tale, I reasoned, and happily waited for the happy ending. It never came. Or did it? The fairy tale did end happily after all -- the princess went back to her father and lived happily ever after. How the viewer chooses to understand this is his own business, but the cognitive dissonance created in this film is par excellence.
And oh -- the sparingly used monsters in this film are *way* more intense than the relatively bland CGI creatures being turned out by Hollywood (see for example Narnia and now The Golden Compass).
And this doesn't even begin to cover the talented actors, especially Ivana Baquero, and the excellent music.
I do realize this film isn't for everyone -- it requires the viewer to connect emotionally with the characters on-screen. But the director makes it really, really easy to do this given the quality of the work.